From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 171F846D08F; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784661655; cv=none; b=mL2NDZnaiYjt3wfN+jiTsljL4d9xAnkNlzel2LDClxxG59dQtcnez+sLMhUwqzXubk4o049BrBCSuYMKb67M41ClFS8EcAOt6UEZSWml5P6xa0QD705vn92zBeuNCtnzZFqV9roxjBFT4iPp8jd4q4JzH4CX6qn8dSmoK0yFb4s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784661655; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2DUEu5osU0Pzp7V4bfTj4T+dRel4zF5Kxn4ZZcSUHm8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=UiC1EMwxCzzCez9RaDP7Ihsb5kd6ReQERSnET2yL41Q+1TlPcTVdOnBy3SqGi22JFz3CPh4b+t0CyDla3Zmsz2wNrYiZLjX6AU0gWo+pr0BsaJ6P/pqHQulZLytZaww1E/u8PAHf6YeXtHK5o0QRHohg3VRgX8CakZGX17Q96N0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=gmH/Tjjk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="gmH/Tjjk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B9DC1F000E9; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:20:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1784661654; bh=4sGBP4SIBx0bTAs14d4CMlfnMPxbK4+JHPh/wS/3TBw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=gmH/TjjkpbO4Tmmz2QvvVd34FpJECJMSCK8rO3sm8e1olAW5R9XG3T7+gk6xhnqpP htjs3b7h7t5XDLdU+/rPbmA7ZdIMgHfBpzc3rngnudHeRqnrasd/JVxOCY8ClF5FkF srtidmMTFxfnwn1gB/KT2U1BPW1ee7jbB81A90eI= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Lifeng Zheng , Viresh Kumar , Zhongqiu Han , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.12 0149/1276] cpufreq: conservative: Simplify frequency limit handling Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:09:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20260721152449.437511536@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.55.0 In-Reply-To: <20260721152446.065700225@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260721152446.065700225@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Lifeng Zheng [ Upstream commit 3494dff89779b73a6c70481c982e0e96d336454a ] cs_dbs_update() performs explicit checks against policy->min/max before updating the target frequency. These checks are redundant as __cpufreq_driver_target() already clamps the requested frequency to the valid policy limits. Remove the unnecessary boundary checks and simplify the update logic. This also fixes an issue introduced by commit 00bfe05889e9 ("cpufreq: conservative: Decrease frequency faster for deferred updates"), where stale target comparisons could cause frequency updates to be skipped entirely after deferred adjustments. Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260421123545.1745998-1-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com/ Fixes: 00bfe05889e9 ("cpufreq: conservative: Decrease frequency faster for deferred updates") Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng Co-developed-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Reviewed-by: Zhongqiu Han Link: https://patch.msgid.link/292e6d937890f135e30ec0d2107eaad47cb9a976.1779423281.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 12 +----------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c index c51b6d1ebcd562..3550c22e5d839e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c @@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (load > dbs_data->up_threshold) { dbs_info->down_skip = 0; - /* if we are already at full speed then break out early */ - if (requested_freq == policy->max) - goto out; - requested_freq += freq_step; if (requested_freq > policy->max) requested_freq = policy->max; @@ -124,13 +120,7 @@ static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) /* Check for frequency decrease */ if (load < cs_tuners->down_threshold) { - /* - * if we cannot reduce the frequency anymore, break out early - */ - if (requested_freq == policy->min) - goto out; - - if (requested_freq > freq_step) + if (requested_freq > policy->min + freq_step) requested_freq -= freq_step; else requested_freq = policy->min; -- 2.53.0