From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
"Drew Fustini" <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 14/31] x86/resctrl: Discover hardware telemetry events
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 13:47:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOV8bFiiQxlPDske@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aOQ44WJMXweGNlL2@agluck-desk3>
On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 02:47:15PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 02:33:00PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> > Hi Tony,
> > > static bool get_pmt_feature(enum pmt_feature_id feature, struct event_group **evgs,
> > > unsigned int num_evg)
> > > {
> > > struct pmt_feature_group *p = intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature(feature);
> > > struct event_group **peg;
> > > bool ret = false;
> > >
> > > if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))
> > > return false;
> > >
> > > for (peg = evgs; peg < &evgs[num_evg]; peg++) {
> > > if (enable_events(*peg, p)) {
> > > kref_get(&p->kref);
> >
> > This is not clear to me ... would enable_events() still mark all telemetry_regions
> > that do not match the event_group's guid as unusable? It seems to me that if more
> > than one even_group refers to the same pmt_feature_group then the first one to match
> > will "win" and make the other event_group's telemetry regions unusable.
>
> Extra context needed. Sorry.
>
> I'm changing enable_events() to only mark telemetry_regions regions as
> unusable if they have a bad package id, or the MMIO size doesn't match.
> I.e. they truly are bad.
>
> Mis-match on guid will skip then while associating with a specific
> event_gruoup, but leave them as usable.
>
> This means that intel_aet_read_event() now has to check the guid as
> well as !addr.
>
> An alternative approach would be to ask the PMT code for separate
> copies of the pmt_feature_group to attach to each event_group. I
> didn't like this, do you think it would be better?
Working through more patches in the series, I've come to the one
that adjusts the number of RMIDs. The alternative approach of
having a separate copy of the pmt_feature_group is suddently looking
more attractive.
So the code would become:
static bool get_pmt_feature(enum pmt_feature_id feature, struct event_group **evgs,
unsigned int num_evg)
{
struct pmt_feature_group *p;
struct event_group **peg;
bool ret = false;
for (peg = evgs; peg < &evgs[num_evg]; peg++) {
p = intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature(feature);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))
return false;
if (enable_events(*peg, p)) {
(*peg)->pfg = p;
ret = true;
} else {
intel_pmt_put_feature_group(p);
}
}
intel_pmt_put_feature_group(p);
return ret;
}
>
> >
> > > (*peg)->pfg = no_free_ptr(p);
> > > ret = true;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > intel_pmt_put_feature_group(p);
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Reinette
> >
>
> -Tony
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 20:02 [PATCH v11 00/31] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v11 01/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v11 02/31] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization into new helper function Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v11 03/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:29 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v11 04/31] x86/resctrl: Clean up domain_remove_cpu_ctrl() Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:02 ` [PATCH v11 05/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain create/remove using struct rdt_domain_hdr Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-03 22:55 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-06 21:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 06/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Use struct rdt_domain_hdr when reading counters Tony Luck
2025-10-03 15:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-03 22:59 ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 07/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 08/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename some L3 specific functions Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 09/31] fs/resctrl: Make event details accessible to functions when reading events Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 10/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:32 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 11/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Support binary fixed point event counters Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 12/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 13/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope monitor Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 14/31] x86/resctrl: Discover hardware telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:35 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 18:19 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-06 21:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 21:47 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-07 20:47 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2025-10-08 17:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-08 17:20 ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 15/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of events for guid 0x26696143 and 0x26557651 Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 16/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Add architectural event pointer Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:38 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 17/31] x86/resctrl: Find and enable usable telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 19:58 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-06 21:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 21:54 ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 18/31] fs/resctrl: Refactor L3 specific parts of __mon_event_count() Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 19/31] x86/resctrl: Read telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 20/31] fs/resctrl: Refactor Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) in mkdir/rmdir code flow Tony Luck
2025-10-03 23:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 23:10 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-08 17:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-08 21:15 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-08 22:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-08 22:29 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-09 2:16 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-09 17:45 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-09 20:29 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-09 21:31 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-09 21:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-09 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-10 0:16 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-10 1:14 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-10 1:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 21/31] x86/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 22/31] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 23/31] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:06 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 24/31] fs/resctrl: Move allocation/free of closid_num_dirty_rmid[] Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 25/31] fs,x86/resctrl: Compute number of RMIDs as minimum across resources Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 26/31] fs/resctrl: Move RMID initialization to first mount Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 27/31] x86/resctrl: Enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 28/31] fs/resctrl: Provide interface to create architecture specific debugfs area Tony Luck
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 29/31] x86/resctrl: Add debugfs files to show telemetry aggregator status Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 30/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Update Documentation for package events Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-25 20:03 ` [PATCH v11 31/31] fs/resctrl: Some kerneldoc updates Tony Luck
2025-10-04 0:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-06 16:54 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-06 21:34 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aOV8bFiiQxlPDske@agluck-desk3 \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).