From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <ddutile@redhat.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <jsnitsel@redhat.com>, <praan@google.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/12] iommufd/selftest: Implement mock_get_viommu_size and mock_viommu_init
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:19:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEyH1YPkmW1gy2da@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250613134522.GE1174925@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:45:22AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 10:13:29AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > Sanitize the inputs and report the size of struct mock_viommu on success,
> > in mock_get_viommu_size().
> >
> > The core will ensure the viommu_type is set to the core vIOMMU object, so
> > simply init the driver part in mock_viommu_init().
> >
> > The mock_viommu_alloc() will be cleaned up once the transition is done.
>
> Note the addition of the missed s2_parent store
I am adding a new patch in prep-v2 dropping the unused s2_parent:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
iommufd/selftest: Drop parent domain from mock_iommu_domain_nested
This is no use of this parent domain. Delete the dead code.
Note that the s2_parent in struct mock_viommu will be a deadcode too. Yet,
keep it because it will be soon used by HW queue objects, i.e. no point in
adding it back and forth in such a short window. Besides, keeping it could
cover the majority of vIOMMU use cases where a driver-level structure will
be larger in size than the core structure.
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In this case, we don't need to assign mock_viommu->s2_parent here
since it's a dead code. The HW queue series will assign it and add
a use case:
+/* Test iommufd_hw_queue_depend/undepend() */
+static int mock_hw_queue_init_phys(struct iommufd_hw_queue *hw_queue, u32 index,
+ phys_addr_t base_addr_pa)
...
+ /*
+ * Test to catch a kernel bug if the core converted the physical address
+ * incorrectly. Let mock_domain_iova_to_phys() WARN_ON if it fails.
+ */
+ if (base_addr_pa != iommu_iova_to_phys(&mock_viommu->s2_parent->domain,
+ hw_queue->base_addr)) {
+ rc = -EFAULT;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
> > +static int mock_viommu_init(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
> > + struct iommu_domain *parent_domain)
> > +{
> > + struct mock_iommu_device *mock_iommu = container_of(
> > + viommu->iommu_dev, struct mock_iommu_device, iommu_dev);
> > + struct mock_viommu *mock_viommu = to_mock_viommu(viommu);
> > +
> > + refcount_inc(&mock_iommu->users);
> > + mock_viommu->s2_parent = to_mock_domain(parent_domain);
> > +
> > + viommu->ops = &mock_viommu_ops;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> The patches will read better if you add the call logic for init along
> side alloc based on init or alloc ops being non-NULL in the prior
> patch and then have these driver patches replace alloc with init.
>
> Duplicating alloc into init and leaving both makes the patch harder to
> check.
I see. That will add an additional patch tentatively supporting
both ops.
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 17:13 [PATCH v1 00/12] iommufd: Repare for IOMMUFD_OBJ_HW_QUEUE Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] iommufd: Apply obvious cosmetic fixes Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] iommufd: Drop unused ictx in struct iommufd_vdevice Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12 8:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] iommufd: Use enum iommu_viommu_type for type in struct iommufd_viommu Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12 8:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] iommufd: Use enum iommu_veventq_type for type in struct iommufd_veventq Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12 8:07 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] iommu: Introduce get_viommu_size and viommu_init ops Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12 8:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-12 17:06 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-13 7:33 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-13 20:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] iommufd/selftest: Implement mock_get_viommu_size and mock_viommu_init Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12 8:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-12 17:12 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-13 7:34 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-13 20:19 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-06-13 23:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-13 23:37 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Implement arm_smmu_get_viommu_size and arm_vsmmu_init Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12 8:20 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-12 17:18 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-13 7:36 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] iommufd/viommu: Replace ops->viommu_alloc with ops->viommu_init Nicolin Chen
2025-06-10 5:55 ` Baolu Lu
2025-06-10 6:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12 8:22 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-12 17:35 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12 8:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-12 17:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] iommu: Deprecate viommu_alloc op Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12 8:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] iommufd: Move _iommufd_object_alloc out of driver.c Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12 8:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] iommufd: Introduce iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd helper Nicolin Chen
2025-06-13 13:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-13 23:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 12/12] iommufd: Apply the new " Nicolin Chen
2025-06-10 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 00/12] iommufd: Repare for IOMMUFD_OBJ_HW_QUEUE Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEyH1YPkmW1gy2da@nvidia.com \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).