Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/438] 6.12.43-rc2 review

[Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 02:31:21PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.43 release.
> There are 438 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:27:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build reference: v6.12.43
Compiler version: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.3.0
Assembler version: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.44

Configuration file workarounds:
    "s/CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=.*/CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=0/"

Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed
--------------
Error log:
drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c: In function 'ti_hecc_start':
drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c:386:21: error: implicit declaration of function 'BIT_U32'; did you mean 'BIT_ULL'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  386 |         mbx_mask = ~BIT_U32(HECC_RX_LAST_MBOX);
      |                     ^~~~~~~
      |                     BIT_ULL

There is no BIT_U32 in v6.12.y. The same build error is seen in v6.15.11,
which is also missing the definition of BIT_U32. Odd that no one seems
to have noticed this. Am I missing something ?

Guenter