patches.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Shrink the strtab l1_desc array
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:01:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zl86XhrWGcBTLFAl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3-v1-1b720dce51d1+4f44-smmuv3_tidy_jgg@nvidia.com>

Hi Jason,

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 07:31:29PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The top of the 2 level stream table is (at most) 128k entries big, and two
> high order allocations are required. One of __le64 which is programmed
> into the HW (1M), and one of struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc which holds
> the CPU pointer (3M).
> 
> There is no reason to store the l2ptr_dma as nothing reads it. devm stores
> a copy of it and the DMA memory will be freed via devm mechanisms. span is
> a constant of 8+1. Remove both.
> 
This caught my eye before, I imagine(although I was not there) there was some
thought about having different spans per SMMUs maybe, but that’s not the case.

> This removes 16 bytes from each arm_smmu_l1_ctx_desc and saves up to 2M of
> memory per iommu instance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  3 ---
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index d27dd0600bf1df..735dd9ff61890e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1448,12 +1448,12 @@ bool arm_smmu_free_asid(struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc *cd)
>  
>  /* Stream table manipulation functions */
>  static void
> -arm_smmu_write_strtab_l1_desc(__le64 *dst, struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc *desc)
> +arm_smmu_write_strtab_l1_desc(__le64 *dst, dma_addr_t l2ptr_dma, u8 span)
>  {
>  	u64 val = 0;
>  
> -	val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_L1_DESC_SPAN, desc->span);
> -	val |= desc->l2ptr_dma & STRTAB_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK;
> +	val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_L1_DESC_SPAN, span);
> +	val |= l2ptr_dma & STRTAB_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK;
>  
>  	/* The HW has 64 bit atomicity with stores to the L2 STE table */
>  	WRITE_ONCE(*dst, cpu_to_le64(val));
> @@ -1655,6 +1655,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>  {
>  	size_t size;
>  	void *strtab;
> +	dma_addr_t l2ptr_dma;
>  	struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
>  	struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc *desc = &cfg->l1_desc[sid >> STRTAB_SPLIT];
>  
> @@ -1664,9 +1665,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>  	size = (1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) * sizeof(struct arm_smmu_ste);
>  	strtab = &cfg->strtab.l1_desc[sid >> STRTAB_SPLIT];
>  
> -	desc->span = STRTAB_SPLIT + 1;
> -	desc->l2ptr = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size, &desc->l2ptr_dma,
> -					  GFP_KERNEL);
> +	desc->l2ptr =
> +		dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size, &l2ptr_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!desc->l2ptr) {
>  		dev_err(smmu->dev,
>  			"failed to allocate l2 stream table for SID %u\n",
> @@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>  	}
>  
>  	arm_smmu_init_initial_stes(desc->l2ptr, 1 << STRTAB_SPLIT);
> -	arm_smmu_write_strtab_l1_desc(strtab, desc);
> +	arm_smmu_write_strtab_l1_desc(strtab, l2ptr_dma, STRTAB_SPLIT + 1);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index 4769780259affc..280a04bfb7230c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -577,10 +577,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_priq {
>  
>  /* High-level stream table and context descriptor structures */
>  struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc {
> -	u8				span;
> -
>  	struct arm_smmu_ste		*l2ptr;
> -	dma_addr_t			l2ptr_dma;
>  };
>  
>  struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc {
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-04 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-03 22:31 [PATCH 0/7] Tidy some minor things in the stream table/cd table area Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-03 22:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Split struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg.strtab Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-04  8:32   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-06-04 12:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-04 18:28       ` Nicolin Chen
2024-06-04 19:02         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-04 19:28           ` Nicolin Chen
2024-06-04 15:52   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-06-05 23:51     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-03 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not zero the strtab twice Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-04 15:56   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-06-05 21:22     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-03 22:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Shrink the strtab l1_desc array Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-04 16:01   ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2024-06-03 22:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Split struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg.cdtab Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-04 16:07   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-06-06 23:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-03 22:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not use devm for the cd table allocations Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-03 22:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Shrink the cdtab l1_desc array Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-04 16:14   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-06-03 22:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the new rb tree helpers Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-04 16:22   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-06-03 22:41 ` [PATCH 0/7] Tidy some minor things in the stream table/cd table area Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zl86XhrWGcBTLFAl@google.com \
    --to=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mshavit@google.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).