From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f46.google.com (mail-ej1-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA06309DD2 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 08:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761121578; cv=none; b=Cv0AxG+rj93gQQAEKTqZoBNRz04iCp/ZXmlkvMNijbDcHb581TxRB70iWlEryLIQIR/uSyGNUWkodcVUy3dycS6Bqrp3iGlcR90oV4zokzAeAyLlk4i2L0hz7U2DGMWr/Ij37eZ45XI6wvvqz2/DYw8NzGyilejqV0P3b3AJFs4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761121578; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q6H986X15qYys1qfZkB9W2dW8AtLZxTL9G3Hoa0FETk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=nVutKIZnzhOM7p04F2rYXfy9tmwRWKRmPN409nQtzuy1ZYS1R9mSh4zSWx9wy8VfwVyo8l/ALcUhb7yU2W+tMMC4bJilfBrOzflMSlaKlmEY5nKdEQ3MNQ/jC+iJfv64uGStFwBHgsG+rb63zbPecBScSeGWXTyTXpDUV/xUIVY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=OCZsTbOP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="OCZsTbOP" Received: by mail-ej1-f46.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b50645ecfbbso1288724566b.1 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 01:26:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1761121574; x=1761726374; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NDyEa99uEXhpux+y1jdsG/DCyMfzL2pd992wei+/e1g=; b=OCZsTbOPoFWQmWwARrNlsmu7BLUh5tiKKz3qPg2H+xgP+0JdKxDIGtwDED+5ouZGFJ YVSXFKYd/Uk48GEsg1fcMtYJVfSP8Bp6qMKa4YfGEwEOs4vwGWbUtHCO21Snz9ZFYjG6 W+/BUI8iaZQU51hVCfENHwxRO6f7QcIF3fRNmhhAs1aYyjVlamjjsKqiVGhsKla7S2WX EbKql6URth4EuyAcZeGEQSE6DBmAUg1dfXnxc3UHl0PMaRlnbOy+Bd0IWU2GiVqgKbAL Esc3qobZx2HkITWVyI7irCF5A2+6XQh/I8GSpd/1ePtbFm0poHFnocWcw4OK4P9i2stD j/XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761121574; x=1761726374; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NDyEa99uEXhpux+y1jdsG/DCyMfzL2pd992wei+/e1g=; b=loD6cm3qV2FoDLZwsXsfxBHcF8vKNd3arMrQil3ky3Yd6DrWou9BtKROgNlNi7MZ9k b7XLLLc/e+tQ8llhZU/ULg03fh/6VTtrsBCJCM5PutUglYDZSIDxN+/QrEQRKDF1gSKi Eyi03TjMGXdOWD7qG2dD1a/yzvCHXyFwGZNaJ8yRDJGmOR5SoEBNAcrxK1agsl0rAdnr QYplsDOOSXZ8PGgGoXpkbJLFzD+FcIfmTBje1fFPqfxu9aZS6YfrXYyc+8hdK2awDR4u gqz1kRvNMI0OHiZi8m8okE+/l/q6yHz6nicCZX5yxj0Rda2N3wXDBcb7Qrfa5SvHGw5X A/kQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXn+tx4F9CKiGd0KpghkUBaPf3tBXkAWeOAzAHEC99DzipHPFM3HZsFt1xgmm5pQgSLDtJOrIDa@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyOB9AY4G9oUCzlSnRJEKlNE1jmXNm2m0toqGRuCUoLayXqTRmN UGa6ElLhMldaddJcEodcuUkF0cppFFdyWvExLxQRwWA42aJrHn1Ph8KG X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuNiNTWLm/NQS6c53j6jUZUO3LDvWVrtkJI9xcqcuBtwj/ar7zR/kvXCVDDws/ 2NVvWPMowrrWH6hrrVbbbvrbPOlSRehs+iio7bYi/4mwj6sBHAGIOhCX9bQ8FC62EK7FZNJklsx tRhgug43/96u7HVkrUvlLpQSJ15omr3dGY57gKBQW4S33eLlbrYJ/Y+IC9gF/qllpvzpCOhld5k Bb/SxBzJr/N3Jio/j7UzK86UYHVoAYrhKB9ydzqyRw37Des/sp9ZtRXJV0h6H0gk2ObCQ5HvmXT WyLARSv3qjAOD6oLVnZT8HR7KKbwTfj3fTp4LzTCwQvtZG14FWD5YiUcO8U7YHUUOsSh+9mpey8 8fZIKfUivlY4LREmBYzOSoSSAN6JTFoG7PSPbn4qy95VZnleVMP4WXqHv16J8r9H0KYwIr4wIfk 6I X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFMC1ZTRJ80d2+tQCzLJZEUcRjgNolpnafRAvb1tXsgv9lX8RVp0jdHUx6GvU3poKNRSafE7g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7ea6:b0:b3e:3c1c:d2f2 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b6474940fc1mr2581204566b.36.1761121573582; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 01:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([212.73.77.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-b6cfa6cb6e6sm365510866b.49.2025.10.22.01.26.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Oct 2025 01:26:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Askar Safin To: hch@infradead.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de, axboe@kernel.dk, bp@alien8.de, brauner@kernel.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, cyphar@cyphar.com, ddiss@suse.de, dyoung@redhat.com, email2tema@gmail.com, graf@amazon.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, initramfs@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, jrtc27@jrtc27.com, julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de, kees@kernel.org, krzk@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, mzxreary@0pointer.de, nschichan@freebox.fr, patches@lists.linux.dev, rob@landley.net, safinaskar@gmail.com, thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de, thorsten.blum@linux.dev, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] initrd: remove half of classic initrd support Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:26:04 +0300 Message-ID: <20251022082604.25437-1-safinaskar@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Christoph Hellwig : > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 03:05:35PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > Without Acks or buy-in from other maintainers this is not a change we > > can just do given that a few people already piped up and expressed > > reservations that this would be doable for them. > > > > @Christoph, you marked this as deprecated years ago. > > What's your take on this? > > I'd love to see it go obviously. But IIRC we had various users show > up, which speaks against removing it. Maybe the first step would be > a separate config option just for block-based initrd? So far in recent months 3 people spoke against initrd removal. All they are in Cc. They are: - Julian Stecklina. He planned to use initrd with erofs, which is currently not supported anyway. Also, he replied to v1: "You have all my support for nuking so much legacy code!" "Acked-by: Julian Stecklina " ( https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1f9aee6090716db537e9911685904786b030111f.camel@cyberus-technology.de/ ) - Gao Xiang, maintainer of erofs. He also planned to use initrd with erofs, which is currently not supported anyway. Also, he said to me: > Again, I don't have any strong opinion to kill initrd entirely because > I think initdax may be more efficient and I don't have any time to work > on this part -- it's unrelated to my job. ( https://lore.kernel.org/all/79315382-5ba8-42c1-ad03-5cb448b23b72@linux.alibaba.com/ ) - Nicolas Schichan. He has million devices, which use initrd. But they use root=/dev/ram code path, not linuxrc code path, which I'm removing. He explained this here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250918152830.438554-1-nschichan@freebox.fr/ So, this patchset will not impact these people. So, I think it is okay to remove linuxrc now. We can revert this patchset if needed. -- Askar Safin