From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: 1468888505@139.com,anna@kernel.org,bcodding@hammerspace.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,patches@lists.linux.dev,trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com,wangzhaolong@huaweicloud.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "pNFS: Fix a deadlock when returning a delegation during open()" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:12:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026031952-reward-raft-9f4a@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260224072202.2940831-1-1468888505@139.com>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
pNFS: Fix a deadlock when returning a delegation during open()
to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
pnfs-fix-a-deadlock-when-returning-a-delegation-during-open.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From stable+bounces-217868-greg=kroah.com@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 24 08:22:45 2026
From: Li hongliang <1468888505@139.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:22:02 +0800
Subject: pNFS: Fix a deadlock when returning a delegation during open()
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcodding@hammerspace.com, anna@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, wangzhaolong@huaweicloud.com
Message-ID: <20260224072202.2940831-1-1468888505@139.com>
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
[ Upstream commit 857bf9056291a16785ae3be1d291026b2437fc48 ]
Ben Coddington reports seeing a hang in the following stack trace:
0 [ffffd0b50e1774e0] __schedule at ffffffff9ca05415
1 [ffffd0b50e177548] schedule at ffffffff9ca05717
2 [ffffd0b50e177558] bit_wait at ffffffff9ca061e1
3 [ffffd0b50e177568] __wait_on_bit at ffffffff9ca05cfb
4 [ffffd0b50e1775c8] out_of_line_wait_on_bit at ffffffff9ca05ea5
5 [ffffd0b50e177618] pnfs_roc at ffffffffc154207b [nfsv4]
6 [ffffd0b50e1776b8] _nfs4_proc_delegreturn at ffffffffc1506586 [nfsv4]
7 [ffffd0b50e177788] nfs4_proc_delegreturn at ffffffffc1507480 [nfsv4]
8 [ffffd0b50e1777f8] nfs_do_return_delegation at ffffffffc1523e41 [nfsv4]
9 [ffffd0b50e177838] nfs_inode_set_delegation at ffffffffc1524a75 [nfsv4]
10 [ffffd0b50e177888] nfs4_process_delegation at ffffffffc14f41dd [nfsv4]
11 [ffffd0b50e1778a0] _nfs4_opendata_to_nfs4_state at ffffffffc1503edf [nfsv4]
12 [ffffd0b50e1778c0] _nfs4_open_and_get_state at ffffffffc1504e56 [nfsv4]
13 [ffffd0b50e177978] _nfs4_do_open at ffffffffc15051b8 [nfsv4]
14 [ffffd0b50e1779f8] nfs4_do_open at ffffffffc150559c [nfsv4]
15 [ffffd0b50e177a80] nfs4_atomic_open at ffffffffc15057fb [nfsv4]
16 [ffffd0b50e177ad0] nfs4_file_open at ffffffffc15219be [nfsv4]
17 [ffffd0b50e177b78] do_dentry_open at ffffffff9c09e6ea
18 [ffffd0b50e177ba8] vfs_open at ffffffff9c0a082e
19 [ffffd0b50e177bd0] dentry_open at ffffffff9c0a0935
The issue is that the delegreturn is being asked to wait for a layout
return that cannot complete because a state recovery was initiated. The
state recovery cannot complete until the open() finishes processing the
delegations it was given.
The solution is to propagate the existing flags that indicate a
non-blocking call to the function pnfs_roc(), so that it knows not to
wait in this situation.
Reported-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@hammerspace.com>
Fixes: 29ade5db1293 ("pNFS: Wait on outstanding layoutreturns to complete in pnfs_roc()")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
[ Minor conflict resolved. ]
Signed-off-by: Li hongliang <1468888505@139.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 6 ++---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 17 ++++++---------
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -3792,8 +3792,8 @@ int nfs4_do_close(struct nfs4_state *sta
calldata->res.seqid = calldata->arg.seqid;
calldata->res.server = server;
calldata->res.lr_ret = -NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT;
- calldata->lr.roc = pnfs_roc(state->inode,
- &calldata->lr.arg, &calldata->lr.res, msg.rpc_cred);
+ calldata->lr.roc = pnfs_roc(state->inode, &calldata->lr.arg,
+ &calldata->lr.res, msg.rpc_cred, wait);
if (calldata->lr.roc) {
calldata->arg.lr_args = &calldata->lr.arg;
calldata->res.lr_res = &calldata->lr.res;
@@ -6742,7 +6742,7 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_delegreturn(struct
data->inode = nfs_igrab_and_active(inode);
if (data->inode || issync) {
data->lr.roc = pnfs_roc(inode, &data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res,
- cred);
+ cred, issync);
if (data->lr.roc) {
data->args.lr_args = &data->lr.arg;
data->res.lr_res = &data->lr.res;
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -1427,10 +1427,9 @@ pnfs_commit_and_return_layout(struct ino
return ret;
}
-bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res *res,
- const struct cred *cred)
+bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino, struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
+ struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res *res, const struct cred *cred,
+ bool sync)
{
struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(ino);
struct nfs_open_context *ctx;
@@ -1441,7 +1440,7 @@ bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino,
nfs4_stateid stateid;
enum pnfs_iomode iomode = 0;
bool layoutreturn = false, roc = false;
- bool skip_read = false;
+ bool skip_read;
if (!nfs_have_layout(ino))
return false;
@@ -1454,20 +1453,14 @@ retry:
lo = NULL;
goto out_noroc;
}
- pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
- if (test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_LOCK, &lo->plh_flags)) {
- spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
- wait_on_bit(&lo->plh_flags, NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN,
- TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
- goto retry;
- }
/* no roc if we hold a delegation */
+ skip_read = false;
if (nfs4_check_delegation(ino, FMODE_READ)) {
- if (nfs4_check_delegation(ino, FMODE_WRITE))
+ if (nfs4_check_delegation(ino, FMODE_WRITE)) {
+ lo = NULL;
goto out_noroc;
+ }
skip_read = true;
}
@@ -1476,12 +1469,43 @@ retry:
if (state == NULL)
continue;
/* Don't return layout if there is open file state */
- if (state->state & FMODE_WRITE)
+ if (state->state & FMODE_WRITE) {
+ lo = NULL;
goto out_noroc;
+ }
if (state->state & FMODE_READ)
skip_read = true;
}
+ if (skip_read) {
+ bool writes = false;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(lseg, &lo->plh_segs, pls_list) {
+ if (lseg->pls_range.iomode != IOMODE_READ) {
+ writes = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!writes) {
+ lo = NULL;
+ goto out_noroc;
+ }
+ }
+
+ pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
+ if (test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_LOCK, &lo->plh_flags)) {
+ if (!sync) {
+ pnfs_set_plh_return_info(
+ lo, skip_read ? IOMODE_RW : IOMODE_ANY, 0);
+ goto out_noroc;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ wait_on_bit(&lo->plh_flags, NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
+ goto retry;
+ }
list_for_each_entry_safe(lseg, next, &lo->plh_segs, pls_list) {
if (skip_read && lseg->pls_range.iomode == IOMODE_READ)
@@ -1521,7 +1545,7 @@ retry:
out_noroc:
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
- pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(ino, true);
+ pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(ino, sync);
if (roc) {
struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *ld = NFS_SERVER(ino)->pnfs_curr_ld;
if (ld->prepare_layoutreturn)
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
@@ -295,10 +295,9 @@ int pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return(stru
u32 seq);
int pnfs_mark_layout_stateid_invalid(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
struct list_head *lseg_list);
-bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res *res,
- const struct cred *cred);
+bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino, struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
+ struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res *res, const struct cred *cred,
+ bool sync);
int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args **argpp,
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res **respp, int *ret);
void pnfs_roc_release(struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
@@ -769,12 +768,10 @@ pnfs_layoutcommit_outstanding(struct ino
return false;
}
-
-static inline bool
-pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res *res,
- const struct cred *cred)
+static inline bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino,
+ struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
+ struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res *res,
+ const struct cred *cred, bool sync)
{
return false;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from 1468888505@139.com are
queue-6.6/pnfs-fix-a-deadlock-when-returning-a-delegation-during-open.patch
queue-6.6/nfs-pass-explicit-offset-count-to-trace-events.patch
queue-6.6/nfs-fix-a-deadlock-involving-nfs_release_folio.patch
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-24 7:22 [PATCH 6.6.y] pNFS: Fix a deadlock when returning a delegation during open() Li hongliang
2026-03-19 11:12 ` gregkh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026031952-reward-raft-9f4a@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=1468888505@139.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=bcodding@hammerspace.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=wangzhaolong@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox