From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EA821CC16A; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730219942; cv=none; b=XRYPE3m3zhIzK54o9zZwXVS5q9CD5Q9cwLP7ka79QeQSPRrb/0IdpMueDDMwH5WdqiT0ms04o7YsqvULxak90hHZLG5NrlF6qF90cebWs1OrjJSt6JIxihEKC4GINb3ZLmm3/9O/g7/nYJBlASgCH6Ip3wnuxfwWAkvTJUvBDNQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730219942; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FgFt+nUEU5jTtnV7+2px6chrOJx6kodCC14Li0aeAnY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ofi/WEG1hl9FLNIDjX+Q+djYmIG5ybAJVYh19utCOYbYbHltFwTROCfdm9500McaeXJkEqDCZNkqj5ig0dN88Ylcp95UkQ8ScFvjGVl2jokA8IlzSn7hUfAriEVUZEdyo63akYXk1IOa7jMOyiUxVTcMPdwaCGCJkUsaEYSnlNM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=p3Y9M/8l; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="p3Y9M/8l" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7D97C4CECD; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:39:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1730219941; bh=FgFt+nUEU5jTtnV7+2px6chrOJx6kodCC14Li0aeAnY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=p3Y9M/8lI4PqiizhCf46Mkk7w5tJJBDDoIV+7kAyFipfTcZdcNUBsep2Ex6Y+dU04 /RzCN9wo9Vt9o0R+J5ZBw9Im9D1GWop47zFy8f4MXMJxf+aODpnU5UnPlFJnVCB9i5 /1olrGUrMllFFCXWssN3XISX2gHzJI/OUlJrBET0ZS6tsbl7PSPu2nhdydq9EZs8vR 9f1y3vSP9/5ClNQ7YI2UiduTPXcwOIIENkT9tfr3TxBYi30asMkCKkprgis5ZMZL6e dp39yuIuu8GIFwd1qbntx1UAm7hxJOzS6k5IpVJTnJRaCcwyZROyFuPXO2dVNXuvhK 406tHJ5svioRQ== Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:38:59 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Antony Antony Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Sabrina Dubroca , Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 133/208] xfrm: Add Direction to the SA in or out Message-ID: References: <20241028062306.649733554@linuxfoundation.org> <20241028062309.914261564@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:18:04AM +0100, Antony Antony wrote: >On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 08:42:15 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 12:08:23PM +0100, Antony Antony wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 07:25:13 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> > > 6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> > >> > Hi Greg, >> > >> > This patch is a part of a new feature SA direction and it appears the auto >> > patch selector picked one patch out of patch set? >> > I think this patch alone should not be applied to older stable kernel. >> >> It was picked up as a dependency: > >I understand how it got selected, however, please drop >a4a87fa4e96c ("xfrm: Add Direction to the SA in or out") from backports. > >> >> > > Stable-dep-of: 3f0ab59e6537 ("xfrm: validate new SA's prefixlen using SA family when sel.family is unset") > >this is good fix to have in stable kernels > >> >> We can drop it, and the netfilter folks can provide us a backport of the >> fix above? > >It is an ipsec sub system patch. >Here is a backport. I compile tested it on 6.6. It will also apply to linx-6.1.y >To apply to older ones kernels, use -3. I've replaced what we had in the queue with your backport, thanks! -- Thanks, Sasha