From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: "robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com" <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"yong.wu@mediatek.com" <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"vdumpa@nvidia.com" <vdumpa@nvidia.com>,
"jonathanh@nvidia.com" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"patches@lists.linux.dev" <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
"Jaroszynski, Piotr" <pjaroszynski@nvidia.com>,
"Sethi, Vikram" <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
"helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"etzhao1900@gmail.com" <etzhao1900@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 07:41:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKcwMtPJuFfVA8TF@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB5276CCC219B8456DAF289AD78C32A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 08:07:01AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2025 2:45 AM
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 08:55:28AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 6:59 AM
> > > > So, iommu_get_domain_for_dev() should check the gdev flag and return
> > the
> > > > blocked domain if the flag is set. But the caller of this API could hold
> > > > the group->mutex already or not, making it difficult to add the lock.
> > > >
> > > > Introduce a new iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper to be used
> > by
> > > > those drivers in a context that is already under the protection of the
> > > > group->mutex, e.g. those attach_dev callback functions. And roll out the
> > > > new helper to all the existing IOMMU drivers.
> > >
> > > iommu_get_domain_for_dev() is also called outside of attach_dev
> > > callback functions, e.g. malidp_get_pgsize_bitmap(). and the returned
> > > info according to the attached domain might be saved in static
> > > structures, e.g.:
> > >
> > > ms->mmu_prefetch_pgsize = malidp_get_pgsize_bitmap(mp);
> > >
> > > would that cause weird issues when blocking domain is returned
> > > though one may not expect reset to happen at that point?
> >
> > We aren't changing the iommu_get_domain_for_dev(). So, it should
> > be used exclusively for functions that are outside group->mutex,
> > like this one, i.e. they should still get the group->domain v.s.
> > the blocked domain.
> >
>
> Usually the difference between func() and func_locked() is only about
> whether the caller holds a lock. If they mean to return different
> domains, may need better naming (though I don't have a good option
> now)...
Yea, naming is tricky here :)
Perhaps it could follow a different pattern:
iommu_dev_get_domain_for_driver(struct device *dev);
With a simple note highlighting to be used by IOMMU drivers in the
iommu callback functions like attach_dev.
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-21 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 22:59 [PATCH v3 0/5] Disable ATS via iommu during PCI resets Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred_attach Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15 5:09 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 8:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 8:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 19:26 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 17:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 18:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 18:29 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iommu: Pass in gdev to __iommu_device_set_domain Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15 5:18 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 8:29 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15 5:28 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 18:48 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19 2:09 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 8:55 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 18:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 8:07 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-21 14:41 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-08-31 23:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 17:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 23:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19 5:09 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-19 12:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19 17:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 13:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-21 15:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 18:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 5:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 8:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-21 13:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 9:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-22 13:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iommu: Introduce iommu_dev_reset_prepare() and iommu_dev_reset_done() Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15 5:49 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 20:10 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15 9:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 19:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] pci: Suspend iommu function prior to resetting a device Nicolin Chen
2025-08-19 14:12 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-19 21:59 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-20 3:18 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-22 6:14 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 13:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 6:35 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-22 14:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 18:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-28 12:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-28 15:08 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-28 18:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-28 19:35 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKcwMtPJuFfVA8TF@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=etzhao1900@gmail.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pjaroszynski@nvidia.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).