Archive-only list for patches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	galshalom@nvidia.com, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, maorg@nvidia.com, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	tdave@nvidia.com, Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] iommu: Validate that pci_for_each_dma_alias() matches the groups
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 01:00:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9487fde9-ec40-4383-aafe-7ae0811830f5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7-v3-8827cc7fc4e0+23f-pcie_switch_groups_jgg@nvidia.com>



On 9/5/25 2:06 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Directly check that the devices touched by pci_for_each_dma_alias() match
> the groups that were built by pci_device_group(). This helps validate that
Do they have to match, as in equal, or be included ?

> pci_for_each_dma_alias() and pci_bus_isolated() are consistent.
> 
> This should eventually be hidden behind a debug kconfig, but for now it is
> good to get feedback from more diverse systems if there are any problems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index fc3c71b243a850..2bd43a5a9ad8d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ static struct iommu_group *pci_hierarchy_group(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>    *     Once a PCI bus becomes non isolating the entire downstream hierarchy of
>    *     that bus becomes a single group.
>    */
> -struct iommu_group *pci_device_group(struct device *dev)
> +static struct iommu_group *__pci_device_group(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>   	struct iommu_group *group;
> @@ -1734,6 +1734,80 @@ struct iommu_group *pci_device_group(struct device *dev)
>   	WARN_ON(true);
>   	return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>   }
> +
> +struct check_group_aliases_data {
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +	struct iommu_group *group;
> +};
> +
> +static void pci_check_group(const struct check_group_aliases_data *data,
> +			    u16 alias, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_group *group;
> +
> +	group = iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (!group)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (group != data->group)
> +		dev_err(&data->pdev->dev,
> +			"During group construction alias processing needed dev %s alias %x to have the same group but %u != %u\n",
> +			pci_name(pdev), alias, data->group->id, group->id);
> +	iommu_group_put(group);
> +}
> +
> +static int pci_check_group_aliases(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias,
> +				   void *opaque)
> +{
> +	const struct check_group_aliases_data *data = opaque;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Sometimes when a PCIe-PCI bridge is performing transactions on behalf
> +	 * of its subordinate bus it uses devfn=0 on the subordinate bus as the
> +	 * alias. This means that 0 will alias with all devfns on the
> +	 * subordinate bus and so we expect to see those in the same group. pdev
> +	 * in this case is the bridge itself and pdev->bus is the primary bus of
> +	 * the bridge.
> +	 */
> +	if (pdev->bus->number != PCI_BUS_NUM(alias)) {
> +		struct pci_dev *piter = NULL;
> +
> +		for_each_pci_dev(piter) {
> +			if (pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus) ==
> +				    pci_domain_nr(piter->bus) &&
> +			    PCI_BUS_NUM(alias) == pdev->bus->number)
> +				pci_check_group(data, alias, piter);
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		pci_check_group(data, alias, pdev);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct iommu_group *pci_device_group(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct check_group_aliases_data data = {
> +		.pdev = to_pci_dev(dev),
> +	};
> +	struct iommu_group *group;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	group = __pci_device_group(dev);
> +	if (IS_ERR(group))
> +		return group;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The IOMMU driver should use pci_for_each_dma_alias() to figure out
> +	 * what RIDs to program and the core requires all the RIDs to fall
> +	 * within the same group. Validate that everything worked properly.
> +	 */
> +	data.group = group;
> +	pci_for_each_dma_alias(data.pdev, pci_check_group_aliases, &data);
> +	return group;
> +}
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_device_group);
>   
>   /* Get the IOMMU group for device on fsl-mc bus */


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-09  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-05 18:06 [PATCH v3 00/11] Fix incorrect iommu_groups with PCIe ACS Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] PCI: Move REQ_ACS_FLAGS into pci_regs.h as PCI_ACS_ISOLATED Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09  4:08   ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] PCI: Add pci_bus_isolated() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09  4:09   ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-09 19:54   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-09 21:21     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] iommu: Compute iommu_groups properly for PCIe switches Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09  4:14   ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-09 12:18     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09 19:33       ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-09 20:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-09 21:21     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] iommu: Organize iommu_group by member size Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09  4:16   ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] PCI: Add pci_reachable_set() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09 21:03   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-10 16:13     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-11 19:56     ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-15 13:38       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-15 14:32         ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] iommu: Compute iommu_groups properly for PCIe MFDs Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09  4:57   ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-09 13:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09 19:55       ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-09 21:24   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-09 23:20     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-10  1:59     ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-10 17:43       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] iommu: Validate that pci_for_each_dma_alias() matches the groups Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09  5:00   ` Donald Dutile [this message]
2025-09-09 15:35     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09 19:58       ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] PCI: Add the ACS Enhanced Capability definitions Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09  5:01   ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: Enable ACS Enhanced bits for enable_acs and config_acs Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09  5:01   ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] PCI: Check ACS DSP/USP redirect bits in pci_enable_pasid() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09  5:02   ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-09 21:43   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-10 17:34     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-11 19:50       ` Donald Dutile
2026-01-20 18:08   ` Keith Busch
2025-09-05 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] PCI: Check ACS Extended flags for pci_bus_isolated() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09  5:04   ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-15  9:41 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Fix incorrect iommu_groups with PCIe ACS Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-22 22:39 ` Alex Williamson
2025-09-23  1:44   ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-23  2:06     ` Alex Williamson
2025-09-23  2:42       ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-23 22:23         ` Alex Williamson
2025-09-30 15:23           ` Donald Dutile
2025-09-30 16:21             ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9487fde9-ec40-4383-aafe-7ae0811830f5@redhat.com \
    --to=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=galshalom@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tdave@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tony.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox