patches.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
	Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>,
	Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	patches@lists.linux.dev,
	Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:50:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbpeQt_nyCiFRrcv@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4-v4-c93b774edcc4+42d2b-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com>

Hi Jason,

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:57:14PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This is preparation to move the STE calculation higher up in to the call
> chain and remove arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(). These new functions will be
> called directly from attach_dev.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 115 +++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index df8fc7b87a7907..910156881423e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1516,13 +1516,68 @@ static void arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target)
>  		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG, STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG_INCOMING));
>  }
>  
> +static void arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target,
> +				      struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> +				      struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table)
master already include cd_table in "master->cd_table", why do we need to
pass it separately?
> +{
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> +
> +	memset(target, 0, sizeof(*target));
> +	target->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(
> +		STRTAB_STE_0_V |
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, cd_table->s1fmt) |
> +		(cd_table->cdtab_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, cd_table->s1cdmax));
> +
> +	target->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CIR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1COR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH) |
> +		((smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
> +		  !master->stall_enabled) ?
> +			 STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD :
> +			 0) |
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> +			   master->ats_enabled ? STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS : 0) |
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_STRW,
> +			   (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_E2H) ?
> +				   STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_EL2 :
> +				   STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1));
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target,
> +					struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> +					struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
Similary, master already has the domain in "master->domain".
> +{
> +	struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg *s2_cfg = &smmu_domain->s2_cfg;
> +
> +	memset(target, 0, sizeof(*target));
> +	target->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(
> +		STRTAB_STE_0_V |
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S2_TRANS));
> +
> +	target->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> +			   master->ats_enabled ? STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS : 0));
> +
> +	target->data[2] = cpu_to_le64(
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_S2VMID, s2_cfg->vmid) |
> +		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_VTCR, s2_cfg->vtcr) |
> +		STRTAB_STE_2_S2AA64 |
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> +		STRTAB_STE_2_S2ENDI |
> +#endif
> +		STRTAB_STE_2_S2PTW |
> +		STRTAB_STE_2_S2R);
> +
> +	target->data[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
> +}
> +
>  static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  				      struct arm_smmu_ste *dst)
>  {
> -	u64 val;
> -	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> -	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = NULL;
> -	struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg *s2_cfg = NULL;
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = master->domain;
>  	struct arm_smmu_ste target = {};
>  
> @@ -1537,61 +1592,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  
>  	switch (smmu_domain->stage) {
>  	case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1:
> -		cd_table = &master->cd_table;
> +		arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(&target, master, &master->cd_table);
>  		break;
>  	case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
> -		s2_cfg = &smmu_domain->s2_cfg;
> +		arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(&target, master, smmu_domain);
>  		break;
>  	case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS:
>  		arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(&target);
> -		arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, dst, &target);
> -		return;
> +		break;
>  	}
> -
> -	/* Nuke the existing STE_0 value, as we're going to rewrite it */
> -	val = STRTAB_STE_0_V;
> -
> -	if (cd_table) {
> -		u64 strw = smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_E2H ?
> -			STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_EL2 : STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1;
> -
> -		target.data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> -			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> -			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CIR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> -			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1COR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> -			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH) |
> -			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_STRW, strw));
> -
> -		if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
> -		    !master->stall_enabled)
> -			target.data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
> -
> -		val |= (cd_table->cdtab_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> -			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> -			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, cd_table->s1cdmax) |
> -			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, cd_table->s1fmt);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (s2_cfg) {
> -		target.data[2] = cpu_to_le64(
> -			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_S2VMID, s2_cfg->vmid) |
> -			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_VTCR, s2_cfg->vtcr) |
> -#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> -			 STRTAB_STE_2_S2ENDI |
> -#endif
> -			 STRTAB_STE_2_S2PTW | STRTAB_STE_2_S2AA64 |
> -			 STRTAB_STE_2_S2R);
> -
> -		target.data[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
> -
> -		val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S2_TRANS);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (master->ats_enabled)
> -		target.data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> -						 STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS));
> -
> -	target.data[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
>  	arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, dst, &target);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0

Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>

Thanks,
Mostafa

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-31 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-25 23:57 [PATCH v4 00/16] Update SMMUv3 to the modern iommu API (part 1/3) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make STE programming independent of the callers Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-26  4:03   ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-29 19:53   ` Moritz Fischer
2024-01-30 22:42   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-30 23:56     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:34       ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:40         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Consolidate the STE generation for abort/bypass Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:40   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:47     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 11:32       ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 13:02         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 15:07   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 15:43     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:50   ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2024-01-31 15:05     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Build the whole STE in arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 11:34   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Hold arm_smmu_asid_lock during all of attach_dev Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 12:15   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 13:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-13 13:30       ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Compute the STE only once for each master Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 12:18   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not change the STE twice during arm_smmu_attach_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Put writing the context descriptor in the right order Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass smmu_domain to arm_enable/disable_ats() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove arm_smmu_master->domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static IDENTITY domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 18:11   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 18:37     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-30  8:35       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static BLOCKED domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the identity/blocked domain during release Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass arm_smmu_domain and arm_smmu_device to finalize Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert to domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZbpeQt_nyCiFRrcv@google.com \
    --to=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=moritzf@google.com \
    --cc=mshavit@google.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).