From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-io1-f53.google.com (mail-io1-f53.google.com [209.85.166.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C32321FBB for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="k1TScJoi" Received: by mail-io1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-79fb64b5265so134731439f.1 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 13:25:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697315126; x=1697919926; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=E5emPS0MjB2QN+kJ9u45m+WJbhux12t/sQVDicjCU/8=; b=k1TScJoiPWNbRO4uKVwKe7Ssq0JsyGZ3Xg6MiLLoC9o/S0slB/uJ9MkVRpPB4ejij/ cxR0vSUoRArholwsCxGQ2lfn6G2EVj6ELpF2A1o6qRB7fdO65icvkJocfqL0TTJ57NGM 9+9x6nLlQTLWmhXcvIxBwrPY193Le6wqn9si4JXTdxvanGc9hm2UmDGedJewgIE6y53c 5UAp5cKATHQTlwP9pqKiSSKgDcQnMMkXAu5g0VM3IWP5xh/gC5FRcjmpIpz3j2eiMGUD SJXsRYZkfL9tBbz3YWTbQblxx4XtGQYZ7nT7NhwP0oR8a5l353aC/4jtTMmzRbQA98HL LpDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697315126; x=1697919926; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=E5emPS0MjB2QN+kJ9u45m+WJbhux12t/sQVDicjCU/8=; b=GqQ5FhXSG2PTIB4A+UeRzcBpTr1DBucEK92Mn6JR1SRTcJ/Mq0xuc/WoU9rYqZInhx 4QThrnnROqip/xJQvSytEuzNp1u5NYCxJtnvREM+uaK/3KxrcuLU0Mn+3WZfvPix+/J6 z6J7EF1xIgB5Tg4sd4SA7N5mnoo30RGtq6hkJLfISRLo2u7E1U0+YL0fBQdpbwxq5Pf/ f1wjD/h1YlMshJvSbFTAUAQ331NgigOgcPBE3tvQEWmpyUFUzFIhqRzwnXOdK1ZAWxS1 j/ftjuOoB5ldRpQaZMQwbkWSgeHkuzbIXZb6mD20G7bRl2Ihm52d6A6GRjeGDN0TvYEs AbkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw5FIOG44Jpn57S5Pk2YYoV2g/czcN8BWGIqVjjMbPJn7Uaecmj tJwWDaS+yQa7nhci8ndYwrU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHQ0wSofw+mCUxwMOTU704LFNtov6E/5kWHV55+P8O46TcQpo0iXIpmVZ9xJ+NCX1B/ckWz1g== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9d10:0:b0:79f:c9ad:19ce with SMTP id j16-20020a5d9d10000000b0079fc9ad19cemr30998453ioj.15.1697315126209; Sat, 14 Oct 2023 13:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:647:4b00:6db0:ed49:22d9:e5d5:b7e4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x4-20020a170902ea8400b001c5076ae6absm5861510plb.126.2023.10.14.13.25.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Oct 2023 13:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.200.91.1.1\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 25/27] x86: enable initial Rust support From: comex In-Reply-To: <5D8CA5EF-F5B0-4911-85B8-A363D9344FA7@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 13:25:12 -0700 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ramon de C Valle , Peter Zijlstra , Kees Cook , Sami Tolvanen , Miguel Ojeda , Miguel Ojeda , Greg Kroah-Hartman , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Jarkko Sakkinen , Alex Gaynor , Wedson Almeida Filho , David Gow , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , Jonathan Corbet , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20220927131518.30000-1-ojeda@kernel.org> <20220927131518.30000-26-ojeda@kernel.org> <20231012104741.GN6307@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <202310121130.256F581823@keescook> <20231013075005.GB12118@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5D8CA5EF-F5B0-4911-85B8-A363D9344FA7@zytor.com> To: "H. Peter Anvin" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.200.91.1.1) > On Oct 13, 2023, at 12:00=E2=80=AFPM, H. Peter Anvin = wrote: >=20 > Transparent unions have been standard C since C99. I don=E2=80=99t think that=E2=80=99s right. Certainly = __attribute__((transparent_union)) is not standard C; are you referring = to a different feature?