From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lj1-f178.google.com (mail-lj1-f178.google.com [209.85.208.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89FA3BA27 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f178.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2b9d07a8d84so89350591fa.3 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 07:38:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692801490; x=1693406290; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=f1+ZllnE3NbofBa3yUXNVhhtAoB7pOoNIr9xPlAL2nQ=; b=F9Zz1Q+FMq1u5azSJ78JrOh/du6sYU23KN/am58NG3uX8jVDJvqJjviC+cKhkemZCO 1M83BojLnh/YGm/VTde+j+ZwzKgYbthMKufFSf8gbcMCYplecIOyKrII4aYMDwPMoY+4 r2SAukydHxtAnGhBSDAreBzt6odrH9XKeWLqna4we1ja3ij1+aoOtnQoEKiKopD5JOn+ ZIsU9kQgL7OaOfb2VEOWOonR+5BQvKnQYmjTQK8hUQnYJm6j4FoithtSzTOxrkgUrhP6 fEH+ZAWjTzXZgu9VANl5mE8Tg7i1AotWQvfCh0oD8QHTh3AJOdRU/bBifC3W7wvgAyVG rDVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692801490; x=1693406290; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=f1+ZllnE3NbofBa3yUXNVhhtAoB7pOoNIr9xPlAL2nQ=; b=LLxRfEHvjR5VyY4FIryGAjtLYOvurEo4H/D4X0ub0Hol33AGK2SEa7vM3Y+U+vDtqt VSIC4nFi/yTiHoMQWa3UTnxNsszFzO6tf8rfSAf0JgRxZkSpCZVjy2gvvEJ5xtu1EBsy yPwLwGQIQ9rD4rfCWoRAESuwmgOaxNAid4gbihIAZ/uFT5PczwVNB+3ZwYzEztMzh6+q cPhzmNs7w6eMdqYGmpqvW4ddc89ecfnV/SrrYyDdc6xo+GxKhCeZ/P3smdj1rc5CtsKt l1fo0JB5LwhsLFokPeGYAkfIIR54OK4BMFPpYLBkYfUZB8ef/6PMJKmBEiv+I+YSeZa6 wMMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzec2ysYwEC8FYsV8DsiFToGPbQBmyTjL95mpOobtZjugI2iRkc QB7ycc2oYZW2iDPNZun2SUbh8ygOMcrL4HGBwC0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHpt8TANhM2/9N/N8ppybLLJeWThUz4SEZ2Rh9Ro03P5XDBnf0PiL904TERN7Cywz4PqqO/arp4oPjTXdlgXGc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9649:0:b0:2bc:c28c:a2b8 with SMTP id z9-20020a2e9649000000b002bcc28ca2b8mr5711315ljh.27.1692801489970; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 07:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230821194122.695845670@linuxfoundation.org> <2023082303-musky-plastic-335f@gregkh> In-Reply-To: <2023082303-musky-plastic-335f@gregkh> From: Sudip Mukherjee Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 15:37:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/194] 6.1.47-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:54:45AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 09:39:39PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.47 release. > > > There are 194 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:40:45 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build test (gcc version 12.3.1 20230625): > > mips: 52 configs -> no failure > > arm: 100 configs -> no failure > > arm64: 3 configs -> no failure > > x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure > > alpha allmodconfig -> no failure > > csky allmodconfig -> no failure > > powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure > > riscv allmodconfig -> no failure > > s390 allmodconfig -> no failure > > xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure > > > > Boot test: > > x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. Warning on boot, already reported by others. > > x86_64: Booted on qemu. Warning on boot, already reported by others. [1] > > arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] > > mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] > > > > [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4765 > > [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4773 > > [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4772 > > > > Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee > > > > -- > > Regards > > Sudip > > One question about the warning on boot, all still works afterward, > right? Or does the system not work? I did not notice any problem in testing after boot. Only the warning. -- Regards Sudip