From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Region driver
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 09:41:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hkP1iuBxCPTK_FeQ=+afmVOLAAfE6t0z2u2OGH+Crmag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220520172325.000043d8@huawei.com>
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 9:23 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 11:37:05 -0700
> Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Spring cleaning is here and we're starting fresh so I won't be referencing
> > previous postings and I've removed revision history from commit messages.
> >
> > This patch series introduces the CXL region driver as well as associated APIs in
> > CXL core to create and configure regions. Regions are defined by the CXL 2.0
> > specification [1], a summary follows.
> >
> > A region surfaces a swath of RAM (persistent or volatile) that appears as normal
> > memory to the operating system. The memory, unless programmed by BIOS, or a
> > previous Operating System, is inaccessible until the CXL driver creates a region
> > for it.A region may be strided (interleave granularity) across multiple devices
> > (interleave ways). The interleaving may traverse multiple levels of the CXL
> > hierarchy.
> >
> > +-------------------------+ +-------------------------+
> > | | | |
> > | CXL 2.0 Host Bridge | | CXL 2.0 Host Bridge |
> > | | | |
> > | +------+ +------+ | | +------+ +------+ |
> > | | RP | | RP | | | | RP | | RP | |
> > +--+------+-----+------+--+ +--+------+-----+------+--+
> > | | | \--
> > | | | +-------+-\--+------+
> > +------+ +-------+ +-------+ | |USP | |
> > |Type 3| |Type 3 | |Type 3 | | +----+ |
> > |Device| |Device | |Device | | CXL Switch |
> > +------+ +-------+ +-------+ | +----+ +----+ |
> > | |DSP | |DSP | |
> > +-+-|--+-----+-|--+-+
> > | |
> > +------+ +-------+
> > |Type 3| |Type 3 |
> > |Device| |Device |
> > +------+ +-------+
> >
> > Region verification and programming state are owned by the cxl_region driver
> > (implemented in the cxl_region module). Much of the region driver is an
> > implementation of algorithms described in the CXL Type 3 Memory Device Software
> > Guide [2].
> >
> > The region driver is responsible for configuring regions found on persistent
> > capacities in the Label Storage Area (LSA), it will also enumerate regions
> > configured by BIOS, usually volatile capacities, and will allow for dynamic
> > region creation (which can then be stored in the LSA). Only dynamically created
> > regions are implemented thus far.
> >
> > Dan has previously stated that he doesn't want to merge ABI until the whole
> > series is posted and reviewed, to make sure we have no gaps. As such, the goal
> > of posting this series is *not* to discuss the ABI specifically, feedback is of
> > course welcome. In other wordsIt has been discussed previously. The goal is to find
> > architectural flaws in the implementation of the ABI that may pose problematic
> > for cases we haven't yet conceived.
> >
> > Since region creation is done via sysfs, it is left to userspace to prevent
> > racing for resource usage. Here is an overview for creating a x1 256M
> > dynamically created region programming to be used by userspace clients. In this
> > example, the following topology is used (cropped for brevity):
> > /sys/bus/cxl/devices/
> > ├── decoder0.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/decoder0.0
> > ├── decoder0.1 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/decoder0.1
> > ├── decoder1.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/port1/decoder1.0
> > ├── decoder2.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/port2/decoder2.0
> > ├── decoder3.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/port1/endpoint3/decoder3.0
> > ├── decoder4.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/port2/endpoint4/decoder4.0
> > ├── decoder5.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/port1/endpoint5/decoder5.0
> > ├── decoder6.0 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/port2/endpoint6/decoder6.0
> > ├── endpoint3 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/port1/endpoint3
> > ├── endpoint4 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/port2/endpoint4
> > ├── endpoint5 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/port1/endpoint5
> > ├── endpoint6 -> ../../../devices/platform/ACPI0017:00/root0/port2/endpoint6
> > ...
> >
> > 1. Select a Root Decoder whose interleave spans the desired interleave config
> > - devices, IG, IW, Large enough address space.
> > - ie. pick decoder0.0
> > 2. Program the decoders for the endpoints comprising the interleave set.
> > - ie. echo $((256 << 20)) > /sys/bus/cxl/devices/decoder3.0
> > 3. Create a region
> > - ie. echo $(cat create_pmem_region) >| create_pmem_region
> > 4. Configure a region
> > - ie. echo 256 >| interleave_granularity
> > echo 1 >| interleave_ways
> > echo $((256 << 20)) >| size
> > echo decoder3.0 >| target0
> > 5. Bind the region driver to the region
> > - ie. echo region0 > /sys/bus/cxl/drivers/cxl_region/bind
> >
> Hi Ben,
>
> I finally got around to actually trying this out on top of Dan's recent fix set
> (I rebased it from the cxl/preview branch on kernel.org).
>
> I'm not having much luck actually bring up a region.
>
> The patch set refers to configuring the end point decoders, but all their
> sysfs attributes are read only. Am I missing a dependency somewhere or
> is the intent that this series is part of the solution only?
>
> I'm confused!
There's a new series that's being reviewed internally before going to the list:
https://gitlab.com/bwidawsk/linux/-/tree/cxl_region-redux3
Given the proximity to the merge window opening and the need to get
the "mem_enabled" series staged, I asked Ben to hold it back from the
list for now.
There are some changes I am folding into it, but I hope to send it out
in the next few days after "mem_enabled" is finalized.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-13 18:37 [RFC PATCH 00/15] Region driver Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] cxl/core: Use is_endpoint_decoder Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 21:22 ` Dan Williams
[not found] ` <CGME20220415205052uscas1p209e03abf95b9c80b2ba1f287c82dfd80@uscas1p2.samsung.com>
2022-04-15 20:50 ` Adam Manzanares
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] cxl/core/hdm: Bail on endpoint init fail Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 21:31 ` Dan Williams
[not found] ` <CGME20220418163713uscas1p17b3b1b45c7d27e54e3ecb62eb8af2469@uscas1p1.samsung.com>
2022-04-18 16:37 ` Adam Manzanares
2022-05-12 15:50 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-05-12 17:27 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-13 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-05-13 15:03 ` Dan Williams
2022-05-13 15:12 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-13 19:14 ` Dan Williams
2022-05-13 19:31 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-19 5:09 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] Revert "cxl/core: Convert decoder range to resource" Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 21:43 ` Dan Williams
2022-05-12 16:09 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] cxl/core: Create distinct decoder structs Ben Widawsky
2022-04-15 1:45 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-18 20:43 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] cxl/acpi: Reserve CXL resources from request_free_mem_region Ben Widawsky
2022-04-18 16:42 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-19 16:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-19 21:50 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-19 21:59 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-19 23:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-20 0:47 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-20 14:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-20 15:32 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] cxl/acpi: Manage root decoder's address space Ben Widawsky
2022-04-18 22:15 ` Dan Williams
2022-05-12 19:18 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] cxl/port: Surface ram and pmem resources Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] cxl/core/hdm: Allocate resources from the media Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] cxl/core/port: Add attrs for size and volatility Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] cxl/core: Extract IW/IG decoding Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] cxl/acpi: Use common " Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] cxl/region: Add region creation ABI Ben Widawsky
2022-05-04 22:56 ` Verma, Vishal L
2022-05-05 5:17 ` Dan Williams
2022-05-12 15:54 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] cxl/core/port: Add attrs for root ways & granularity Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] cxl/region: Introduce configuration Ben Widawsky
2022-04-13 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] cxl/region: Introduce a cxl_region driver Ben Widawsky
2022-05-20 16:23 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] Region driver Jonathan Cameron
2022-05-20 16:41 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2022-05-31 12:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-23 5:40 ` Dan Williams
2022-06-23 15:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-23 17:33 ` Dan Williams
2022-06-23 23:44 ` Dan Williams
2022-06-24 9:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPcyv4hkP1iuBxCPTK_FeQ=+afmVOLAAfE6t0z2u2OGH+Crmag@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).