From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.denx.de (mx.denx.de [89.58.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8688C46434 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.32.78 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740216091; cv=none; b=HA2REsvRa9+HoDI7zR3sVCPOXv872AjU8TNzJm2RYUP3wolC8iCUiWq6d0xyIEqnSQH9gOhI/7bbrRy1q2P/5ZDKapesOIj2Me4E6AiYt132BkmMYBtjBDaszyxCSE+N2bgCDYVuCvsI1hg0sbMAMDUysSg9irn8k+gz6s5a4IE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740216091; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qlH9IIzw3P8bG0Y+0Ym3bfM7heifGiP46tWEKwRCeDQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JAEp+seQ0Z0Lo4ws3n3B8ol3x05RONPW3A3q6MmCS02B+OlQdMP2HxJCV9hkU6O0+rk8xdXIvJvJmpgpN6l6/gVLtHzTB3qfnSWf7vCOdYWpzu/OgMefhws+SRg9wmFVJ/+Hv3NFlVZNNHdXqf9Bw9aX2wDpnEX3w22Pkeo6vj4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.b=QC12IWSl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.32.78 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.b="QC12IWSl" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 5553510382D37; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:21:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=mx-20241105; t=1740216086; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UoUQ6xgBvQ4zPUsBkMw3Rw1y1WZnoFmf4uRXsdLpC7E=; b=QC12IWSl8i4pbwqD59DEIsZDB0V9HjZHCk0b5/XMoZw7JGGwYBCtriZD6NPQhyCp9rta6f i2m8dd9dbY/46Pz/fheaQcDBDaS0EUO2SmYsDXhaDqFrJpk8ZA+GqwoOCPSg5Yge42/8Up uyNJGdWxzo1xzuWpuhgxQ7nAXdKmuNziDFGxB+/ENd+h25bx5x/nP0d0KESaCGUXRV0pj+ xYrbEe2V4NZ8rg4s1d2qcPTEPOoaDD9nrkAVVUOWQvM5X5dOdnTmSr/s/a6y57Ic5+R/ow QIEg6AWAVW6bkicuxEurwlQ3PojwqEwuZw+fsDjYfMxw6um6QYZ6cPIO3wpOaw== Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:21:18 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Florian Fainelli , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/569] 6.1.129-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20250220104545.805660879@linuxfoundation.org> <80ab673f-aa94-43e2-899a-0c5a22f3f1e0@gmail.com> <2025022221-revert-hubcap-f519@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WnBP1FLzBJ0x5Zfu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2025022221-revert-hubcap-f519@gregkh> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 --WnBP1FLzBJ0x5Zfu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat 2025-02-22 07:28:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:45:15AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > > On 2/20/2025 2:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.129 release. > > > There are 569 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, plea= se > > > let me know. > > >=20 > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:44:04 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > >=20 > > And yet there was a v6.1.29 tag created already? >=20 > Sometimes I'm faster, which is usually the case for -rc2 and later, I go > off of the -rc1 date if the people that had problems with -rc1 have > reported that the newer -rc fixes their reported issues. Well, quoting time down to second then doing something completely different is quite confusing. Please fix your scripts. Best regards, Pavel --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --WnBP1FLzBJ0x5Zfu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCZ7mXDgAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8llnAJ9sSrPxmuiGUCG4udfEAn54Ow/FPQCfdSghReCJWRAH2GRnAj+6HrgvEuk= =98kv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WnBP1FLzBJ0x5Zfu--