From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E521929BDB4; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 19:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762457540; cv=none; b=VnSxEprS4FA4AtTjCMRhoqSe2zNs7N5LRY1DId6iT8Vf0HJFfp+wExyD3iYZm7m/DbVePM55TXEw53fC6wN5WwsmX+Lt6MCiNrN1g4oPzQNqc3hQf+kisJoTw5+jNySzOTsDgwcwz2z/oiF6b+ch9tAfDw1wx/mCM155CAM8XZY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762457540; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ni+Z5fTEF+YJcvFBiJo8VsFjNREBSsxC1Q0KaC1UIhc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=vB+X6trhKaGvS5Ykt9tqO6RVKDM0Zg3nYK97sVlFBlmwONeyWAQNTeD4iwiI0KNfgQ5JRIuDV6aTtN+napy1rhgempVmd87h1RenvtiERCLYEtxnTjOQN/uK58GJ+EL9nxaN1UTKMBNKfL6Hr40tYkkXbMdF5BsnVP2mVNQDzG4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=uhdO2rCK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="uhdO2rCK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E8D4C4CEF7; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 19:32:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762457539; bh=Ni+Z5fTEF+YJcvFBiJo8VsFjNREBSsxC1Q0KaC1UIhc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uhdO2rCKwc+m0T3GRreLTpCoc5sP9T/rvc7JdYXyMVyq9t2UIeMfwKwuGrCedb4mB IulL3ag5sFDPptex2EzW0EpD0C0vaHM4pFM9NJqPBFNscAzd1ENQpBWjb5Rtvk/aN5 oXL/G0M/75n99PNK2nMXN/TnxshE1hxmrxDGghvhJt7jFBkXcdeSRoE/3mnmMfgcyi Wpmlp58KBHu2T1JC4KaisdmcrtrUpEFDYF0E1+w7LhE65Yr6GA4/4z+dwatO7Befqr u3ljs477WayN0WliI2TP/lfQ1Po/+bUuYbJTv8CgKgBAC9e+Cm3pSzB+ULcD2lDAG9 EIXUKO2Dz1ljg== Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 11:32:18 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Naresh Kamboju , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/411] 5.15.186-rc1 review Message-ID: <202511061127.52ECA4AB40@keescook> References: <20250623130632.993849527@linuxfoundation.org> <2025062439-tamer-diner-68e9@gregkh> <2025062517-lucrative-justness-83fe@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2025062517-lucrative-justness-83fe@gregkh> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 09:39:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 07:15:24AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 15:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:12:05AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 18:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.186 release. > > > > > There are 411 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:05:51 +0000. > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.186-rc1.gz > > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > Regressions on arm64 allyesconfig builds with gcc-12 and clang failed on > > > > the Linux stable-rc 5.15.186-rc1. > > > > > > > > Regressions found on arm64 > > > > * arm64, build > > > > - gcc-12-allyesconfig > > > > > > > > Regression Analysis: > > > > - New regression? Yes > > > > - Reproducibility? Yes > > > > > > > > Build regression: stable-rc 5.15.186-rc1 arm64 > > > > drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:702:9: error: positional initialization > > > > of field in 'struct' declared with 'designated_init' attribute > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > > > > > > > ## Build errors > > > > drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:702:9: error: positional initialization > > > > of field in 'struct' declared with 'designated_init' attribute > > > > [-Werror=designated-init] > > > > 702 | { > > > > | ^ > > > > drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:702:9: note: (near initialization for > > > > 'qedf_cb_ops') > > > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > > > > > I saw this locally, at times, it's random, not always showing up. Turn > > > off the gcc randconfig build option and it goes away, which explains the > > > randomness I guess. > > > > > > If you can bisect this to a real change that causes it, please let me > > > know, I couldn't figure it out and so just gave up as I doubt anyone is > > > really using that gcc plugin for that kernel version. > > > > You are right ! > > The reported arm64 allyesconfig build failures are due to, > > > > randstruct: gcc-plugin: Remove bogus void member > > [ Upstream commit e136a4062174a9a8d1c1447ca040ea81accfa6a8 ] > > Thanks for the bisection, for some reason that wasn't working for me. > I've dropped this, and the other randstruct change from 5.15.y and older > kernels now. This thread got pointed out to me. You can put this back in if you want; you just need the other associated fix (which had a bit of an obscure Fixes tag): d8720235d5b5 ("scsi: qedf: Use designated initializer for struct qed_fcoe_cb_ops") -Kees -- Kees Cook