From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F8F43C2B82; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781622008; cv=none; b=OdV82eH/g3pCwi82tq20+cL0PlmeK8OOTpa6d36Afb5oXFjo4IRu50v6KKXw+EMs/i8QgbwmNXuDqEYE2/t64fAnm4Aj3kxQ4iwxQJFo9LzR0U2pKPVJr/y/qzXFrEBqqjenTPAmP4O97uLgnu8Pt2AgumTqxEjyT7AqWbMjxho= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781622008; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5jP/zQ10W0PfB7FAZyxMPuxlZvSzZ+qiPmOcK+bOmUg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=KHjQR7EjUUBelhpUqqKasG+UbonnYS0iF3XbrQ1ydlpDruh+fdOpXHMe9OGC1pg6f6eYiE0Gk+zvqRndGywlhp9+Q7wLNR5C0KnMB3R32U/7x6VtDvftulaIpEn3RTMMUdI1SSkFqg+TuGMxcV2Q3T7rcCA1sce04waBcK3zebg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=UB4gERkk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="UB4gERkk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 480081F00A3F; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:00:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1781622007; bh=6IEQe+pvzUENqXuyOy7c5F1iT15Wx2j/xJOScqJn0g8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=UB4gERkkuG95fZxH3jAW13UWOO1Yx1WplJjiWTCPYml0A36Oc2xXUEk/C0NXvAWtP Cj1cSUJdn1cBFKzzKZKFl5xFchtWNfPnhG5J13osZB/OHlvxz/2U8Ed6f95bN77YIw AjaWRlJM9zS9ND18GZ5ibRcIBpoMZmtEfcLKE6bU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Jeff Layton , Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>, "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" Subject: [PATCH 7.1 1/8] fs/fcntl: fix SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order in fasync signaling Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 20:28:46 +0530 Message-ID: <20260616145523.379523542@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 In-Reply-To: <20260616145523.335696673@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260616145523.335696673@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 7.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn> commit 00633c4683828acd5256fa8d5163f440d74bbe71 upstream. A SOFTIRQ-safe to SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order deadlock can occur in send_sigio() and send_sigurg() when a process group receives a signal. When FASYNC is configured for a process group (PIDTYPE_PGID), both functions use read_lock(&tasklist_lock) to traverse the task list. However, they are frequently called from softirq context: - send_sigio() via input_inject_event -> kill_fasync - send_sigurg() via tcp_check_urg -> sk_send_sigurg (NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) The deadlock is caused by the rwlock writer fairness mechanism: 1. CPU 0 (process context) holds read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in do_wait(). 2. CPU 1 (process context) attempts write_lock(&tasklist_lock) in fork() or exit() and spins, which blocks all new readers. 3. CPU 0 is interrupted by a softirq (e.g., TCP URG packet reception). 4. The softirq calls send_sigurg() and attempts to acquire read_lock(&tasklist_lock), deadlocking because CPU 1 is waiting. Since PID hashing and do_each_pid_task() traversals are already RCU-protected, the read_lock on tasklist_lock is no longer strictly required for safe traversal. Fix this by replacing tasklist_lock with rcu_read_lock(), aligning the process group signaling path with the single-PID path. This also mitigates a potential remote denial of service vector via TCP URG packets. Lockdep splat: ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected [...] Chain exists of: &dev->event_lock --> &f_owner->lock --> tasklist_lock Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(tasklist_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&dev->event_lock); lock(&f_owner->lock); lock(&dev->event_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260523135210.590928-1-w15303746062@163.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/fcntl.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/fs/fcntl.c +++ b/fs/fcntl.c @@ -929,11 +929,11 @@ void send_sigio(struct fown_struct *fown send_sigio_to_task(p, fown, fd, band, type); rcu_read_unlock(); } else { - read_lock(&tasklist_lock); + rcu_read_lock(); do_each_pid_task(pid, type, p) { send_sigio_to_task(p, fown, fd, band, type); } while_each_pid_task(pid, type, p); - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); } out_unlock_fown: read_unlock_irqrestore(&fown->lock, flags); @@ -975,11 +975,11 @@ int send_sigurg(struct file *file) send_sigurg_to_task(p, fown, type); rcu_read_unlock(); } else { - read_lock(&tasklist_lock); + rcu_read_lock(); do_each_pid_task(pid, type, p) { send_sigurg_to_task(p, fown, type); } while_each_pid_task(pid, type, p); - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); } out_unlock_fown: read_unlock_irqrestore(&fown->lock, flags);