From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f54.google.com (mail-ej1-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A1715884D for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.54 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722409648; cv=none; b=qxddhQRH8o1YNmHQUT1dXeQdJ0DMJLoe2RmdjnaCqzhQnKOz3dp9GryqrOJJy3ycLgDN451gstP87cwq7kaAup3+lO8T+/yeLm4PRhCqb3PHGO8WGfkKn+Vq+DASvQDbWmr06Gj7YelPM1bk851GQuYjb7AQqb1QqzmTF5mrvAY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722409648; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YPyvNeoLsZV/8SRLmt6tzoyEftxMwY363Jj6/4Cvt9E=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=T+UlTTB5Umr+f90cyrhZVjUQHStHCq2bvHfzWlPDI7o4lEp7CS4IMCaXKuE5RtskmAua8dhA/V5OIbYk5H2iTnB87ST69AmQUZi2NM+QzToqzVt/QwBiDt+AJao6zsh1Gq8eY1i5qeMaCCg+SOhp6yE2J+rQV7wfnfvT3wELaQ8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=L7hr+4vy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.54 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="L7hr+4vy" Received: by mail-ej1-f54.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a7ab63a388bso416448766b.1 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:07:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1722409644; x=1723014444; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Tpy+nnibbUxT24aBwgVje1ug92d+vgtxsaPNSOQztMA=; b=L7hr+4vyE4pDdTw5FSkwIBBV3VaD+RbZhm/A/OcG+PoyMjEAUG/fbFIVihV5wOdZBN exO1yDCDdmxe6U4pWQHw1vbs3o5XFvRjV1Snwu1A5k1vfWj+9fpEnKzV1/3zkdEJ6oby 4NakS3CJUKA+4UPJhhkQ3Kaffg56LPiCKSebQjj5UJsFy3Ps5kgnCCQ82qejXaBue1Rr QolWRfwIDS/N1N4QgKkESllRbaN93yPoGiQxMC7V8VVuX1lk3gtc1qJaVzoPE2OaRO6Y bcrRPDhORZTSoFnZnsnyQvof/E+HSvMoBBMyB0aTSswDQgyoBWcoaNrKnjtKSzg66z70 2kmg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722409644; x=1723014444; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Tpy+nnibbUxT24aBwgVje1ug92d+vgtxsaPNSOQztMA=; b=tjt+YOjV5ObHBb/+nnrp53aYaRsriomYlpPNPwNu1G5Eob+WHfV7vt2xvSeL2j6Vhn 9B1tJJygB82Lfk3qXUJDxAd7GyMKzib/e+YXzKNNDML8X29j0KSrpDNG4kp7tRofuMUL p5lgyKfaYXDrzxHQsniqmwS61kqtMabWWpUqr0giuHY5gZKLV5pYvqoFcfrtAPrZpJz8 o4ub3jPd1WoP4G4439fk8a+AflhjXgu9KgIF8RGymBmLw7qgY01JOt0clFXfmEP14hE9 7E3LTSeuQQpgu5G7UhbOKLwjCmVQFyewuldtOg6RHP+413eYGnhmySDV3Ugk385gDo4a 1wXQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU7Pq1Epgj4usxuMYLbNWRn4NfSV9ozknK8QlpRYxpwXzwjJvJ5R2vw0iowjOIRoyXlnPphUFxdoFVX3IizMDOAlluWQBPGvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyhpgpap9MDidH3lb3Rn5Xg+pmdUFsXlFsR60Z048z73ydXqQQg P5xf8qXa5M56bdDvqqf6oHCZzjpplGRzbaQmGSR3WtDjyA9KSZnl6z2t0Npbe3B7+MhOYb3hUY3 yrOK/tXgum8SsuCDtz+pb4EdoheibFutcToz4vg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGZexRCl8N0H7iNZBGguludMOGdSOIQzKBFKm/K8c3Qp5kaS9pSyHKHgpZH79otFq1q9zgflZQKxZFwQLjP0Sw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:51cc:b0:5a1:de88:a5ef with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5b02317f4c0mr11460864a12.27.1722409643609; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240730151724.637682316@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20240730151724.637682316@linuxfoundation.org> From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:37:10 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/809] 6.10.3-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 21:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.3 release. > There are 809 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:14:54 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.3-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h As others reported, Following perf build warnings / errors noticed on stable-rc 6.10 for x86_64, arm64, arm and i386 with gcc-13 toolchain. Perf build regressions: ---- * arm, build - gcc-13-lkftconfig-perf * arm64, build - gcc-13-lkftconfig-perf * i386, build - gcc-13-lkftconfig-perf * x86_64, build - gcc-13-lkftconfig-perf Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Perf build logs: ------------- tests/pmu.c: In function 'test__name_len': tests/pmu.c:400:32: error: too few arguments to function 'pmu_name_len_no_suffix' 400 | TEST_ASSERT_VAL("cpu", pmu_name_len_no_suffix("cpu") == strlen("cpu")); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/tests.h:15:15: note: in definition of macro 'TEST_ASSERT_VAL' 15 | if (!(cond)) { \ | ^~~~ In file included from tools/perf/util/evsel.h:13, from tools/perf/util/evlist.h:14, from tests/pmu.c:2: tools/perf/util/pmus.h:8:5: note: declared here 8 | int pmu_name_len_no_suffix(const char *str, unsigned long *num); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/pmu.c:401:33: error: too few arguments to function 'pmu_name_len_no_suffix' 401 | TEST_ASSERT_VAL("i915", pmu_name_len_no_suffix("i915") == strlen("i915")); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/tests.h:15:15: note: in definition of macro 'TEST_ASSERT_VAL' 15 | if (!(cond)) { \ | ^~~~ tools/perf/util/pmus.h:8:5: note: declared here 8 | int pmu_name_len_no_suffix(const char *str, unsigned long *num); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/pmu.c:402:36: error: too few arguments to function 'pmu_name_len_no_suffix' 402 | TEST_ASSERT_VAL("cpum_cf", pmu_name_len_no_suffix("cpum_cf") == strlen("cpum_cf")); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/tests.h:15:15: note: in definition of macro 'TEST_ASSERT_VAL' 15 | if (!(cond)) { \ | ^~~~ tools/perf/util/pmus.h:8:5: note: declared here 8 | int pmu_name_len_no_suffix(const char *str, unsigned long *num); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/pmu.c:405:33: error: too few arguments to function 'pmu_name_len_no_suffix' 405 | pmu_name_len_no_suffix(uncore_chas[i]) == | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/tests.h:15:15: note: in definition of macro 'TEST_ASSERT_VAL' 15 | if (!(cond)) { \ | ^~~~ tools/perf/util/pmus.h:8:5: note: declared here 8 | int pmu_name_len_no_suffix(const char *str, unsigned long *num); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/pmu.c:410:33: error: too few arguments to function 'pmu_name_len_no_suffix' 410 | pmu_name_len_no_suffix(mrvl_ddrs[i]) == | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/tests.h:15:15: note: in definition of macro 'TEST_ASSERT_VAL' 15 | if (!(cond)) { \ | ^~~~ tools/perf/util/pmus.h:8:5: note: declared here 8 | int pmu_name_len_no_suffix(const char *str, unsigned long *num); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/pmu.c: In function 'test__name_cmp': tests/pmu.c:418:34: error: implicit declaration of function 'pmu_name_cmp'; did you mean 'test__name_cmp'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 418 | TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("cpu", pmu_name_cmp("cpu", "cpu"), 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ tests/tests.h:23:13: note: in definition of macro 'TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL' 23 | if (val != expected) { \ | ^~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org