From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>,
Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Put writing the context descriptor in the right order
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:57:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9-v4-c93b774edcc4+42d2b-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0-v4-c93b774edcc4+42d2b-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com>
Get closer to the IOMMU API ideal that changes between domains can be
hitless. The ordering for the CD table entry is not entirely clean from
this perspective.
When switching away from a STE with a CD table programmed in it we should
write the new STE first, then clear any old data in the CD entry.
If we are programming a CD table for the first time to a STE then the CD
entry should be programmed before the STE is loaded.
If we are replacing a CD table entry when the STE already points at the CD
entry then we just need to do the make/break sequence.
Lift this code out of arm_smmu_detach_dev() so it can all be sequenced
properly. The only other caller is arm_smmu_release_device() and it is
going to free the cdtable anyhow, so it doesn't matter what is in it.
Reviewed-by: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 29 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index bf5698643afc50..09b40ba35a9cee 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2548,14 +2548,6 @@ static void arm_smmu_detach_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
master->domain = NULL;
master->ats_enabled = false;
- /*
- * Clearing the CD entry isn't strictly required to detach the domain
- * since the table is uninstalled anyway, but it helps avoid confusion
- * in the call to arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc on the next attach (which
- * expects the entry to be empty).
- */
- if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1 && master->cd_table.cdtab)
- arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(master, IOMMU_NO_PASID, NULL);
}
static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
@@ -2632,6 +2624,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
master->domain = NULL;
goto out_list_del;
}
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc() relies on the entry being
+ * invalid to work, clear any existing entry.
+ */
+ ret = arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(master, IOMMU_NO_PASID,
+ NULL);
+ if (ret) {
+ master->domain = NULL;
+ goto out_list_del;
+ }
}
ret = arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(master, IOMMU_NO_PASID, &smmu_domain->cd);
@@ -2641,15 +2644,23 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
}
arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(&target, master, &master->cd_table);
+ arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master, &target);
break;
case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(&target, master, smmu_domain);
+ arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master, &target);
+ if (master->cd_table.cdtab)
+ arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(master, IOMMU_NO_PASID,
+ NULL);
break;
case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS:
arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(&target);
+ arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master, &target);
+ if (master->cd_table.cdtab)
+ arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(master, IOMMU_NO_PASID,
+ NULL);
break;
}
- arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master, &target);
arm_smmu_enable_ats(master);
goto out_unlock;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 23:57 [PATCH v4 00/16] Update SMMUv3 to the modern iommu API (part 1/3) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make STE programming independent of the callers Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-26 4:03 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-29 19:53 ` Moritz Fischer
2024-01-30 22:42 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-30 23:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Consolidate the STE generation for abort/bypass Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 11:32 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 15:07 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 15:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:50 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 15:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Build the whole STE in arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 11:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Hold arm_smmu_asid_lock during all of attach_dev Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 12:15 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 13:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-13 13:30 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Compute the STE only once for each master Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 12:18 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not change the STE twice during arm_smmu_attach_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass smmu_domain to arm_enable/disable_ats() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove arm_smmu_master->domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static IDENTITY domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 18:11 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 18:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-30 8:35 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static BLOCKED domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the identity/blocked domain during release Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass arm_smmu_domain and arm_smmu_device to finalize Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert to domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9-v4-c93b774edcc4+42d2b-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=moritzf@google.com \
--cc=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).