patches.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
	"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Anil Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 27/31] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 08:59:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <446cf50b-bae0-4e5d-887d-3769eae4b824@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429003359.375508-28-tony.luck@intel.com>

Hi Tony,

On 4/28/25 5:33 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> There are now three meanings for "number of RMIDs":
> 
> 1) The number for legacy features enumerated by CPUID leaf 0xF. This
> is the maximum number of distinct values that can be loaded into the
> IA32_PQR_ASSOC MSR. Note that systems with Sub-NUMA Cluster mode enabled
> will force scaling down the CPUID enumerated value by the number of SNC
> nodes per L3-cache.
> 
> 2) The number of registers in MMIO space for each event. This
> is enumerated in the XML files and is the value placed into
> event_group::num_rmids.

This is unexpected and not true at this point. Instead this is something
this patch introduces ... kindof since the value is obtained from XML file
and then "adjusted". 

> 
> 3) The number of "h/w counters" (this isn't a strictly accurate
> description of how things work, but serves as a useful analogy that
> does describe the limitations) feeding to those MMIO registers. This
> is enumerated in telemetry_region::num_rmids returned from the call to
> intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature()
> 
> Event groups with insufficient "h/w counter" to track all RMIDs are
> difficult for users to use, since the system may reassign "h/w counters"
> as any time. This means that users cannot reliably collect two consecutive
> event counts to compute the rate at which events are occurring.
> 
> Ignore such under-resourced event groups unless the user explicitly
> requests to enable them using the "rdt=" Linux boot argument.
> 
> Scan all enabled event groups and assign the RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG
> resource "num_rmids" value to the smallest of these values to ensure
> that all resctrl groups have equal monitor capabilities.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h  |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c   |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 92cbba9d82a8..31499bcd2065 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>  
>  #define RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL		BIT_ULL(62)
>  
> +extern int rdt_num_system_rmids;
> +
>  /*
>   * With the above fields in use 62 bits remain in MSR_IA32_QM_CTR for
>   * data to be returned. The counter width is discovered from the hardware
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> index aacaedcc7b74..eec5eb625f13 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/cleanup.h>
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/minmax.h>
>  #include <linux/resctrl.h>
>  
>  /* Temporary - delete from final version */
> @@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ struct pmt_event {
>   * @pfg:		The pmt_feature_group for this event group
>   * @name:		Name for this group
>   * @guid:		Unique number per XML description file
> + * @num_rmids:		Number of RMIDS supported by this group

Can append (from XML file, then adjusted ... ?)

>   * @mmio_size:		Number of bytes of mmio registers for this group
>   * @pkginfo:		Per-package MMIO addresses
>   * @num_events:		Number of events in this group
> @@ -60,6 +62,7 @@ struct event_group {
>  	struct pmt_feature_group	*pfg;
>  	char				*name;
>  	int				guid;
> +	int				num_rmids;
>  	int				mmio_size;
>  	struct mmio_info		**pkginfo;
>  	int				num_events;
> @@ -70,6 +73,7 @@ struct event_group {
>  static struct event_group energy_0x26696143 = {
>  	.name		= "energy",
>  	.guid		= 0x26696143,
> +	.num_rmids	= 576,
>  	.mmio_size	= (576 * 2 + 3) * 8,
>  	.num_events	= 2,
>  	.evts				= {
> @@ -82,6 +86,7 @@ static struct event_group energy_0x26696143 = {
>  static struct event_group perf_0x26557651 = {
>  	.name		= "perf",
>  	.guid		= 0x26557651,
> +	.num_rmids	= 576,
>  	.mmio_size	= (576 * 7 + 3) * 8,
>  	.num_events	= 7,
>  	.evts				= {
> @@ -214,6 +219,15 @@ static bool get_pmt_feature(enum pmt_feature_id feature)
>  			if ((*peg)->guid == p->regions[i].guid) {
>  				if (rdt_check_option((*peg)->name, false, true))
>  					return false;
> +				/*
> +				 * Ignore event group with insufficient RMIDs unless the
> +				 * user used the rdt= boot option to specifically ask
> +				 * for it to be enabled.
> +				 */
> +				if (p->regions[i].num_rmids < rdt_num_system_rmids &&
> +				    !rdt_check_option((*peg)->name, true, false))
> +					return false;
> +				(*peg)->num_rmids = p->regions[i].num_rmids;

Does this need a min()? Since this cycles through multiple regions it seems possible that
if the regions support different numbers of RMIDs then the event group's adjustment to
deal with a region with few RMIDs will be undone by a following region with more RMIDs.

>  				ret = configure_events((*peg), p);
>  				if (ret) {
>  					(*peg)->pfg = no_free_ptr(p);

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-08 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29  0:33 [PATCH v4 00/31] x86/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 01/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Drop rdt_mon_features variable Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-08 18:32     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-08 23:44       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 02/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Prepare for more monitor events Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:30   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-09 15:02   ` Peter Newman
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 03/31] fs/resctrl: Clean up rdtgroup_mba_mbps_event_{show,write}() Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 04/31] fs/resctrl: Change how and when events are initialized Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 05/31] fs/resctrl: Set up Kconfig options for telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:32   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-10  9:58   ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-12 14:19     ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 06/31] x86/rectrl: Fake OOBMSM interface Tony Luck
2025-04-30 23:02   ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-08  3:33   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 07/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:36   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 08/31] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization out of domain_add_cpu_mon() Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:37   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 09/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:37   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 10/31] x86/resctrl: Change generic monitor functions to use struct rdt_domain_hdr Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:38   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 11/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 12/31] fs/resctrl: Improve handling for events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-05-08  3:54   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-13  3:19   ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-13 16:20     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-14  9:11       ` Chen, Yu C
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 13/31] fs/resctrl: Add support for additional monitor event display formats Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:49   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-08 20:28     ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-08 23:45       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-09 11:29         ` Dave Martin
2025-05-09 14:46           ` Peter Newman
2025-05-09 16:38             ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-09 16:43             ` Dave Martin
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 14/31] fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:50   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 15/31] x86/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope core monitor Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:50   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 16/31] x86/resctrl: Add first part of telemetry event enumeration Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:53   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 17/31] x86/resctrl: Add second " Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:54   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 18/31] x86/resctrl: Add third " Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:56   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 19/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of Clearwater Forest events Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:54   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 20/31] x86/resctrl: Check for adequate MMIO space Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:56   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 21/31] x86/resctrl: Add fourth part of telemetry event enumeration Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:56   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 22/31] x86/resctrl: Read core telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:57   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 23/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:58   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 24/31] fs/resctrl: Add type define for PERF_PKG files Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 25/31] x86/resctrl: Final steps to enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 26/31] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:58   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 27/31] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:59   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 28/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Fix RMID allocation for multiple monitor resources Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 29/31] fs/resctrl: Add interface for per-resource debug info files Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 30/31] x86/resctrl: Add info/PERF_PKG_MON/status file Tony Luck
2025-04-29  0:33 ` [PATCH v4 31/31] x86/resctrl: Update Documentation for package events Tony Luck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=446cf50b-bae0-4e5d-887d-3769eae4b824@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).