From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>,
Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Compute the STE only once for each master
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:57:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7-v4-c93b774edcc4+42d2b-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0-v4-c93b774edcc4+42d2b-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com>
Currently arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev() iterates over every SID and
computes from scratch an identical STE. Every SID should have the same STE
contents. Turn this inside out so that the STE is supplied by the caller
and arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev() simply installs it to every SID.
This is possible now that the STE generation does not inform what sequence
should be used to program it.
This allows splitting the STE calculation up according to the call site,
which following patches will make use of, and removes the confusing NULL
domain special case that only supported arm_smmu_detach_dev().
Reviewed-by: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 57 ++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 539ef380f457fa..cf3e348cb9abe1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -1588,35 +1588,6 @@ static void arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target,
STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
}
-static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
- struct arm_smmu_ste *dst)
-{
- struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = master->domain;
- struct arm_smmu_ste target = {};
-
- if (!smmu_domain) {
- if (disable_bypass)
- arm_smmu_make_abort_ste(&target);
- else
- arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(&target);
- arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, dst, &target);
- return;
- }
-
- switch (smmu_domain->stage) {
- case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1:
- arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(&target, master, &master->cd_table);
- break;
- case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
- arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(&target, master, smmu_domain);
- break;
- case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS:
- arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(&target);
- break;
- }
- arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, dst, &target);
-}
-
static void arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes(struct arm_smmu_ste *strtab,
unsigned int nent)
{
@@ -2439,7 +2410,8 @@ arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
}
}
-static void arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
+static void arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master,
+ const struct arm_smmu_ste *target)
{
int i, j;
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
@@ -2456,7 +2428,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
if (j < i)
continue;
- arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(master, sid, step);
+ arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, step, target);
}
}
@@ -2563,6 +2535,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_disable_pasid(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
static void arm_smmu_detach_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ struct arm_smmu_ste target;
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = master->domain;
if (!smmu_domain)
@@ -2576,7 +2549,11 @@ static void arm_smmu_detach_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
master->domain = NULL;
master->ats_enabled = false;
- arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master);
+ if (disable_bypass)
+ arm_smmu_make_abort_ste(&target);
+ else
+ arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(&target);
+ arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master, &target);
/*
* Clearing the CD entry isn't strictly required to detach the domain
* since the table is uninstalled anyway, but it helps avoid confusion
@@ -2591,6 +2568,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
{
int ret = 0;
unsigned long flags;
+ struct arm_smmu_ste target;
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
@@ -2652,7 +2630,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
list_add(&master->domain_head, &smmu_domain->devices);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);
- if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1) {
+ switch (smmu_domain->stage) {
+ case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1:
if (!master->cd_table.cdtab) {
ret = arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(master);
if (ret) {
@@ -2666,9 +2645,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
master->domain = NULL;
goto out_list_del;
}
- }
- arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master);
+ arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(&target, master, &master->cd_table);
+ break;
+ case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
+ arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(&target, master, smmu_domain);
+ break;
+ case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS:
+ arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(&target);
+ break;
+ }
+ arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master, &target);
arm_smmu_enable_ats(master);
goto out_unlock;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 23:57 [PATCH v4 00/16] Update SMMUv3 to the modern iommu API (part 1/3) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make STE programming independent of the callers Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-26 4:03 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-29 19:53 ` Moritz Fischer
2024-01-30 22:42 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-30 23:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Consolidate the STE generation for abort/bypass Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 11:32 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 15:07 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 15:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:50 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 15:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Build the whole STE in arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 11:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Hold arm_smmu_asid_lock during all of attach_dev Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 12:15 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 13:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-13 13:30 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-02-01 12:18 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Compute the STE only once for each master Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not change the STE twice during arm_smmu_attach_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Put writing the context descriptor in the right order Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass smmu_domain to arm_enable/disable_ats() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove arm_smmu_master->domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static IDENTITY domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 18:11 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 18:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-30 8:35 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static BLOCKED domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the identity/blocked domain during release Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass arm_smmu_domain and arm_smmu_device to finalize Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert to domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7-v4-c93b774edcc4+42d2b-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=moritzf@google.com \
--cc=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).