From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794591039; b=pv5CfVuVGJ1XKGbK0CnSjXq9gBOkWJKZKmxAAbBw0zqaYfqzGltCV3EV80PTmvqk0W5W o62mATtgyogFU6w/hvgjw1J0/YNImucxm8vlnB5YYO026qBrCJDJw+CRHr5emeijHZXAp jrM/+TxEUUtEeKXAFNVAw9kbW27Vb64DfEKfLdHo7Uuk5TRlGr6HACRv7+lX2AeWH4Jos rdRxkB6usKLlxBpHU9FvcObLcLudorub1JvpajMoJBAgg9kgIjNmRSA7RmoUA9McPa1y7 awxEjT+FLFy3cBQKuNkEQQUfyxBIqFD1d1IL6E91uIiunEQJGsMJZu+KhPiJEstt1QA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794591039; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer: In-Reply-To:References:User-Agent:X-stable:X-Patchwork-Hint: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=U+VNO65F85KSJplptdEXIaFvXcIWyWkGpQldrm8z0Vc=; b=u2vNIfxzWQ4C59vmSycGxCSA1i37VUWsmh1b94XJ6iFt8Hvb2GPWZrkJ6Sqcy0t3kkyB RKD4i/ah1mS5OUVkEXkOUvEU0huJA5ppVUa6pW78/zrWtT+tYWKlGL5+fLa3Hw6LrC7P6 ExM9iRi/3yPc7xDkWGQfBzYdIcjIeZpWst2b5dXx8+0DUikHA+pYw2WaoBCnOX5BHXMmh CVMyTrXPYtzkaCVfhYeMN81LmHH1ED4KGWfEcqWhyOi1IA8tL7YjGILlE65RnFNGZifXu zx3wyQw/irruYfu/2d7PBz1WUCv4hJXgOS1dFYGiiF6+MFhhVJQrc/x7pDZ83TzO7jg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=IzNUO82b; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99169606B80D; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 17:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=IzNUO82b Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45A531F000C7; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 17:30:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1794591039; bh=U+VNO65F85KSJplptdEXIaFvXcIWyWkGpQldrm8z0Vc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=IzNUO82bph42MXuuoSBoz6Z3ndZlNu1h+z1TGX806HsfqB5sG5+hm+Ll9fPw0S2DT UMC6ojnsxQWF+dNwqv4zqB5veghZZYxEc9fy2ujqLdII1G6WU3H4doIXvDvNSu1Gu1 9PZdGfmNEWOEf2SztQw0qvKdwzM/gwEMxOxTaVQg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Yu Zhang , Jakub Kicinski , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.12 205/670] ptp: fix use-after-free in extts_fifo_show() reading tsevqs unlocked Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 10:46:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20261113153818.898141907@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.56.0 In-Reply-To: <20261113153811.177190860@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20261113153811.177190860@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Yu Zhang [ Upstream commit 603a0c40d414ea12509fc45f2b930449a8d4aad2 ] extts_fifo_show() walks ptp->tsevqs with list_count_nodes() and then list_first_entry() without holding ptp->tsevqs_lock, the spinlock that "protects tsevqs from concurrent access". Every other accessor of the list honours it: ptp_open() (list_add_tail), ptp_release() (list_del followed by kfree of the per-fd queue), ptp_clock_release() and ptp_clock_event() all take tsevqs_lock. extts_fifo_show() is the only one that does not. A per-fd timestamp queue is appended to tsevqs on open("/dev/ptpN") and removed and freed on close(), both under tsevqs_lock: scoped_guard(spinlock_irq, &ptp->tsevqs_lock) list_del(&queue->qlist); bitmap_free(queue->mask); kfree(queue); So a read of /sys/class/ptp/ptpN/fifo running concurrently with a close() of a /dev/ptpN fd can have list_count_nodes() walk into the queue that close() is removing and freeing, dereferencing freed memory (use-after-free) or a poisoned list pointer. Take tsevqs_lock around the list walk. The fifo only ever draws from the first queue, which is the registration-time queue created in ptp_clock_register() and freed only in ptp_clock_release(); that cannot run while the sysfs attribute is being read, so the dequeue from queue->buf under queue->lock may stay outside tsevqs_lock and the lock order is unchanged. Fixes: d26ab5a35ad9 ("ptp: Replace timestamp event queue with linked list") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261026100535.68114-1-yuz08559@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/ptp/ptp_sysfs.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_sysfs.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_sysfs.c index 200eaf5006968..0d4b081daf639 100644 --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_sysfs.c @@ -80,13 +80,17 @@ static ssize_t extts_fifo_show(struct device *dev, size_t qcnt; int cnt = 0; + spin_lock_irqsave(&ptp->tsevqs_lock, flags); cnt = list_count_nodes(&ptp->tsevqs); - if (cnt <= 0) + if (cnt <= 0) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ptp->tsevqs_lock, flags); goto out; + } /* The sysfs fifo will always draw from the fist queue */ queue = list_first_entry(&ptp->tsevqs, struct timestamp_event_queue, qlist); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ptp->tsevqs_lock, flags); memset(&event, 0, sizeof(event)); spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->lock, flags); -- 2.53.0