From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com (mail-wr1-f48.google.com [209.85.221.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F3BF2F5B for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 08:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="itegzj+p" Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-32d8c2c6dfdso2700957f8f.1 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698137341; x=1698742141; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Mo7Xx0J6SUzUUTIhfv7Y9XKD/ghnjNlWvwQxCcFYVUc=; b=itegzj+p+MNdrzy/qupquVpEJJ2cAlzLsDOXrt80m/grPPCoUp6yKBPac7AjqF1XUU tniVIgBG9sPOwRQGna2Twe/Wz7dAiCfYyue4CgQUIIWe9sGBU9svBcQM5yBjx8jwLtI1 Slbzw1J1kWWKFR/ynzJMcBnCuvbgE3KRV2WZ6eLS8VK0Vs/dhsDR4ZiFGiUAZjhkIeU6 BUc8h3Nu/KemOaMCNmK04Ncs7Nzj4AvLPLMLYKO2vkmFnTt8dOXRfiQd9eG35ow1BU2A fch/m+S3Dr5LWMsf63InhSssdaIGWw/hrpwCngePmvtCACm3w6wiXdcZlLn+fQVlz5iL 1ncA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698137341; x=1698742141; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Mo7Xx0J6SUzUUTIhfv7Y9XKD/ghnjNlWvwQxCcFYVUc=; b=T588gvVHVupZa0zFamdKGfLKwmxQLNw0HmeGn1yCDMM3zxf+Am1WkwPwXafvgh4Foo XxcAkm5ABzFnUs3q9xEScHr6fEYF5sFOqfXMIEtdN1vz4RoHO+eC6HUpy+2nwiBxyMwG 1GPh3yu13dNA5JBQivoNVyeT9ip++rAw9lUf0GsOE6uKGx7tR8EuCDw3/JBiekHnxuyR PYuczDMXygry4LLXzVqxHgO4Su//7mBgxOtSq3SwslRMDo0gGbFLaBM3WEvcyGrwTlzP RcBavSnwg/y79TP9Qd5flBQwOTS7t953pAkelo83JcFmMWgnn6vZg2UImqd+MoVt25qN lAHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxnMQBWwgWdwINso5rUSjIB3FqwKyYymCPGGAkI2jvqD1uwSCRR VIiUYOXSYRnx8aDpHSaFJG97CDFEjC4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFYnntQKKmgFF57gLWNDHCriOfCR2w7Uuy18Hr38cyfpNHRgWxpL0oHJ/uZOKpa1PxvtEpIrw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5291:0:b0:32d:a717:717a with SMTP id c17-20020a5d5291000000b0032da717717amr10157922wrv.40.1698137341339; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y10-20020a5d470a000000b0032d9efeccd8sm9465323wrq.51.2023.10.24.01.49.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:48:59 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.5 000/241] 6.5.9-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20231023104833.832874523@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231023104833.832874523@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:53:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.5.9 release. > There are 241 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:47:57 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 13.2.1 20230827): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 70 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5364 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5365 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5371 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip