From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/15] 6.1.48-rc1 review
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:26:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOhz4/8Q8XjIqpCy@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230824141447.155846739@linuxfoundation.org>
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 04:14:56PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.48 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:14:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.3.1 20230625):
mips: 52 configs -> no failure
arm: 100 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. Warning on boot.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. Warning on boot. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4787
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4796
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4795
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
[ 0.154501] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.154505] missing return thunk: __alt_instructions_end+0x21b2/0x21d0-srso_untrain_ret+0x0/0x2: e9 17 81 f8 fe
[ 0.154517] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:572 apply_returns+0x1cb/0x200
[ 0.154524] Modules linked in:
[ 0.154526] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.1.48-rc1-c079d0dd788a+ #1
[ 0.154529] Hardware name: LENOVO 4287CTO/4287CTO, BIOS 8DET68WW (1.38 ) 04/11/2013
[ 0.154531] RIP: 0010:apply_returns+0x1cb/0x200
[ 0.154534] Code: 5b 01 00 0f 85 0b ff ff ff 49 89 e8 b9 05 00 00 00 4c 89 f2 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 38 16 4f b8 c6 05 f5 d1 5b 01 01 e8 85 8e 05 00 <0f> 0b e9 e3 fe ff ff c7 84 24 81 00 00 00 cc cc cc cc 42 c7 44 38
[ 0.154536] RSP: 0000:ffffffffb8803e30 EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 0.154539] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffb906d7b4 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 0.154541] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000004ffb RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[ 0.154542] RBP: ffffffffb9079962 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffefff
[ 0.154544] R10: ffffffffb8803cc0 R11: ffffffffb88cc1e8 R12: ffffffffb906d7d4
[ 0.154545] R13: cccccccccccccccc R14: ffffffffb8001a7e R15: 0000000000000004
[ 0.154547] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff936dd6200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 0.154549] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 0.154551] CR2: ffff936dde5ff000 CR3: 000000013b40a001 CR4: 00000000000606f0
[ 0.154553] Call Trace:
[ 0.154556] <TASK>
[ 0.154559] ? __warn+0x79/0xc0
[ 0.154565] ? apply_returns+0x1cb/0x200
[ 0.154567] ? report_bug+0xee/0x170
[ 0.154572] ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20
[ 0.154578] ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70
[ 0.154581] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
[ 0.154583] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
[ 0.154586] ? retbleed_return_thunk+0x7e/0x7e
[ 0.154591] ? apply_returns+0x1cb/0x200
[ 0.154594] ? apply_retpolines+0x1f5/0x2c0
[ 0.154598] alternative_instructions+0x4d/0xfc
[ 0.154604] arch_cpu_finalize_init+0x28/0x47
[ 0.154607] start_kernel+0x66c/0x70e
[ 0.154612] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xce/0xdb
[ 0.154618] </TASK>
[ 0.154619] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
--
Regards
Sudip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-24 14:14 [PATCH 6.1 00/15] 6.1.48-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:14 ` [PATCH 6.1 01/15] x86/cpu: Fix __x86_return_thunk symbol type Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:14 ` [PATCH 6.1 02/15] x86/cpu: Fix up srso_safe_ret() and __x86_return_thunk() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:14 ` [PATCH 6.1 03/15] x86/alternative: Make custom return thunk unconditional Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 04/15] x86/cpu: Clean up SRSO return thunk mess Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 05/15] x86/cpu: Rename original retbleed methods Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 06/15] x86/cpu: Rename srso_(.*)_alias to srso_alias_\1 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 07/15] x86/cpu: Cleanup the untrain mess Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 08/15] x86/srso: Explain the untraining sequences a bit more Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 09/15] x86/static_call: Fix __static_call_fixup() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 10/15] x86/retpoline: Dont clobber RFLAGS during srso_safe_ret() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 11/15] x86/CPU/AMD: Fix the DIV(0) initial fix attempt Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 12/15] x86/srso: Disable the mitigation on unaffected configurations Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 13/15] x86/retpoline,kprobes: Fix position of thunk sections with CONFIG_LTO_CLANG Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 14/15] objtool/x86: Fixup frame-pointer vs rethunk Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 14:15 ` [PATCH 6.1 15/15] x86/srso: Correct the mitigation status when SMT is disabled Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 21:31 ` [PATCH 6.1 00/15] 6.1.48-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
2023-08-25 3:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-08-25 1:30 ` SeongJae Park
2023-08-25 2:40 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-08-25 7:05 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-08-25 7:15 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-08-25 7:45 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-25 8:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-25 8:48 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-08-25 16:29 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-08-25 9:33 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-08-25 9:26 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) [this message]
2023-08-26 8:45 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2023-08-25 9:40 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-08-25 10:15 ` Jon Hunter
2023-08-25 12:16 ` Conor Dooley
2023-08-25 12:33 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
2023-08-25 15:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-08-25 18:12 ` Shuah Khan
2023-08-26 1:23 ` Bagas Sanjaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZOhz4/8Q8XjIqpCy@debian \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).