From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-vk1-f174.google.com (mail-vk1-f174.google.com [209.85.221.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D39CEC2DA for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 09:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4871e5dbe0cso1085455e0c.1 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 02:34:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1692956049; x=1693560849; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NkOXDPx/S3uX0LGrWHhqDuzgnalOjRvvuzfXBDquIJE=; b=ukX0Pnuivh/o6xISkXG2MwEK0o1GsQV27v/wL8PCYr3K8rw4rCQ89pL5zDucAFhMcb YskOrO04SlvsfelPwM6wi6bo33kueI9hAzLSHaH+rO3C/KdletWIMPRTOYoAyAI3o5Bb gwe8YbDTEL9VB12BM6LBCliW9FWhwvSr325DZcjSigPSeB9JpebjY5rhdU88q9fnhEcr bO6YXtDqCkq7TIBUj7afnMs8Ik0gKHvbzTGASsEDdGmUvf5tgRjCJeHx7rzEZgS3e+cq 5wBCW0y7FKsG5YGqd1KFGnDwwJz8ywHAaQLG/7SL+2BGaFhCrt7m2jYp93piNMTJfTI7 5ZGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692956049; x=1693560849; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=NkOXDPx/S3uX0LGrWHhqDuzgnalOjRvvuzfXBDquIJE=; b=bSXQmU4vzGutHHEOs14mXvOcieM0li9xC6V76r5gNYEGkrp0SUexTbK8N9oJX34VU0 GgEmt0P+ObO9NtySDzOt/yW6FQYUoW8m0y/hGQw8de77gkv5GIVgyqqcEzogCPBRRXWH 3EXa8QxOIZejXHOFZeZeNJM2WTuG2aHuMJ8/niOVvkZAI/8F4S6q5d/VxnukzSxg8YR1 3bMLKtHbMZco0PTa7iDXBO7ZBewy9STpVVmDhjRF8WTMkZ4qcn6OCreKu5h8ULglbw9h IIM0AybXSb8ZRJlcd7OGvLWmakafb6bH2kKHY4ZU0y8DhMs7JyYyDkGPuGcix/SUUK97 /EVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy6ysaK9Z+OgV9BmIfVubRnILDc62GGGGPeN5U38ASURLz25oIN zCpt5x0ogWQMRC3pwQrcYZnlGsMU9EraKyB1NC8sNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHYxHlYu/b9jq1hZYwDJBTUYSSDdzBlVxG6txEHWSCkNIMRdBra+qgQir4lLTbNjKOfAbjN9wZa5rm8CXm04BI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:2527:b0:48d:969:af8b with SMTP id cl39-20020a056122252700b0048d0969af8bmr10536527vkb.1.1692956049376; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 02:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230824141447.155846739@linuxfoundation.org> <2023082512-amusement-luncheon-8d8d@gregkh> In-Reply-To: <2023082512-amusement-luncheon-8d8d@gregkh> From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 15:03:58 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/15] 6.1.48-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Christian Brauner , Jeff Layton , Chuck Lever , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, Sherry Yang , LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:35:46PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > + linux-nfs and more > > > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 19:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.48 release. > > > There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:14:28 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.48-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > Following test regression found on stable-rc 6.1. > > Rpi4 is using NFS mount rootfs and running LTP syscalls testing. > > chown02 tests creating testfile2 on NFS mounted and validating > > the functionality and found that it was a failure. > > > > This is already been reported by others on lore and fix patch merged > > into stable-rc linux-6.4.y [1] and [2]. > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > Odd, it's not a regression in this -rc cycle, so it was missed in the > previous ones somehow? I have re-tested with newers and older versions of the kernel and here I confirm that this is not a regression from this round of stable rc review. We have made a couple of changes to our infrastructure and are investigating the root cause of these two test cases failures. - Naresh