Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/59] 5.15.184-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>]

On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 19:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.184 release.
> There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 22 May 2025 12:57:37 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.184-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.15.184-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: ba6ee53cdfadb92bab1c005dfb67a4397a8a7219
* git describe: v5.15.183-60-gba6ee53cdfad
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.183-60-gba6ee53cdfad

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.182-55-g5aa355897d1b)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.182-55-g5aa355897d1b)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.182-55-g5aa355897d1b)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.182-55-g5aa355897d1b)

## Test result summary
total: 60301, pass: 46648, fail: 2204, skip: 11039, xfail: 410

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 101 total, 101 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 28 total, 28 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org