[PATCH 6.6 43/91] nvme: rename nvme_sc_to_pr_err to nvme_status_to_pr_err

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

6.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Weiwen Hu <huweiwen@linux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit 22f19a584d7045e0509f103dbc5c0acfd6415163 ]

This should better match its semantic.  "sc" is used in the NVMe spec to
specifically refer to the last 8 bits in the status field. We should not
reuse "sc" here.

Signed-off-by: Weiwen Hu <huweiwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 4a3f00262a04 ("nvmet-tcp: bound SGL data length before allocating command buffers")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/pr.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pr.c
@@ -72,12 +72,12 @@ static int nvme_send_ns_pr_command(struc
 	return nvme_submit_sync_cmd(ns->queue, c, data, data_len);
 }
 
-static int nvme_sc_to_pr_err(int nvme_sc)
+static int nvme_status_to_pr_err(int status)
 {
-	if (nvme_is_path_error(nvme_sc))
+	if (nvme_is_path_error(status))
 		return PR_STS_PATH_FAILED;
 
-	switch (nvme_sc & 0x7ff) {
+	switch (status & 0x7ff) {
 	case NVME_SC_SUCCESS:
 		return PR_STS_SUCCESS;
 	case NVME_SC_RESERVATION_CONFLICT:
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static int nvme_pr_command(struct block_
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	return nvme_sc_to_pr_err(ret);
+	return nvme_status_to_pr_err(ret);
 }
 
 static int nvme_pr_register(struct block_device *bdev, u64 old,
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ retry:
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	return nvme_sc_to_pr_err(ret);
+	return nvme_status_to_pr_err(ret);
 }
 
 static int nvme_pr_read_keys(struct block_device *bdev,