From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: 1468888505@139.com,davem@davemloft.net,dsahern@kernel.org,edumazet@google.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,kuba@kernel.org,nbd@nbd.name,pabeni@redhat.com,patches@lists.linux.dev,willemb@google.com,yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "net: add support for segmenting TCP fraglist GSO packets" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:37:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026031912-bonded-disk-eac1@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260302065513.2695586-1-1468888505@139.com>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
net: add support for segmenting TCP fraglist GSO packets
to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
net-add-support-for-segmenting-tcp-fraglist-gso-packets.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From stable+bounces-222523-greg=kroah.com@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 2 07:55:21 2026
From: Li hongliang <1468888505@139.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 14:55:13 +0800
Subject: net: add support for segmenting TCP fraglist GSO packets
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, nbd@nbd.name
Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, willemb@google.com
Message-ID: <20260302065513.2695586-1-1468888505@139.com>
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
[ Upstream commit bee88cd5bd83d40b8aec4d6cb729378f707f6197 ]
Preparation for adding TCP fraglist GRO support. It expects packets to be
combined in a similar way as UDP fraglist GSO packets.
For IPv4 packets, NAT is handled in the same way as UDP fraglist GSO.
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Li hongliang <1468888505@139.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
@@ -31,6 +31,70 @@ static void tcp_gso_tstamp(struct sk_buf
}
}
+static void __tcpv4_gso_segment_csum(struct sk_buff *seg,
+ __be32 *oldip, __be32 newip,
+ __be16 *oldport, __be16 newport)
+{
+ struct tcphdr *th;
+ struct iphdr *iph;
+
+ if (*oldip == newip && *oldport == newport)
+ return;
+
+ th = tcp_hdr(seg);
+ iph = ip_hdr(seg);
+
+ inet_proto_csum_replace4(&th->check, seg, *oldip, newip, true);
+ inet_proto_csum_replace2(&th->check, seg, *oldport, newport, false);
+ *oldport = newport;
+
+ csum_replace4(&iph->check, *oldip, newip);
+ *oldip = newip;
+}
+
+static struct sk_buff *__tcpv4_gso_segment_list_csum(struct sk_buff *segs)
+{
+ const struct tcphdr *th;
+ const struct iphdr *iph;
+ struct sk_buff *seg;
+ struct tcphdr *th2;
+ struct iphdr *iph2;
+
+ seg = segs;
+ th = tcp_hdr(seg);
+ iph = ip_hdr(seg);
+ th2 = tcp_hdr(seg->next);
+ iph2 = ip_hdr(seg->next);
+
+ if (!(*(const u32 *)&th->source ^ *(const u32 *)&th2->source) &&
+ iph->daddr == iph2->daddr && iph->saddr == iph2->saddr)
+ return segs;
+
+ while ((seg = seg->next)) {
+ th2 = tcp_hdr(seg);
+ iph2 = ip_hdr(seg);
+
+ __tcpv4_gso_segment_csum(seg,
+ &iph2->saddr, iph->saddr,
+ &th2->source, th->source);
+ __tcpv4_gso_segment_csum(seg,
+ &iph2->daddr, iph->daddr,
+ &th2->dest, th->dest);
+ }
+
+ return segs;
+}
+
+static struct sk_buff *__tcp4_gso_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ netdev_features_t features)
+{
+ skb = skb_segment_list(skb, features, skb_mac_header_len(skb));
+ if (IS_ERR(skb))
+ return skb;
+
+ return __tcpv4_gso_segment_list_csum(skb);
+}
+
static struct sk_buff *tcp4_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
netdev_features_t features)
{
@@ -40,6 +104,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *tcp4_gso_segment(
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct tcphdr)))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST)
+ return __tcp4_gso_segment_list(skb, features);
+
if (unlikely(skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)) {
const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
--- a/net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c
@@ -40,6 +40,61 @@ INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int tcp6_gro_com
return 0;
}
+static void __tcpv6_gso_segment_csum(struct sk_buff *seg,
+ __be16 *oldport, __be16 newport)
+{
+ struct tcphdr *th;
+
+ if (*oldport == newport)
+ return;
+
+ th = tcp_hdr(seg);
+ inet_proto_csum_replace2(&th->check, seg, *oldport, newport, false);
+ *oldport = newport;
+}
+
+static struct sk_buff *__tcpv6_gso_segment_list_csum(struct sk_buff *segs)
+{
+ const struct tcphdr *th;
+ const struct ipv6hdr *iph;
+ struct sk_buff *seg;
+ struct tcphdr *th2;
+ struct ipv6hdr *iph2;
+
+ seg = segs;
+ th = tcp_hdr(seg);
+ iph = ipv6_hdr(seg);
+ th2 = tcp_hdr(seg->next);
+ iph2 = ipv6_hdr(seg->next);
+
+ if (!(*(const u32 *)&th->source ^ *(const u32 *)&th2->source) &&
+ ipv6_addr_equal(&iph->saddr, &iph2->saddr) &&
+ ipv6_addr_equal(&iph->daddr, &iph2->daddr))
+ return segs;
+
+ while ((seg = seg->next)) {
+ th2 = tcp_hdr(seg);
+ iph2 = ipv6_hdr(seg);
+
+ iph2->saddr = iph->saddr;
+ iph2->daddr = iph->daddr;
+ __tcpv6_gso_segment_csum(seg, &th2->source, th->source);
+ __tcpv6_gso_segment_csum(seg, &th2->dest, th->dest);
+ }
+
+ return segs;
+}
+
+static struct sk_buff *__tcp6_gso_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ netdev_features_t features)
+{
+ skb = skb_segment_list(skb, features, skb_mac_header_len(skb));
+ if (IS_ERR(skb))
+ return skb;
+
+ return __tcpv6_gso_segment_list_csum(skb);
+}
+
static struct sk_buff *tcp6_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
netdev_features_t features)
{
@@ -51,6 +106,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *tcp6_gso_segment(
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(*th)))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST)
+ return __tcp6_gso_segment_list(skb, features);
+
if (unlikely(skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)) {
const struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from 1468888505@139.com are
queue-6.6/pnfs-fix-a-deadlock-when-returning-a-delegation-during-open.patch
queue-6.6/net-add-support-for-segmenting-tcp-fraglist-gso-packets.patch
queue-6.6/net-fix-segmentation-of-forwarding-fraglist-gro.patch
queue-6.6/nfs-pass-explicit-offset-count-to-trace-events.patch
queue-6.6/net-gso-fix-tcp-fraglist-segmentation-after-pull-from-frag_list.patch
queue-6.6/nfs-fix-a-deadlock-involving-nfs_release_folio.patch
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 6:55 [PATCH 6.6.y 1/3] net: add support for segmenting TCP fraglist GSO packets Li hongliang
2026-03-19 11:37 ` gregkh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026031912-bonded-disk-eac1@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=1468888505@139.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox