From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f45.google.com (mail-lf1-f45.google.com [209.85.167.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C6D17461 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 08:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="GLdJmkaE" Received: by mail-lf1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-507b96095abso6279526e87.3 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:58:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698137924; x=1698742724; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=R3ukY78Kprvb6C1LoI+nPL4aI7gxBNbUgQKPAJ7OQLE=; b=GLdJmkaEE2WqQg8AHV76vD5uj32gcwEn5vjonD9DsFzSeQnv45ZTb1gPgDg5BihlBg XLGN/R2QFxhwLtTWuPUCyarbGbjkIm/nymBCuR0Ap9fVEkF9iZzMTmZTwLu83V999eUO +GpBRufh8bNoyiw4z8MSmAIUqhQkIUJh2dKLHLVrcVN0pmQ+7AIdPnjQwyxiP0vIXl0H j+tcN9RpKn70FvTzFs80nc35nPfZlcqox1rrhJuNPX02Ah3bywYivAh96tWodFx0QUA3 Zz7316Z2LrsVoWSZ3ux2Uw5J1ykzLKYOhbpb0FRjwu4viUrmuF7f5Er3AjOar3Wmc3ik tvag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698137924; x=1698742724; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=R3ukY78Kprvb6C1LoI+nPL4aI7gxBNbUgQKPAJ7OQLE=; b=Io36OwqVQAcA+lqew5ppklgxpIj2QnX+piNdkWk+uZlW5kpM0LYa7V0UO0HAemfA6y 5CSfjp/ufyQPmjosNikbOOtfRrs9/VJySKH7xdzxJ4pMj6DQtPKpAzH4s/udJltVNjZm 806stf54QTaTZtz/OVM0XYDorIkGXyzZNE0BgpINOiIjHupdciOnpoYY6RBJB2HtXjTZ JZA4IdeI8N8Bl6y9J9RmHI1gyFGz7HfCk2ndtZmFQyY78FyFfmv2E+UFEK+4KZAKH7Kr kmp/zMpeXh7efEAzMfSsggPbFEcQ4pO9Ktw/jzf7lVLN7S20aVCaYHer59erbJCJ73/F aGaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw1Zro/NPPRxI5IdwYRVjO5YaGnH8qgq3suAB/+2+ApXscuo+oV COZibXG0BS+3nF/7TMDmBOI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGYWqD3rltla/ILn0B3w4VTLRUMK+wO1IisM/F6AuKk6mqaTE2sXgcrkONCvmhwF1KdG+pzzw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:ac3:b0:4f9:5426:6622 with SMTP id n3-20020a0565120ac300b004f954266622mr10094777lfu.69.1698137923908; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t22-20020a05600c41d600b004083996dad8sm15997945wmh.18.2023.10.24.01.58.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:58:42 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/98] 4.19.297-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20231023104813.580375891@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231023104813.580375891@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:55:49PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.297 release. > There are 98 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:47:57 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230511): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5351 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip