From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA8CB46B5; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 07:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759389347; cv=none; b=g4uWRBVvqX46LL1u8ZLbafBIKKMgIkj2t0GfIMmEg5R3JGEvnojHxcJ0wEmO1EhWzln8DIJARRLckX/Ktlh2h+QxtTyubgxUdYqe4d53/z69vxj+8AZIyjG0Tl7gvtIBuUlSNSIQjbUzJTJx/oOxeTUf9ZtNcnvI1SBvOoXNwuE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759389347; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yHg9LnQA/vyN93mYt9CFZyRHYlp6lnwRryQNbGhWdLg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=K4zQKJYNGi8Jef2ucrVk/62FnaXwzkqeeKjS4ie8LhOi9Nh86ohwwx0PlqvOq5UiGBK4kXfzcbOpUrt2a//EuevjE2VIRfIqL0QUNPnFvBMWv7dNMavj3Vxzy4LkLAX+bYZcYa/i2+2hfRrNlNYaXtay4fTmWX573r/U+E6TTkE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=VCTlrWqE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="VCTlrWqE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0C65C4CEF4; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 07:15:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1759389347; bh=yHg9LnQA/vyN93mYt9CFZyRHYlp6lnwRryQNbGhWdLg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VCTlrWqENwQQcmcyIqotd0Mf2ClAxV05hUsGaTOmFpkoVFoWuV5BRHaJGTjy68hGB sViisERTFATT3dQrDO72zzxjQ8Z6syMpPBhQTj06CQnPyae6dmqOuBU6B9gP5mIvJO mCqUnMkEip+hY5cHEP/xdxtYiROk/HwrJ8XeI/Yg= Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 09:15:43 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/89] 6.12.50-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025100225-clumsily-energy-68a9@gregkh> References: <20250930143821.852512002@linuxfoundation.org> <7c481b23-d623-4fc8-9b31-78db6d1f7245@roeck-us.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7c481b23-d623-4fc8-9b31-78db6d1f7245@roeck-us.net> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 12:18:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 9/30/25 07:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.50 release. > > There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > s390:allmodconfig: > parisc:allmodconfig: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c: In function 'scale': > ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:536:45: error: > call to '__compiletime_assert_666' declared with attribute error: clamp() low limit source_min greater than high limit source_max > include/linux/compiler_types.h:517:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert' > 517 | prefix ## suffix(); \ > | ^~~~~~ > include/linux/compiler_types.h:536:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert' > 536 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert' > 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/minmax.h:188:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' > 188 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(statically_true(ulo > uhi), \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/minmax.h:195:9: note: in expansion of macro '__clamp_once' > 195 | __clamp_once(type, val, lo, hi, __UNIQUE_ID(v_), __UNIQUE_ID(l_), __UNIQUE_ID(h_)) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/minmax.h:206:28: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_clamp' > 206 | #define clamp(val, lo, hi) __careful_clamp(__auto_type, val, lo, hi) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c:47:22: note: in expansion of macro 'clamp' > 47 | source_val = clamp(source_val, source_min, source_max); > > This is exposed by the minmax patch series, as with 6.12.49. > > Fixed upstream with commit 6f7150741584 ("drm/i915/backlight: Return immediately > when scale() finds invalid parameters"). This patch also includes an explanation > of what exactly happens (and thanks again to Linus for the analysis). Sorry about that, I missed this when you previously reported, my fault. I'll go queue this up everywhere now. thanks, greg k-h