From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0185C3B2BE;
	Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:55:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 209A121E17;
	Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:55:53 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1;
	t=1695228953; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
	 mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=YRuJsY73C8doQ4cNf1LjL+UhEmqmPUGsnMHO5Imx8so=;
	b=dKI2cRhasOtnaSBCgHjLyUopF0KNuF+cPl+ufz4nGgCod/Sl8Ub2LjKkQ0FAvxJdjnvDmg
	loN3fdV7iY3W0HfKtQ7/3pa0ZqYapkZuE1Akp8EzbDWK39Heez0rwJ3Xg9iHYJwzuTCz4H
	64/c3qT/xH5HCj7WJ3OK6gSwbOE1Hek=
Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8EDA1333E;
	Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:55:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65])
	by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA
	id KbyzNBgkC2V7dQAAMHmgww
	(envelope-from <mhocko@suse.com>); Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:55:52 +0000
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 18:55:52 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
	mathieu.tortuyaux@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Re: [PATCH 6.1 033/219] memcg: drop
 kmem.limit_in_bytes
Message-ID: <ZQskGGAwlsr1YxAp@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20230917191040.964416434@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20230917191042.204185566@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20230920081101.GA12096@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
 <ZQqwzK/fDm+GLiKM@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <101987a1-b1ab-429d-af03-b6bdf6216474@linux.microsoft.com>
 <ZQrSXh+riB7NnZuE@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <4eb47d6a-b127-4aad-af30-896c3b9505b4@linux.microsoft.com>
 <ZQr3+YfcBM2Er6F7@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CALvZod7E_Jm9y+40OKtLs5EFA0ptKGjoe2BU58SY29pUiPc93g@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <patches.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:patches+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:patches+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALvZod7E_Jm9y+40OKtLs5EFA0ptKGjoe2BU58SY29pUiPc93g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed 20-09-23 08:32:42, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> Also I don't think reverting 58056f77502f would give any benefit.

Not reverting 58056f77502f would re-introduce the regression in some
non-patched versions of Docker runtimes which cannot handle ENOTSUPP.
So I think we need to revert both or none of them. I would prefer the
later (option 1) as the fix is trivial but I do understand headache
of chasing all those outdated deployments or vendor code forks.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs