From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9045D3A2AEA for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 18:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772302670; cv=none; b=p3mMZuKWU6g6mRZj8BkFXflDGk6BnjCYr2v7hkBu9zBidTziWgBb0wr2TNTdTEEL3/KsZh0eiL+L7oTzFZG7DqZHgc24eCdqX+m4uxnfBbIV03xw/MetkZrj6JGCDS0qOSU/HjRWUwtcZ4PO3C1UfohaKHT+QIeibXCcc09Ect0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772302670; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eJqEAgwneIClnQzo40eg2bbC5uuZFPdRojSvCY70EFc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=vD8C4PLGdoQGPEYttvJ/mu616zzqEggb1UmDBplz9UIBblboKWOsyr5xKiwj12dofhSI2Q7OSyXwIDk1MsUhTHJ7qbQiRZdqlrKGYYbc4J/0Ju4Bq7lffClbRPiO3xV/9UKDp5ez66zh7R4ZuNlsBp2uyA8iab6gpvQQEVhSdWU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=T2QJWPkX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="T2QJWPkX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA48AC19423; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 18:17:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772302670; bh=eJqEAgwneIClnQzo40eg2bbC5uuZFPdRojSvCY70EFc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=T2QJWPkXtBsaFDInT9cTP8ZPj47Z0wmV10qP4Ikvi2ChaKuNAFKi0OA+DnHeIje1t SKx7YM+M6mWzcsQ+gEV10j07I4lnB45TgGQOFo143PTHbRtcQYCkl23ABF+hbs6d5B vx9WU+XEmwfdw/jvpNRGvjFUMIyqmtbH5W/MdMXljoBzACCcOHxiCdBRoLk3yg+LeI mTb6IB1Iur3J9fJrQ4pA96ofYYIUUtk2Quwz+RLqffw+JDt/AFkZSFTfDN+6BJ+XMT 7W98Hyw1t115B4c4u31AqXf6hrat4lcDpAC7Ka2+9jHrubHt0OjkD4ujCDItZqGaxE pKxKxk5nTct9g== From: Sasha Levin To: patches@lists.linux.dev Cc: Li Nan , Yu Kuai , Yu Kuai , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 018/147] md/raid10: fix any_working flag handling in raid10_sync_request Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 13:15:26 -0500 Message-ID: <20260228181736.1605592-18-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.0 In-Reply-To: <20260228181736.1605592-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20260228181736.1605592-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Li Nan [ Upstream commit 99582edb3f62e8ee6c34512021368f53f9b091f2 ] In raid10_sync_request(), 'any_working' indicates if any IO will be submitted. When there's only one In_sync disk with badblocks, 'any_working' might be set to 1 but no IO is submitted. Fix it by setting 'any_working' after badblock checks. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20260105110300.1442509-11-linan666@huaweicloud.com Fixes: e875ecea266a ("md/raid10 record bad blocks as needed during recovery.") Signed-off-by: Li Nan Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c index 177cfc9f45d0c..94d3e7b27d6bf 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -3148,7 +3148,6 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)) continue; /* This is where we read from */ - any_working = 1; sector = r10_bio->devs[j].addr; if (is_badblock(rdev, sector, max_sync, @@ -3163,6 +3162,7 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, continue; } } + any_working = 1; bio = r10_bio->devs[0].bio; bio->bi_next = biolist; biolist = bio; -- 2.51.0