From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EFE37E for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:55:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=w6RhqyoqH6BSTeN6EShgE/XnFp7pNDPLZa4RD6/f7dw=; b=GJMb3dG/Q8z7tbsQvPKgCaHpj+ 3/Wa5M1XSAsoxnEI74GDYyeJM0Qtv3DE/395kqzsylb/BtZqEHry6XqzKn91elwR4KAFzalLHFuf9 8ioeEHXrYN4VSgxBE1W5pXIkz1iRIShRshEfmGhgOAEwHseBGa2Dd0SVou0HS1db9qnULsoTSTTDd nGvrPeVJyP7th+PzF2xqeassDFy58GkCl02eLuo4Gw1aDY81MTmalGUhzPnL4Xi3KhAsAwQ+Y/PbB eHrWq+wyP7LwMy4s4KxBK0WlPFzEgGD5KtYRNnxXRuRtJ818fOz+7ynMDcJHvCOTlYwa80nIm1Y/M uG+cwkgg==; Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oQkIU-00G5bF-Hj; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:55:30 +0000 Received: by worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4AABF980403; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:55:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:55:29 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Tony Luck Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Add new Raptor Lake CPU model number Message-ID: References: <20220823174819.223941-1-tony.luck@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220823174819.223941-1-tony.luck@intel.com> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:48:19AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote: > Note1: Model 0xB7 already claimed the "no suffix" #define for a regular > client part, so add (yet another) suffix "S" to distinguish this new > part from the earlier one. > > Note2: the RAPTORLAKE* and ALDERLAKE* processors are very similar from a > software enabling point of view. There are no known features that have > model-specific enabling and also differ between the two. In other words, > every single place that list *one* or more RAPTORLAKE* or ALDERLAKE* > processors should list all of them. Note3: Except when they should not: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yv9Kw21Wl/f6KJTk@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net/?q=Alder+Lake+N