From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-io1-f53.google.com (mail-io1-f53.google.com [209.85.166.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ADD06828A for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="OgwP+vTq" Received: by mail-io1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7b724fa9d09so213695639f.0 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:03:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1702497814; x=1703102614; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Qb0Chor65PZwcWQrckJnWHpUdZLfS48jXZAf3E2TW4A=; b=OgwP+vTqW+XTj6FVDzuzZmSYqQlQJpZQ2BhK1f7LyWOuPF0Qvv3OCy0gDADenSsx1Z 4UX7DdXxJAN0Icac1zQi+j+WWA5JiaUGkglbQJGaJs/iwhiUAR5S8xCRxP9MrGMOFjKP DEtwxFOR4ZzyyLS/0HCZ5bjikGqKpgR1LAA2F/8rvVG9d5WuCUPz+IOuTf119gdSt/d+ G6XLS7RrQsMTBmKyB0ySkDjHBRzm+n92KlXCz10DOmRCjf5JVQjA79IgcnSWzxNUl/p4 DcV9GtkOr1Or7U41WzhulquUTKLAjT9r46enDPvnXufdzREaNkREt8PjGJ2QIEYRrjV4 frkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702497814; x=1703102614; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Qb0Chor65PZwcWQrckJnWHpUdZLfS48jXZAf3E2TW4A=; b=Mdt2pbnAZoCAOxE0IUnXTsp+C4LeqwOx4usR/A8lcXPo7aJom4jpBl7e942Jf/wsw5 /QpZBXxxOJaU1cKxm9ptMBJVgEUiQQywJJiFicpyzVoHWlXv0LwwH9fk/pPWSp7m/s2x x5VEqWqhk4aJV8AcuQxtFJhRTOsre8Ou6JPML6RxyYQ7X1/BzbyypMx1zP438PCQGP2o XTrsY+R+1Hb9RvN503zZ+gFSTmvp9h/0vE6bm9Hx5vGhA+aX9P6KbYXgFXZ42KEhtMCO TZKcJQ5LSozXXphoOvWDO8u8wfz5kygS6THES44h121y+cW4b8jFFNmc1VlKSHlrFo05 oudg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz7hqffN1wSlWQ+W21BtGm/ztqg971iNuq7Ibv6SwDcj2MqDCd4 iOxwjEt/7eO7jDLxr3UA2mg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFV/vrZBJsnC90uYksGEy6IktKmTZJpQ4bUjLwE2JNNQ4jAgOyDSOJMfeRgZgTnkpY+LF+gxA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:80b:b0:791:1b1c:b758 with SMTP id z11-20020a056602080b00b007911b1cb758mr8380586iow.19.1702497813983; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:03:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:470:42c4:101:b11e:59d6:a73:7922? ([2001:470:42c4:101:b11e:59d6:a73:7922]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g14-20020a02cd0e000000b0046455c93317sm3089544jaq.92.2023.12.13.12.03.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:03:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <97abd266-3848-165e-001c-b5d3e0504323@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:03:32 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 126/244] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix eMMC Data Strobe PD on rk3588 Content-Language: en-US To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Heiko Stuebner , Sasha Levin References: <20231211182045.784881756@linuxfoundation.org> <20231211182051.468710881@linuxfoundation.org> <0584789e-2337-2d94-608c-81c09ca0d6d9@gmail.com> <2023121244-distrust-draw-d67b@gregkh> From: Sam Edwards In-Reply-To: <2023121244-distrust-draw-d67b@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/12/23 03:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 03:05:31PM -0700, Sam Edwards wrote: >> - 6.6 isn't LTS > > It isn't? That's news to me, you might want to check the page: > https://kernel.org/category/releases.html > :) Hi Greg, Haha, oh man... the resource I referenced on Monday was out-of-date and didn't reflect that 6.6 was LTS until ~6 hours after I had clicked "send." Should have seen the look on my face when I got your reply and went to check it again; had a moment of doubting my own grip on reality until I saw the edit history. Serves me right for not relying on kernel.org *first,* I guess! Okay, since 6.6 is LTS, it makes a ton of sense that this patch should be in stable-6.6 and I withdraw my prior apprehensions. Sorry for the confusion. :) > thanks, > > greg k-h Thank you as well, Sam