From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Anil Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 27/31] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 08:59:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <446cf50b-bae0-4e5d-887d-3769eae4b824@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429003359.375508-28-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
On 4/28/25 5:33 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> There are now three meanings for "number of RMIDs":
>
> 1) The number for legacy features enumerated by CPUID leaf 0xF. This
> is the maximum number of distinct values that can be loaded into the
> IA32_PQR_ASSOC MSR. Note that systems with Sub-NUMA Cluster mode enabled
> will force scaling down the CPUID enumerated value by the number of SNC
> nodes per L3-cache.
>
> 2) The number of registers in MMIO space for each event. This
> is enumerated in the XML files and is the value placed into
> event_group::num_rmids.
This is unexpected and not true at this point. Instead this is something
this patch introduces ... kindof since the value is obtained from XML file
and then "adjusted".
>
> 3) The number of "h/w counters" (this isn't a strictly accurate
> description of how things work, but serves as a useful analogy that
> does describe the limitations) feeding to those MMIO registers. This
> is enumerated in telemetry_region::num_rmids returned from the call to
> intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature()
>
> Event groups with insufficient "h/w counter" to track all RMIDs are
> difficult for users to use, since the system may reassign "h/w counters"
> as any time. This means that users cannot reliably collect two consecutive
> event counts to compute the rate at which events are occurring.
>
> Ignore such under-resourced event groups unless the user explicitly
> requests to enable them using the "rdt=" Linux boot argument.
>
> Scan all enabled event groups and assign the RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG
> resource "num_rmids" value to the smallest of these values to ensure
> that all resctrl groups have equal monitor capabilities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 92cbba9d82a8..31499bcd2065 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>
> #define RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL BIT_ULL(62)
>
> +extern int rdt_num_system_rmids;
> +
> /*
> * With the above fields in use 62 bits remain in MSR_IA32_QM_CTR for
> * data to be returned. The counter width is discovered from the hardware
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> index aacaedcc7b74..eec5eb625f13 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/minmax.h>
> #include <linux/resctrl.h>
>
> /* Temporary - delete from final version */
> @@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ struct pmt_event {
> * @pfg: The pmt_feature_group for this event group
> * @name: Name for this group
> * @guid: Unique number per XML description file
> + * @num_rmids: Number of RMIDS supported by this group
Can append (from XML file, then adjusted ... ?)
> * @mmio_size: Number of bytes of mmio registers for this group
> * @pkginfo: Per-package MMIO addresses
> * @num_events: Number of events in this group
> @@ -60,6 +62,7 @@ struct event_group {
> struct pmt_feature_group *pfg;
> char *name;
> int guid;
> + int num_rmids;
> int mmio_size;
> struct mmio_info **pkginfo;
> int num_events;
> @@ -70,6 +73,7 @@ struct event_group {
> static struct event_group energy_0x26696143 = {
> .name = "energy",
> .guid = 0x26696143,
> + .num_rmids = 576,
> .mmio_size = (576 * 2 + 3) * 8,
> .num_events = 2,
> .evts = {
> @@ -82,6 +86,7 @@ static struct event_group energy_0x26696143 = {
> static struct event_group perf_0x26557651 = {
> .name = "perf",
> .guid = 0x26557651,
> + .num_rmids = 576,
> .mmio_size = (576 * 7 + 3) * 8,
> .num_events = 7,
> .evts = {
> @@ -214,6 +219,15 @@ static bool get_pmt_feature(enum pmt_feature_id feature)
> if ((*peg)->guid == p->regions[i].guid) {
> if (rdt_check_option((*peg)->name, false, true))
> return false;
> + /*
> + * Ignore event group with insufficient RMIDs unless the
> + * user used the rdt= boot option to specifically ask
> + * for it to be enabled.
> + */
> + if (p->regions[i].num_rmids < rdt_num_system_rmids &&
> + !rdt_check_option((*peg)->name, true, false))
> + return false;
> + (*peg)->num_rmids = p->regions[i].num_rmids;
Does this need a min()? Since this cycles through multiple regions it seems possible that
if the regions support different numbers of RMIDs then the event group's adjustment to
deal with a region with few RMIDs will be undone by a following region with more RMIDs.
> ret = configure_events((*peg), p);
> if (ret) {
> (*peg)->pfg = no_free_ptr(p);
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 0:33 [PATCH v4 00/31] x86/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 01/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Drop rdt_mon_features variable Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-08 18:32 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-08 23:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 02/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Prepare for more monitor events Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-09 15:02 ` Peter Newman
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 03/31] fs/resctrl: Clean up rdtgroup_mba_mbps_event_{show,write}() Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 04/31] fs/resctrl: Change how and when events are initialized Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 05/31] fs/resctrl: Set up Kconfig options for telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-10 9:58 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-12 14:19 ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 06/31] x86/rectrl: Fake OOBMSM interface Tony Luck
2025-04-30 23:02 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-08 3:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 07/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:36 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 08/31] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization out of domain_add_cpu_mon() Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 09/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 10/31] x86/resctrl: Change generic monitor functions to use struct rdt_domain_hdr Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:38 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 11/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:39 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 12/31] fs/resctrl: Improve handling for events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-05-08 3:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-13 3:19 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-13 16:20 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-14 9:11 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 13/31] fs/resctrl: Add support for additional monitor event display formats Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-08 20:28 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-08 23:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-05-09 11:29 ` Dave Martin
2025-05-09 14:46 ` Peter Newman
2025-05-09 16:38 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-09 16:43 ` Dave Martin
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 14/31] fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 15/31] x86/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope core monitor Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 16/31] x86/resctrl: Add first part of telemetry event enumeration Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 17/31] x86/resctrl: Add second " Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 18/31] x86/resctrl: Add third " Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 19/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of Clearwater Forest events Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 20/31] x86/resctrl: Check for adequate MMIO space Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 21/31] x86/resctrl: Add fourth part of telemetry event enumeration Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 22/31] x86/resctrl: Read core telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:57 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 23/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 24/31] fs/resctrl: Add type define for PERF_PKG files Tony Luck
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 25/31] x86/resctrl: Final steps to enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 26/31] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 27/31] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources Tony Luck
2025-05-08 15:59 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 28/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Fix RMID allocation for multiple monitor resources Tony Luck
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 29/31] fs/resctrl: Add interface for per-resource debug info files Tony Luck
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 30/31] x86/resctrl: Add info/PERF_PKG_MON/status file Tony Luck
2025-04-29 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 31/31] x86/resctrl: Update Documentation for package events Tony Luck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=446cf50b-bae0-4e5d-887d-3769eae4b824@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).