* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-02-23 21:22 ` Justin Forbes
2023-02-23 22:07 ` Florian Fainelli
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2023-02-23 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:16:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.14-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc2 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-23 21:22 ` Justin Forbes
@ 2023-02-23 22:07 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-02-23 22:11 ` Conor Dooley
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-02-23 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 2/23/23 06:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.14-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-23 21:22 ` Justin Forbes
2023-02-23 22:07 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-02-23 22:11 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-23 23:32 ` Shuah Khan
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-02-23 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 861 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:16:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.14-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Ditto here, looks grand on our RISC-V stuff.
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Cheers,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-23 22:11 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2023-02-23 23:32 ` Shuah Khan
2023-02-24 3:42 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-02-23 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 2/23/23 07:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.14-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-23 23:32 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-02-24 3:42 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-02-24 4:29 ` Guenter Roeck
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-02-24 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:16:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-24 3:42 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2023-02-24 4:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-24 8:54 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-02-24 4:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:16:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 503 pass: 503 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-24 4:29 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-02-24 8:54 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-02-24 11:19 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-02-24 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 19:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.14-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.14-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 342b7f3b3ae56d997a28ceec3321ebca5b73c30b
* git describe: v6.1.13-48-g342b7f3b3ae5
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.13-48-g342b7f3b3ae5
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.13)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.13)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.13)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.13)
## Test result summary
total: 163767, pass: 144832, fail: 4537, skip: 14355, xfail: 43
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 149 total, 146 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 51 total, 48 passed, 3 failed
* i386: 39 total, 36 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 30 total, 28 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 38 total, 32 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 13 passed, 3 failed
* s390: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 44 total, 42 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-24 8:54 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-02-24 11:19 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2023-02-24 17:55 ` Slade Watkins
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2023-02-24 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:16:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230210):
mips: 52 configs -> no failure
arm: 100 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2932
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2934
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2935
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-24 11:19 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2023-02-24 17:55 ` Slade Watkins
2023-02-24 17:58 ` Ron Economos
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Slade Watkins @ 2023-02-24 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:16 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
6.1.14-rc2 compiled and booted on my x86_64 test system. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net>
Thanks,
-- Slade
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-24 17:55 ` Slade Watkins
@ 2023-02-24 17:58 ` Ron Economos
2023-02-24 19:05 ` Allen Pais
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2023-02-24 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 2/23/23 6:16 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.14-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-24 17:58 ` Ron Economos
@ 2023-02-24 19:05 ` Allen Pais
2023-02-25 2:18 ` Kelsey Steele
2023-02-25 5:14 ` Rudi Heitbaum
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Allen Pais @ 2023-02-24 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.14-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-24 19:05 ` Allen Pais
@ 2023-02-25 2:18 ` Kelsey Steele
2023-02-25 5:14 ` Rudi Heitbaum
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2023-02-25 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:16:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No regressions found on WSL x86_64 or WSL arm64
Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.
Thank you.
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 6.1 00/47] 6.1.14-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-25 2:18 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2023-02-25 5:14 ` Rudi Heitbaum
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rudi Heitbaum @ 2023-02-25 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:16:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.14 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
6.1.14-rc2 tested.
Run tested on:
- Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6)
- Intel Alder Lake x86_64 (nuc12 i7-1260P)
In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread