From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E0F118AED for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 910C61C006D; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:18:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:18:19 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Pavel Machek Cc: wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se, yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, geert+renesas@glider.be, biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: renesas_sdhi problems in 5.10-stable was Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/226] 5.10.198-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20231009130126.697995596@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="A9Lr04onjTJhAtpN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --A9Lr04onjTJhAtpN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.198 release. > > > There are 226 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, plea= se > > > let me know. > > >=20 > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:00:55 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > >=20 > > 4.14, 4.19 and 6.1 tests ok, 5.10 seems to have problems: >=20 > Guessing from stack traces, these may be relevant: So bisection reveals these are relevant: |e10d3d256 b161d8 o: 5.10| mmc: renesas_sdhi: probe into TMIO after SCC= parameters have been setup Ok |493b70c48 d14ac6 o: 5.10| mmc: renesas_sdhi: populate SCC pointer at the= proper place Testing now: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/-/pipeline= s/1031822035 |c508545f4 0d856c o: 5.10| mmc: tmio: support custom irq masks |8df1f0639 74f45d o: 5.10| mmc: renesas_sdhi: register irqs before registe= ring controller Fail: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/-/pipelines/10317= 86077 I should be able to point specific commit with two more tests. Best regards, Pavel --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --A9Lr04onjTJhAtpN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCZSUy+wAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8l+cAKC5myuJkrwEyf9tCv+eqSAzp44+BACgpL5hAh7OSoSbpIj6nYPrbvMxOZA= =ZKvd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --A9Lr04onjTJhAtpN--