Archive-only list for patches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: pmladek@suse.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, ndesaulniers@google.com,
	trix@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: test_scanf: Add explicit type cast to result initialization in test_number_prefix()
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 07:25:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMx9nDQVaoRwN5oK@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230803-test_scanf-wconstant-conversion-v1-1-74da994dedbc@kernel.org>

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 11:14:42AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> A recent change in clang allows it to consider more expressions as
> compile time constants, which causes it to point out an implicit
> conversion in the scanf tests:
> 
>   lib/test_scanf.c:661:2: warning: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'unsigned char' changes value from -168 to 88 [-Wconstant-conversion]
>     661 |         test_number_prefix(unsigned char,       "0xA7", "%2hhx%hhx", 0, 0xa7, 2, check_uchar);
>         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   lib/test_scanf.c:609:29: note: expanded from macro 'test_number_prefix'
>     609 |         T result[2] = {~expect[0], ~expect[1]};                                 \
>         |                       ~            ^~~~~~~~~~
>   1 warning generated.
> 
> The result of the bitwise negation is the type of the operand after
> going through the integer promotion rules, so this truncation is
> expected but harmless, as the initial values in the result array get
> overwritten by _test() anyways. Add an explicit cast to the expected
> type in test_number_prefix() to silence the warning. There is no
> functional change, as all the tests still pass with GCC 13.1.0 and clang
> 18.0.0.

>  do {										\
>  	const T expect[2] = { expect0, expect1 };				\
> -	T result[2] = {~expect[0], ~expect[1]};					\
> +	T result[2] = {(T)~expect[0], (T)~expect[1]};				\

Can we add spaces as above, while at it?

	T result[2] = { (T)~expect[0], (T)~expect[1] };				\

>  	_test(fn, &expect, str, scan_fmt, n_args, &result[0], &result[1]);	\
>  } while (0)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-04  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-03 18:14 [PATCH] lib: test_scanf: Add explicit type cast to result initialization in test_number_prefix() Nathan Chancellor
2023-08-04  4:25 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-08-04 14:48   ` Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZMx9nDQVaoRwN5oK@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox