From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (mail-wm1-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEC7B23D4 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id r9-20020a1c4409000000b003d02dd48c45so3356233wma.0 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:16:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hhE3haZb45CNFULsHmxwy6vNCZW7lpy6GOVrdTfivPU=; b=a9W2owUCiWIJEl1zC8SQpHH6xMsKDPL6Zhomc9tVZyDc1RJPSLlEnSCj5e9zHhgxl+ 64x8vTJM9xRuDe9jbUmdmhR+1XeUwkJZMTgRt3PwC5lIv1AZqV0h7iGR9rzmstycsIXa B3aZZhkeK0K4qANLbOIoibhUS/WoOQLdXAv0nDHgkqrpstdpy9pkcG3zUj4NSQ41y/S2 Y1HJ/+0Y1UJfp0wxxYcS9FQBxcIWu+1WdEDiDU3w9+AKZvUAqFrUZqaZjHqolTsrrlo2 HSu0Lc54FOGorUS2iIpVEJbppZBeHxgZQKxqyjAuH/WbFwPdNpIDC1cnsNwIi4fWXXwY vhww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=hhE3haZb45CNFULsHmxwy6vNCZW7lpy6GOVrdTfivPU=; b=GJ1DrwORoG56zxpfxeeOBFvW9WZuzTvq7AUSSRUS2Cg3FkJaNxGFE0FgV5l3g+jieP 962xyE0rT9z0dEknJW5COXceXzKEyOQE66kKJwdFrC1+zFVmo/GBgF3uUkDE3JLNb+hL Eg9sL2AHWD+Vyy1vAs+yGgb0ul5uQmgJFYydkjLAUSmR2J2JRw/rNIeDmwdu3zFimQ7t iEc3X0R3Sn8NTrnUTKkKDQWaVIfzdjpbgH7JSTS3z6zUrke4cwGCIw/94pBwhgDO5fv/ dfcmHelFaqUNHwpIRGiot1GAoQo7Ypipr376yRrs0EkHnkB1rjcmHgFfD7nILt0RPgdH fF5g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkIpABFFLDcwKkecffl8cSfpHjFXVDWBu51MGOpQGuy6319LZ8G 9h5X8S0wN3cJFnN1iwzcr6z9zJVCVJY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4XBviurARzZqb6Yq7Pcs2grnbACeQWURwUcnvS+y6QDCrwTpM00ImOHe4vAL6jd5TymyL0pg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4894:b0:3b4:91f1:da83 with SMTP id j20-20020a05600c489400b003b491f1da83mr12754098wmp.127.1669288603060; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:16:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w16-20020a5d5450000000b00241db7deb57sm1057267wrv.114.2022.11.24.03.16.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:16:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:16:40 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/314] 6.0.10-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20221123084625.457073469@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221123084625.457073469@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:47:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.10 release. > There are 314 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:45:20 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20221016): mips: 52 configs -> 1 failure arm: 100 configs -> 2 failures arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> 1 failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Note: 1. As reported by others arm mips and powerpc allmodconfig fails with: drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c:1299:13: error: 'rtc_wake_setup' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 1299 | static void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2. arm imxrt_defconfig fails with: In file included from ./include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:5, from security/device_cgroup.c:8: ./include/linux/bpf.h:2310:20: error: static declaration of 'bpf_prog_inc_misses_counter' follows non-static declaration 2310 | static inline void bpf_prog_inc_misses_counter(struct bpf_prog *prog) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/bpf.h:1970:14: note: previous declaration of 'bpf_prog_inc_misses_counter' with type 'void(struct bpf_prog *)' 1970 | void notrace bpf_prog_inc_misses_counter(struct bpf_prog *prog); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Caused by a1ba348f5325 ("bpf: Prevent bpf program recursion for raw tracepoint probes"). Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2210 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2214 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2216 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip