From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>,
Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:50:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbpeQt_nyCiFRrcv@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4-v4-c93b774edcc4+42d2b-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com>
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:57:14PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This is preparation to move the STE calculation higher up in to the call
> chain and remove arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(). These new functions will be
> called directly from attach_dev.
>
> Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 115 +++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index df8fc7b87a7907..910156881423e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1516,13 +1516,68 @@ static void arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target)
> FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG, STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG_INCOMING));
> }
>
> +static void arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target,
> + struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> + struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table)
master already include cd_table in "master->cd_table", why do we need to
pass it separately?
> +{
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> +
> + memset(target, 0, sizeof(*target));
> + target->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(
> + STRTAB_STE_0_V |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, cd_table->s1fmt) |
> + (cd_table->cdtab_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, cd_table->s1cdmax));
> +
> + target->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CIR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1COR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH) |
> + ((smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
> + !master->stall_enabled) ?
> + STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD :
> + 0) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> + master->ats_enabled ? STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS : 0) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_STRW,
> + (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_E2H) ?
> + STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_EL2 :
> + STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1));
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target,
> + struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
Similary, master already has the domain in "master->domain".
> +{
> + struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg *s2_cfg = &smmu_domain->s2_cfg;
> +
> + memset(target, 0, sizeof(*target));
> + target->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(
> + STRTAB_STE_0_V |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S2_TRANS));
> +
> + target->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> + master->ats_enabled ? STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS : 0));
> +
> + target->data[2] = cpu_to_le64(
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_S2VMID, s2_cfg->vmid) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_VTCR, s2_cfg->vtcr) |
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2AA64 |
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2ENDI |
> +#endif
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2PTW |
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2R);
> +
> + target->data[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
> +}
> +
> static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
> struct arm_smmu_ste *dst)
> {
> - u64 val;
> - struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> - struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = NULL;
> - struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg *s2_cfg = NULL;
> struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = master->domain;
> struct arm_smmu_ste target = {};
>
> @@ -1537,61 +1592,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>
> switch (smmu_domain->stage) {
> case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1:
> - cd_table = &master->cd_table;
> + arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(&target, master, &master->cd_table);
> break;
> case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
> - s2_cfg = &smmu_domain->s2_cfg;
> + arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(&target, master, smmu_domain);
> break;
> case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS:
> arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(&target);
> - arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, dst, &target);
> - return;
> + break;
> }
> -
> - /* Nuke the existing STE_0 value, as we're going to rewrite it */
> - val = STRTAB_STE_0_V;
> -
> - if (cd_table) {
> - u64 strw = smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_E2H ?
> - STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_EL2 : STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1;
> -
> - target.data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CIR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1COR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_STRW, strw));
> -
> - if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
> - !master->stall_enabled)
> - target.data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
> -
> - val |= (cd_table->cdtab_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, cd_table->s1cdmax) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, cd_table->s1fmt);
> - }
> -
> - if (s2_cfg) {
> - target.data[2] = cpu_to_le64(
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_S2VMID, s2_cfg->vmid) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_VTCR, s2_cfg->vtcr) |
> -#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> - STRTAB_STE_2_S2ENDI |
> -#endif
> - STRTAB_STE_2_S2PTW | STRTAB_STE_2_S2AA64 |
> - STRTAB_STE_2_S2R);
> -
> - target.data[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
> -
> - val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S2_TRANS);
> - }
> -
> - if (master->ats_enabled)
> - target.data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> - STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS));
> -
> - target.data[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, dst, &target);
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Thanks,
Mostafa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 23:57 [PATCH v4 00/16] Update SMMUv3 to the modern iommu API (part 1/3) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make STE programming independent of the callers Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-26 4:03 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-29 19:53 ` Moritz Fischer
2024-01-30 22:42 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-30 23:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Consolidate the STE generation for abort/bypass Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 11:32 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 15:07 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 15:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:50 ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2024-01-31 15:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Build the whole STE in arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 11:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Hold arm_smmu_asid_lock during all of attach_dev Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 12:15 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 13:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-13 13:30 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Compute the STE only once for each master Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 12:18 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not change the STE twice during arm_smmu_attach_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Put writing the context descriptor in the right order Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass smmu_domain to arm_enable/disable_ats() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove arm_smmu_master->domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static IDENTITY domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 18:11 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 18:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-30 8:35 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static BLOCKED domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the identity/blocked domain during release Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass arm_smmu_domain and arm_smmu_device to finalize Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert to domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbpeQt_nyCiFRrcv@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=moritzf@google.com \
--cc=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).