From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5014E1DF963 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.255.230.98 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728394191; cv=none; b=fmPHInIdeMqZ38FAJ+SqDRBXl9h5Hpsf0FeYKKPYbtjY2Ggz1zuF1Z1mlpueFUkJe2j4viPaJrM47im2mNxFiasira8vPdyGR1tR3m6t0sjkpEgoFOWXWlQf9QsdDidtRptVhMbk4yYZ1LC04lO7XesH+EARGg38n1sBA2hWMNk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728394191; c=relaxed/simple; bh=L8DzXMlm3jzBQIh4QzhAtXX979ucl9/0Ss8d1xS27iU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OtO19aDtx4a944hTCijIi55G79Mt7pE6qrd7342Ao5UCIHyJSsu83TIDE+282G1AcyoCVrMnQNapJ1/j7bjbCPLsGsybUqmX/hAMe9pCXuURSjsgRze/IDPOzJ07vSIRg6iDP74ow64j2ZjAesS+5z9YDwRnSXP8vEN2Tu3zQ6g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=denx.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.255.230.98 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=denx.de Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 0DC971C006B; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:29:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:29:46 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.11 000/558] 6.11.3-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20241008115702.214071228@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6tEeg0s4Zab9rwdZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241008115702.214071228@linuxfoundation.org> --6tEeg0s4Zab9rwdZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.11.3 release. > There are 558 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. CIP testing did not find any problems here: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-= 6.10.y 6.6 passes our testing, too: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-= 6.6.y Trees are 4 hours and 16 hours old. Linux 6.11.3-rc1 (5a1a1f7c8ef8) / Linux 6.6.55-rc1 (0b955ce7bd7b). You didn't quote sha1 hashes, so I have no easy way to check pipelines match the announcement. Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Best regards, Pavel --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --6tEeg0s4Zab9rwdZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCZwUzygAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8m4QAJ4hEwV0vLwN3cv+h6wX5MjLmxbIiQCfTzXS4d9dSswpLq+vE+zCqG1j5Bc= =OGMx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6tEeg0s4Zab9rwdZ--