- * Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review
  2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-02-23 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli
  2023-02-23 20:42 ` Pavel Machek
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-02-23 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 2/23/23 06:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.170 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.170-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
- * Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review
  2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-02-23 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-02-23 20:42 ` Pavel Machek
  2023-02-23 23:36 ` Shuah Khan
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2023-02-23 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 661 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.170 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
- * Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review
  2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2023-02-23 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli
  2023-02-23 20:42 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2023-02-23 23:36 ` Shuah Khan
  2023-02-24  3:47 ` Slade Watkins
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-02-23 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 2/23/23 07:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.170 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.170-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
- * Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review
  2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-23 23:36 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-02-24  3:47 ` Slade Watkins
  2023-02-24  4:28 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Slade Watkins @ 2023-02-24  3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:16 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.170 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
5.10.170-rc2 compiled and booted on my x86_64 test system. No errors
or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net>
Thanks,
-- Slade
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
- * Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review
  2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-24  3:47 ` Slade Watkins
@ 2023-02-24  4:28 ` Guenter Roeck
  2023-02-24 11:17 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
  2023-02-24 11:43 ` Naresh Kamboju
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-02-24  4:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:16:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.170 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
Build results:
	total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 478 pass: 478 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
- * Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review
  2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-24  4:28 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-02-24 11:17 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
  2023-02-24 11:43 ` Naresh Kamboju
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2023-02-24 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:16:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.170 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230210):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2930
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2933
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
-- 
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
- * Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review
  2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-24 11:17 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2023-02-24 11:43 ` Naresh Kamboju
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-02-24 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 19:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.170 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.170-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.170-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: d4288b01f4e882fd7ba86ad1a570b7e420167eb0
* git describe: v5.10.169-27-gd4288b01f4e8
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.169-27-gd4288b01f4e8
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.169)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.169)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.169)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.169)
## Test result summary
total: 156882, pass: 130906, fail: 3641, skip: 22019, xfail: 316
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 149 total, 148 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 46 passed, 3 failed
* i386: 39 total, 37 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 25 passed, 7 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 11 passed, 5 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 40 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread