From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C6B434D4DE; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 01:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788140367; cv=none; b=Yc0l/m5KnD14s0zKJdHo1GZxneMPQF2/B23LndXLQxuuILk39DDT27vyWX4tGZ9OQvdIizDjATn48I9wKtt6obEzuLOEiglyvRkIJpqNGw2fwFL9Zsz2qXIJ31lH1k8mf84NAw0EBu91KwuCgx+KxjyrDc968Tljy03flNQDr0o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788140367; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o0s6nuGRf7iEuMmxTv+A9zdSxmJAbCmH/UvGy4znr0Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=AA7sazou2K4jse/za1Q+kCRrLUj7HxYc+nRfh9KDPgXt8NcNvIpTuMThDM58k2u/K3ZSkovWwdXclEOAhUG7w/5CK6d4JaQgmnAiEAmcMYbeSfEoaOuCidxccL8ed3zCt4extw5cIcdz+3vxEVucfMWHodgFH+kMdp0SzJ/Yxvw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kQqTO6sG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kQqTO6sG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E02B1F000E9; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 01:39:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788140366; bh=3Vo60SsofioewEk/hakNWs8htBGiu8cleHsJFO70b9k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=kQqTO6sGCXp4phAaQvyQH4iaPj/4dh/fGyL+sJEmVMU4H6EroVzErW6MQgR7nmaQJ MBJ9D9CthNJRGKszokB0T7bwWhWV1oZzmcNNtdw9nrYqmEj18HSluT2C5vYcHbDbtn eD0L4BNU27tA8+AOcPtx7yPqMHhTQcIAdiTfw0T4IFY/tNBB1hX6MtM3ErLuJrJQzX 41ap+iEmyCv6/6r+fR9rCDTOrbFSzU9bhYPXMq+yDi76ryiTrtil8aMuQBZv9d2+gv 7Op3UTphyh/vwRqsorz5QxNCbrbDJ18SOrya+nEpZKNGc7NJOUQoEE7NcAU8OZPfYV GwZ6qr13Ur7sw== From: Sasha Levin To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sasha Levin , patches@lists.linux.dev, Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Vincent Donnefort , "Steven Rostedt (Google)" , Vegard Nossum , Harshit Mogalapalli Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 184/220] ring-buffer: Make ring_buffer_{un}map() simpler with guard(mutex) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 21:39:09 -0400 Message-ID: <20260830194800.0004-1-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <69d0d491-b9ef-4e85-93ba-d500de1ae6e9@oracle.com> References: <69d0d491-b9ef-4e85-93ba-d500de1ae6e9@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > I ran an AI-assisted backport review and then checked c7f40b670e5c > against the 6.12.y code. The refactor changes the first-map exit in > ring_buffer_map() from: > > return err; > > to: > > return 0; Queued for 6.12, thanks. -- Thanks, Sasha