From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bregans-1.gladserv.net (bregans-1.gladserv.net [185.128.211.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A81122E54D1; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.128.211.58 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772480811; cv=none; b=IshJLn+U1+5U9dpZDmGI1BiYmznbm8/uJoYt8C+kEmgZ47e74HrdZZDPkcHoh8ZSyC+G82mjE2Uz41UZLPt+d1tZ0rq8A/VH1VOunl0xRVDWQWgNUhAOZv3CAhDWsNQMzQo31+YOy3YFROvB589Nghlzjr/FmH5Kbsq4tdsO5ns= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772480811; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YnvBRQ4D7WmIPP7Jo0M1C2cHWB/wmhg9ump9fzSpnbg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=J7lbLrbgaGGaNOrcHlWKvKtnEdPbBUf/Jmpg2QzpdSA8SZDABNFD+Ex9hKa82hMHDEordtnKFfaL0cvOgFYQLJ3BRNTHCaahyatyZKJe7fqcwSE7LW7YLU5peXuL7vYfCw2AMRr2WXuiilhFp4+LCa2+lBMUKcp8wPtndSY+JT8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=librecast.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=librecast.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.128.211.58 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=librecast.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=librecast.net Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 19:46:39 +0000 From: Brett A C Sheffield To: Peter Schneider Cc: Sasha Levin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Harshit Mogalapalli , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@nabladev.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, sr@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/533] 6.1.165-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20260302160943.2522184-1-sashal@kernel.org> <66461c13-1bb3-473c-b57f-adba9db4f756@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On 2026-03-02 18:57, Peter Schneider wrote: > Am 02.03.2026 um 18:48 schrieb Sasha Levin: > [...] > > > I'll drop it and push the -rc2 branch again for all affected kernels. > > > > Wouldn't it better to push a -rc3 branch then, so as to not create confusion? (I'm confused now... 🤔🙄) Agreed. When we're in the middle of testing, please don't force-push over the top. It makes a mess. I just spend quite a while retesting because suddenly my branch was out of sync and I thought I'd broken something. Once you've called it, keep it. TBH it would make life a *lot* easier if RCs were properly tagged as such. Cheers, Brett