From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DC1312DDBF for ; Thu, 2 May 2024 14:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714659245; cv=none; b=HMou/192Y21nIK8rIBY7uwcYEUwwXKvIfBLfM3zJSM5xTqKXZR+KNU4jzoFrFCd/xwQfisMuNnapm793UvjWRyBkkXSZYVLrN3EsZKm0Lpz+FtXRhTSaL12/zZJOPZiDv1eQwTrcUkP3BNkAVJB58wjcI4xsu2zqrSkC1oDoni4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714659245; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LrhW7BqJhH5lsbJc4mRqA52teKIZvgww5PHhZLou6BY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rEHCmIJ7gnjXjHX6M5u9z0GMb6pGg+OmLcNxbbQTjEgQ6qSWP4HmUnezHsNR5yZnRL46H4udjtTAn3zEqaUkqxIgjG40OyXz1B+cA+CrzJcaTy4OxvMjoRYd49SOrMDgT7o1xXBk7rF9HhXRL1Mp6PmpSo1raLWp5oW852GVYKY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=f/Jy2fhF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="f/Jy2fhF" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 6B26347C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1714659242; bh=tfULusTONwVOLuWBlwaVoOCnFSm3EJo4UthwfLmrGdE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=f/Jy2fhFzw4d3qlQu4XxQ8Cv1PQXC4Bb1pZU6OBgOEzNL7Oz6Ve2KH/zyoUQggpO1 xUnj/alWa0OBl5h3/1/V5Xqw0lIBvOtvWQCDTxNa+c5a2oXcGIcBXWXGmlVSExGDPq sP3/rq9UzgehWwaqRLbtmneQssbh5YyqjZx2Hml/iQ6/6OzfcOv84gXCGHx+YDQgMU 0sNvoKT72AgSTS0qTSGqxTVKMHN8+ctGzGkLs4SXFetkWovmenBx+GWWMlX6+WGG5/ M+n7YQi2MHfIcPjXwNhuPkvScYgkE/SlPuqqCJjyQzhdfpCgqlriEPGGMdJzAit10J dSPWly3D5z8TA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B26347C52; Thu, 2 May 2024 14:14:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Pascal Ernster , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/186] 6.6.30-rc1 review In-Reply-To: References: <20240430103058.010791820@linuxfoundation.org> <356c4202-875f-4277-885e-31fdbfd746c1@hardfalcon.net> <2024050218-olive-majestic-f64b@gregkh> Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 08:14:01 -0600 Message-ID: <87sez08fo6.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Pascal Ernster writes: > [2024-05-02 08:50] Greg Kroah-Hartman: >> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:44:30AM +0200, Pascal Ernster wrote: >>> [2024-04-30 12:37] Greg Kroah-Hartman: >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.30 release. >>>> There are 186 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000. >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> Hi, 6.6.30-rc1 is running fine on an x86_64 Haswell VM. >>> >>> Note that I have *not* tested building the kernel documentation, and I >>> suspect that building the documentation with docutils >= 0.21 would likely >>> fail without the patch from >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/faf5fa45-2a9d-4573-9d2e-3930bdc1ed65@gmail.com/ >> >> What is the git id of this in Linus's tree? > > > Hi, > > > AFAICT this has not been merged into either Linus' tree nor into > linux-next nor into docs-next. > > I've added Jonathan Corbet because he seems to be the most likely > maintainer for Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py if I > understand/interpret the MAINTAINERS file correctly. The patch was sent yesterday, so I've not had time to apply it yet. That may happen today. Thanks, jon