From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
"Drew Fustini" <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 20/31] fs/resctrl: Refactor Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) in mkdir/rmdir code flow
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 15:12:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <860ded3d-2003-4d72-9013-a5fe97657934@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aObUZU8rnWIDR_tH@agluck-desk3>
Hi Tony,
On 10/8/25 2:15 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 10:12:36AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> On 10/6/25 4:10 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 04:58:45PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>>> On 9/25/25 1:03 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
>>
>>>>> @@ -3253,7 +3267,7 @@ static int mkdir_mondata_subdir(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>>>> ret = rdtgroup_kn_set_ugid(kn);
>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>> goto out_destroy;
>>>>> - ret = mon_add_all_files(kn, hdr, r, prgrp, hdr->id, snc_mode);
>>>>> + ret = mon_add_all_files(kn, hdr, r, prgrp, domid, snc_mode);
>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>> goto out_destroy;
>>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> mkdir_mondata_subdir(), similar to __mon_event_count(), is now unreasonably
>>>> complicated. Just like in that earlier change this inconsistently adds
>>>> RDT_RESOURCE_L3 checks, not to separate L3 code but instead to benefit PERF_PKG
>>>> enabling to reach the handful of lines needed by it.
>>>> Here too I think the best way forward is to split mkdir_mondata_subdir().
>>>>
>>>> rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp() may also do with a split ... most of the
>>>> code within it is dedicated to SNC and mon_rmdir_one_subdir() only exists
>>>> because of SNC ... any other usage can just call kernfs_remove_by_name(), no?
>>>>
>>>> SNC is already complicated enabling and I think that PERF_PKG trying to wedge
>>>> itself into that is just too confusing. I expect separating this should simplify
>>>> this a lot.
>>>
>>> Ok. Splitting these makes sense. I'm terrible at naming. So I
>>> tentatively have:
>>>
>>> static int mkdir_mondata_subdir(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>> struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr,
>>> struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdtgroup *prgrp)
>>> {
>>> lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>>>
>>> if (r->mon_scope == RESCTRL_L3_NODE)
>>> return mkdir_mondata_subdir_snc(parent_kn, hdr, r, prgrp);
>>> else
>>> return mkdir_mondata_subdir_normal(parent_kn, hdr, r, prgrp);
>>> }
>>>
>>> and:
>>>
>>> static void rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp(struct rdt_resource *r,
>>> struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr)
>>> {
>>> if (r->mon_scope == RESCTRL_L3_NODE)
>>> rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp_snc(r, hdr);
>>> else
>>> rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp_normal(r, hdr);
>>> }
>>>
>>> Better suggestions gratefully accepted.
>>
>> It is not quite obvious to me how it all will turn out from here with the
>> addition of support for PERF_PKG. By just considering the above I think
>> that it helps to match the naming pattern with partners,
>> for example rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp() as you have that matches
>> mkdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp() that is not listed here. The problem is
>> that the new rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp() is L3 specific while
>> mkdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp() remains generic. I thus think that it may make
>> the code easier to follow if the L3 specific functions have _l3_ in the
>> name as you established in patch #8. So perhaps above should be
>> rmdir_l3_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp() instead and then there may be a new
>> rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp() that will be the new generic function
>> that calls the resource specific ones?
>>
>> This could be extended to the new mkdir_mondata_subdir() above where
>> it is named mkdir_l3_mondata_subdir() called by generic mkdir_mondata_subdir()?
>
> Reinette
>
> Making and removing the mon_data directories is the same for non-SNC L3
> and PERF_PKG. The only "l3" connection is that SNC only occurs on L3.
Thank you for clarifying. I was not able to keep this flow in my head.
>
> So maybe my refactor should look like:
>
>
> static int mkdir_mondata_subdir(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
> struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr,
> struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdtgroup *prgrp)
> {
> lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>
> if (r->mon_scope == RESCTRL_L3_NODE)
> return mkdir_mondata_subdir_snc(parent_kn, hdr, r, prgrp);
>
> ... pruned version of original code without SNC bits ...
> }
>
> and:
>
> static void rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp(struct rdt_resource *r,
> struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr)
> {
> if (r->mon_scope == RESCTRL_L3_NODE) {
> rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp_snc(r, hdr);
> return;
> }
>
> ... pruned version of original code without SNC bits ...
> }
Indeed, this will keep the functions generic in the sense that it operates
on all resource types. This looks good since I think once the SNC code is taken
what remains should be easy to follow.
I think it may also help to (in addition to the mon_scope check) add a RDT_RESOURCE_L3
check before the SNC code to keep the pattern that SNC only applies to the L3 resource.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-08 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 20:02 [PATCH v11 00/31] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v11 01/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v11 02/31] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization into new helper function Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v11 03/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:29 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v11 04/31] x86/resctrl: Clean up domain_remove_cpu_ctrl() Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v11 05/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain create/remove using struct rdt_domain_hdr Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-03 22:55 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-06 21:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 06/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Use struct rdt_domain_hdr when reading counters Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-03 22:59 ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 07/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 08/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename some L3 specific functions Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 09/31] fs/resctrl: Make event details accessible to functions when reading events Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 10/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 11/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Support binary fixed point event counters Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 12/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 13/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope monitor Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 14/31] x86/resctrl: Discover hardware telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:35 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 18:19 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-06 21:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 21:47 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-07 20:47 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-08 17:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-08 17:20 ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 15/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of events for guid 0x26696143 and 0x26557651 Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 16/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Add architectural event pointer Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:38 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 17/31] x86/resctrl: Find and enable usable telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 19:58 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-06 21:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 21:54 ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 18/31] fs/resctrl: Refactor L3 specific parts of __mon_event_count() Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 19/31] x86/resctrl: Read telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 20/31] fs/resctrl: Refactor Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) in mkdir/rmdir code flow Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 23:10 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-08 17:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-08 21:15 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-08 22:12 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-10-08 22:29 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-09 2:16 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-09 17:45 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-09 20:29 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-09 21:31 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-09 21:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-09 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-10 0:16 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-10 1:14 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-10 1:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 21/31] x86/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 22/31] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 23/31] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:06 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 24/31] fs/resctrl: Move allocation/free of closid_num_dirty_rmid[] Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 25/31] fs,x86/resctrl: Compute number of RMIDs as minimum across resources Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 26/31] fs/resctrl: Move RMID initialization to first mount Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 27/31] x86/resctrl: Enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 28/31] fs/resctrl: Provide interface to create architecture specific debugfs area Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 29/31] x86/resctrl: Add debugfs files to show telemetry aggregator status Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 30/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Update Documentation for package events Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 31/31] fs/resctrl: Some kerneldoc updates Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 16:54 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-06 21:34 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=860ded3d-2003-4d72-9013-a5fe97657934@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).