From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFE0533A70E; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781630579; cv=none; b=UqM74cW+RyddfdkQM+0oxcTYRHt7w5E+yr/DgNqOWVoOSa1mxe44/kpwliTcxS1Wc1AupIXXbLH7KNZcCmB7L9CZT1ejTcsSpE2YniCztNW+It+kx+gqJKRPqKkApvpG1eV77Irr9tJefB8F3kMtDSWZLqNpxCa8gtBviuWwyg8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781630579; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ftRVRZjVLrkS7hkUsqoHKwGSl/D5bAlBrEeKFtBpPKw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=quNykcRzHQ69+QzemTUhKwnaQ9UhgMzl+yVFFs/zORMCsnFy3wjy4oLP5Zu2sTqYxQd42GnBCVuZz8WDTv8RQgQPJQlB+XUSsqYxpuJB9zJ86k7/TnQeE8fcQ+gpTIjUtoi3Qerbg/Nlem5jGikqVCR8sFP/lcF6fPr6AAYfAN8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=nMsm4MDB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="nMsm4MDB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04FE61F000E9; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:22:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1781630578; bh=3UMz4hVpUAjgWNz3OTSO8dy6qBpJh9Jgr2axGBqn1KQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=nMsm4MDB4IQPUX7prLk2j2vMKaUeC3FKAe3lDCQQItYEddcJAo8e/MCaX+ab/2f/w qgMxzXRHUG/T0FiA1Cxwo5D91HgMZE2eo4DeFy8kjWfx/MVTQmMHeStfM9zki38eXm 358T00kW6GYLMv740iKXd55c6LtEoPBl/1Piid+M= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Paul Chaignon , Shung-Hsi Yu , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.1 056/522] Revert "selftests/bpf: Workaround strict bpf_lsm return value check." Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 20:23:23 +0530 Message-ID: <20260616145128.402219260@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 In-Reply-To: <20260616145125.307082728@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260616145125.307082728@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Paul Chaignon This reverts commit a1914d146622 ("selftests/bpf: Workaround strict bpf_lsm return value check"). It seems it was picked up by mistake. It applies to a selftest that didn't exist in 6.1. The whole selftest was then backported as a stable-dep in commit 45108a7b4866 ("selftests/bpf: Add tests for _opts variants of bpf_*_get_fd_by_id()") (reverted as well in the next patch). The new selftest covers the bpf_*_get_fd_by_id structures. Those don't exist in 6.1 so the selftest shouldn't either. Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c index 568816307f7125..f5ac5f3e89196f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ int BPF_PROG(check_access, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) if (fmode & FMODE_WRITE) return -EACCES; - barrier(); return 0; } -- 2.53.0