From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83F77258CD7; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761115482; cv=none; b=VOTT/2n4PP2w7Kkqg/l8adZBSZs8Z0vR/4pqWgCBSEd+p5trO3YaXGyrD0ROtL8XUqH3KstBRCqK7OFVWM/pswXIkVfofCSCr84ac42wRiVEf9dhli7tAloq/wWYu1SqcQzG+0h8Di0v6qSN62PnXiMslrj5muQQCpRZQfmncUs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761115482; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z5AWUZgXIxpUHQV1fNHHxpTVV6Oicr9t+TxDvGlw+6k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=G4Bu901eQTK4W0Z92tB3bK/hjksBjCg8UmW01+pTCrng4RxM+d7KkIe4N9Zke8bp3WXUGdTQiHXF9szL1T+lVXu31CuBKOpms2UInMgYfkiXdLuC95pUVoNpMfVwQG910s1Tv/kDnag0rt18pzsN4859BOQcTcercYpCHecSdNY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=OiRdl3zf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="OiRdl3zf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=kyOfDxXn3l+NgMiyysxqYTdckOUTzb689OEE6eFFTKI=; b=OiRdl3zfcabVHV+WVH9hzNGVFQ 0i+ZfByOM4atbb8kHfDy6gQeI7Re38es6JsN5tmh13zxnW9jwICCGbJgvDp18LQsqgV32ieYElvCm mSBTJnTW/OXvoFYW4TatNGmCSiNh9RgVzKHW5wJuRqq/IUeM92y0x5jyeqeqIr6GTr/6dghygJRPh d4VYJqGqBgAKkkR+e7xS8F2Toh0nVymoE0a0kKaDeDrYb06k8cKRISjNVtrAj4JSHGkkdX6fFhWtl C6HlapxNk6t418RIa0UnOCJVeSaJffeaYQkk5jOWvHH2QPTwsfV/zORvRd8vM0nGGyOvOlgVNd4qI Uu3E0uGg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vBSaF-00000001hpk-2d9E; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 06:44:31 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 23:44:31 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christian Brauner Cc: Askar Safin , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Al Viro , Jan Kara , Jens Axboe , Andy Shevchenko , Aleksa Sarai , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= , Julian Stecklina , Gao Xiang , Art Nikpal , Andrew Morton , Alexander Graf , Rob Landley , Lennart Poettering , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, initramfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Thorsten Blum , Heiko Carstens , Arnd Bergmann , Dave Young , Christophe Leroy , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Borislav Petkov , Jessica Clarke , Nicolas Schichan , David Disseldorp , patches@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] initrd: remove half of classic initrd support Message-ID: References: <20251017060956.1151347-1-safinaskar@gmail.com> <20251021-bannmeile-arkaden-ae2ea9264b85@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251021-bannmeile-arkaden-ae2ea9264b85@brauner> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 03:05:35PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > Without Acks or buy-in from other maintainers this is not a change we > can just do given that a few people already piped up and expressed > reservations that this would be doable for them. > > @Christoph, you marked this as deprecated years ago. > What's your take on this? I'd love to see it go obviously. But IIRC we had various users show up, which speaks against removing it. Maybe the first step would be a separate config option just for block-based initrd?