From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 477D9256C6C; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 10:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759315817; cv=none; b=eaeEUNATZhhgGQSscVOMxNfDJSVMew0kIj8Zggy2x+QnNMC17lyfJSalh7W3E+wzFQEiTXZEkhXVOsLyzLuJqPsdp+Fv4fueVh6FoTOkrEEHsx7y4hK4RFIkw/u/bWzaVF1JkJrr+GgG8CqDtOM1s9K3YVqT9jg1/RJah4bL1s4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759315817; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hhvNi4BXC/oxjZ8wjfR0Blg8dvrF7jVgQ/eOAP7QG7M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kZmeiOv8Xt9gGDcq3Q5IswJmdt1xEAIba/EmD+wn2XKvwlCNah5TKwsglTO8BNI7TqTGiJ73dGo+SzN2gPgnm1XXdhUfwRteo+ZOj5CBivBg7GdkN3Ns29Ecjn2xvB5JxKiofHKJ1IX/YmU+eHWlWdEWX2PwcV/po/9+vluufPE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=y7byy0Ki; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="y7byy0Ki" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42568C4CEF4; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 10:50:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1759315816; bh=hhvNi4BXC/oxjZ8wjfR0Blg8dvrF7jVgQ/eOAP7QG7M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=y7byy0KiICFZvNXvebaDQaziQSJyHfBz2cSXui2H9SfN/RMOHb6jawoqmbmlZ8dMw Xg6iLhKalepk7RnqKQSdEzAY6hb4h5eU7yQrpYpn+5ovyWukumSH583MqIaTsXoAcp 5gOTHzepVRolMSXymvlLTqasRtb4pvPcW5XKi3SY= Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 12:50:13 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, Dan Carpenter , Arnd Bergmann , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block , Anders Roxell , Ben Copeland Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025100105-strewn-waving-35de@gregkh> References: <20250930143822.939301999@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:57:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release. > > There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10. > Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1 > > First seen on 5.10.243-rc1. > > ltp-syscalls > - fanotify13 > - fanotify14 > - fanotify15 > - fanotify16 > - fanotify21 > - landlock04 > - ioctl_ficlone02 > > Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat > failed with exit code 1 > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > We are investigating and running bisections. > > ### Test log > tst_test.c:1888: TINFO: === Testing on vfat === > tst_test.c:1217: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts='' > mkfs.vfat: Partitions or virtual mappings on device '/dev/loop0', not > making filesystem (use -I to override) > tst_test.c:1217: TBROK: mkfs.vfat failed with exit code 1 > HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c285a2f01d69 You are not missing this "fix". > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bc2473c90fca You are missing that one, but why is a overlayfs commit being cared about for vfat? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c45beebfde34a Another overlayfs patch that is not backported that far. Again, why is this a hint for vfat? thanks, greg k-h