From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com (mail-wm1-f41.google.com [209.85.128.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2537B for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id j19-20020a05600c1c1300b003e9b564fae9so7909155wms.2 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 04:47:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678538846; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JG+XDDsuS0ZSnVTC9Y0KL7M1HHk6RFW1/rF+Zc3EvoU=; b=Lk25gEEq+pGPmf7NgSfolMBtNmooCjRuWdWhl8XJOARRdE2hr/HJFxxnYIB4INAFJm +ZJfXopXL6VX21ZjBVvPOU1vJqQbpP6BNw98OSrnx5BKdsdCWMaWVaUaiSeiEEwjpEmC AIRPFl8MP8xgm/fCnZeowKYtzfahh8hLbi1WFRHzcxxBWFk3MvqViNhjVO5wi6XL32M9 ZezRt+arpjqEKvnw7JKOOWFGmXBAQxkolWn7PwfdYQg2uMLlmPnFivWHdaTUUcEuGM68 IJbOqED71Gt+wMZ5gS2n+GtYJ0k1N7B4eb+4Oqe4ePvIJnyTFB/o+dG9+i9ZYuOW6NNO iuoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678538846; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=JG+XDDsuS0ZSnVTC9Y0KL7M1HHk6RFW1/rF+Zc3EvoU=; b=oaWhO8ARHHQvWQPAMxSucY1fiWvfRzJSSsrqD2y36B2HhLeQSpS0ER1uRieh6Phi/c qftMsO1WOGnb961CeFAsDdxHfK9tg5mJMyl4vurfXA897wXt1dk5n0yBG3n2kgiCpF2P 99/iYuP5COVoOGnyxj6HExeC96MyMiadW7ZJPdmsj1NN4KFY1M0h+UmZAGw3rxjrKSGV 6CDL+9yZpP6HAEnOiS6Ohu1JgUFI01ffGN1+O02VTWX7iPIXCuTTWJZBvfs41uF5UYld yDU+DhXl5b+1y1tttVYNTMGDgEOKr8gXiFb4cEgEVV85fhnYSg6Ct857O8+XlCVDHXYb 2niw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWDmamA9FzitGIMbbqhYk45FJCqDEViuFHO+UmS5fwAKptviy3z 7knvt1DHxjGLgMwxWaFtg4s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9JSjHy6wHUEUe39Ir6qYIqFyQG3TiAh/Chj112lk3wx1xNetuk+R2dS8eYeGVyrF6BUVSkPA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:35c4:b0:3df:9858:c039 with SMTP id r4-20020a05600c35c400b003df9858c039mr3596885wmq.14.1678538846080; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 04:47:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d12-20020a05600c3acc00b003e2052bad94sm2711439wms.33.2023.03.11.04.47.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 Mar 2023 04:47:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:47:24 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/136] 5.15.100-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230310133706.811226272@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230310133706.811226272@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:42:02PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.100 release. > There are 136 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:36:38 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230210): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Failed to boot on my test laptop. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] Note: Failed to boot on my test laptop, just black screen. Bisect pointed to 4eb6789f9177 ("drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC") which was added in v5.15.99. I failed to test v5.15.99 due to lack of time. :( [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3075 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3084 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip