Archive-only list for patches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
	"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Anil Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/26] x86/resctrl: Add first part of telemetry event enumeration
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 17:08:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74e6bc40-7d91-4175-a59f-f16dcb281a7d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250407234032.241215-15-tony.luck@intel.com>

Hi Tony,

The following three patches progress as follows:
x86/resctrl: Add first part ...
x86/resctrl: Second stage ...
x86/resctrl: Third phase ...

Could you please make the language consistent?

On 4/7/25 4:40 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> The OOBMSM driver provides an interface to discover any RMID
> based events for "energy" and "perf" classes.

Please add context about what an RMID based event is.

> 
> Hold onto references to any pmt_feature_groups that resctrl

Please add context about what a 
"pmt_feature_groups" (intended to be pmt_feature_group?) is.

> uses until resctrl exit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h  |  8 ++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c      |  5 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/Makefile    |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 45eabc7919c6..70b63bbc429d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -172,4 +172,12 @@ void __init intel_rdt_mbm_apply_quirk(void);
>  
>  void rdt_domain_reconfigure_cdp(struct rdt_resource *r);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_AET_RESCTRL
> +bool intel_aet_get_events(void);
> +void __exit intel_aet_exit(void);
> +#else
> +static inline bool intel_aet_get_events(void) { return false; }
> +static inline void intel_aet_exit(void) { };
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_RESCTRL_INTERNAL_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index a066a9c54a1f..f0f256a5ac66 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -718,6 +718,9 @@ void resctrl_arch_mount(void)
>  	if (only_once)
>  		return;
>  	only_once = true;
> +
> +	if (!intel_aet_get_events())

hmmm ... keep in mind that this is called without
any locking and thus there may be risk of parallel calls?

Please document how/if this is relying on some fs features to 
ensure there are not two instances running at same time.

> +		return;
>  }
>  
>  enum {
> @@ -1063,6 +1066,8 @@ late_initcall(resctrl_arch_late_init);
>  
>  static void __exit resctrl_arch_exit(void)
>  {
> +	intel_aet_exit();
> +
>  	cpuhp_remove_state(rdt_online);
>  
>  	resctrl_exit();
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8e531ad279b5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Resource Director Technology(RDT)
> + * - Intel Application Energy Telemetry
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2025 Intel Corporation
> + *
> + * Author:
> + *    Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt)   "resctrl: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> +#include "fake_intel_aet_features.h"
This include can be marked as "Temporary" to highlight that it
will not stay.

Please separate headers into blocks and sort alphabetically.

> +#include <linux/intel_vsec.h>
> +#include <linux/resctrl.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>

Are all these headers used in code below?

> +
> +#include "internal.h"
> +
> +static struct pmt_feature_group *feat_energy;
> +static struct pmt_feature_group *feat_perf;
> +
> +DEFINE_FREE(intel_pmt_put_feature_group, struct pmt_feature_group *,	\
> +	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T))					\
> +		intel_pmt_put_feature_group(_T))
> +
> +/*
> + * Ask OOBMSM discovery driver for all the RMID based telemetry groups
> + * that it supports.
> + */
> +bool intel_aet_get_events(void)
> +{
> +	struct pmt_feature_group *p1 __free(intel_pmt_put_feature_group) = NULL;
> +	struct pmt_feature_group *p2 __free(intel_pmt_put_feature_group) = NULL;
> +	bool use_p1, use_p2;
> +
> +	p1 = intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature(FEATURE_PER_RMID_ENERGY_TELEM);
> +	p2 = intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature(FEATURE_PER_RMID_PERF_TELEM);
> +	use_p1 = !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p1);
> +	use_p2 = !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p2);
> +
> +	if (!use_p1 && !use_p2)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (use_p1)
> +		feat_energy = no_free_ptr(p1);
> +	if (use_p2)
> +		feat_perf = no_free_ptr(p2);

This reminds me of something I read recently .... "There's a rule in computer
programming that objects appear zero, once, or many times. So code accordingly."
Not expecting a change .... just finding it amusing.

> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +void __exit intel_aet_exit(void)
> +{
> +	if (feat_energy)
> +		intel_pmt_put_feature_group(feat_energy);
> +	if (feat_perf)
> +		intel_pmt_put_feature_group(feat_perf);
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/Makefile
> index c56d3acf8ac7..74c3b2333dde 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL)		+= core.o rdtgroup.o monitor.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL)		+= ctrlmondata.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_AET_RESCTRL)		+= intel_aet.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_AET_RESCTRL)		+= fake_intel_aet_features.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RESCTRL_FS_PSEUDO_LOCK)	+= pseudo_lock.o
>  

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-19  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-07 23:40 [PATCH v3 00/26] x86/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 01/26] fs/resctrl: Simplify allocation of mon_data structures Tony Luck
2025-04-18 21:13   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 02/26] fs-x86/resctrl: Prepare for more monitor events Tony Luck
2025-04-18 21:17   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 03/26] fs/resctrl: Change how events are initialized Tony Luck
2025-04-18 21:22   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 04/26] fs/resctrl: Set up Kconfig options for telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-04-18 21:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 05/26] x86/rectrl: Fake OOBMSM interface Tony Luck
2025-04-18 21:27   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 06/26] fs-x86/rectrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-04-18 21:40   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 07/26] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization out of domain_add_cpu_mon() Tony Luck
2025-04-18 21:51   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-21 20:01     ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-22 18:18       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 08/26] x86/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-04-18 21:53   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 09/26] x86/resctrl: Change generic monitor functions to use struct rdt_domain_hdr Tony Luck
2025-04-18 22:42   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 10/26] fs/resctrl: Improve handling for events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-04-18 22:54   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-21 20:28     ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-22 18:19       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-23  0:51         ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-23  3:37           ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-23 13:27         ` Peter Newman
2025-04-23 15:47           ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 11/26] fs/resctrl: Add support for additional monitor event display formats Tony Luck
2025-04-18 23:02   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-21 19:34     ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-22 18:20       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 12/26] fs/resctrl: Add hook for architecture code to set monitor event attributes Tony Luck
2025-04-18 23:11   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-21 19:50     ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-22 18:20       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 13/26] fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-04-18 23:47   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 14/26] x86/resctrl: Add first part of telemetry event enumeration Tony Luck
2025-04-19  0:08   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 15/26] x86/resctrl: Second stage " Tony Luck
2025-04-19  0:30   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 16/26] x86/resctrl: Third phase " Tony Luck
2025-04-19  0:45   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 17/26] x86/resctrl: Build a lookup table for each resctrl event id Tony Luck
2025-04-19  0:48   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 18/26] x86/resctrl: Add code to read core telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-04-19  1:53   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 19/26] x86/resctrl: Sanity check telemetry RMID values Tony Luck
2025-04-19  5:14   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 20/26] x86/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope core monitor Tony Luck
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 21/26] fs-x86/resctrl: Handle RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG in domain create/delete Tony Luck
2025-04-19  5:22   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 22/26] fs/resctrl: Add type define for PERF_PKG files Tony Luck
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 23/26] fs/resctrl: Add new telemetry event id and structures Tony Luck
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 24/26] x86/resctrl: Final steps to enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 25/26] fs-x86/resctrl: Add detailed descriptions for Clearwater Forest events Tony Luck
2025-04-19  5:30   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-07 23:40 ` [PATCH v3 26/26] x86/resctrl: Update Documentation for package events Tony Luck
2025-04-19  5:40   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-18 21:13 ` [PATCH v3 00/26] x86/resctrl telemetry monitoring Reinette Chatre
2025-04-21 18:57   ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-21 22:59     ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-22 16:20       ` Luck, Tony
2025-04-22 21:30         ` Reinette Chatre
2025-04-19  5:47 ` Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74e6bc40-7d91-4175-a59f-f16dcb281a7d@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox