From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"Peter Newman" <peternewman@google.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Xiaochen Shen <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Implement new MBA_mbps throttling heuristic
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:26:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adaefdf7-4a9f-4055-be0b-ad30bf1683b8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240109220003.29225-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
Please note in the subject and changelog that the mount option
is mba_MBps. The subject and first sentence of changelog seems
to fuse the mount option with the software controller enabled by it,
but I do not think doing so dilutes the message.
On 1/9/2024 2:00 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> The MBA_mbps feedback loop increases throttling when a group is using
> more bandwidth than the target set by the user in the schemata file, and
> decreases throttling when below target.
>
> To avoid possibly stepping throttling up and down on every poll a
> flag "delta_comp" is set whenever throttling is changed to indicate
> that the actual change in bandwidth should be recorded on the next
> poll in "delta_bw". Throttling is only reduced if the current bandwidth
> plus delta_bw is below the user target.
>
> This algorithm works well if the workload has steady bandwidth needs.
> But it can go badly wrong if the workload moves to a different phase
> just as the throttling level changed. E.g. if the workload becomes
> essentially idle right as throttling level is increased, the value
> calculated for delta_bw will be more or less the old bandwidth level.
> If the workload then resumes, Linux may never reduce throttling because
> current bandwidth plu delta_bw is above the target set by the user.
"plu" -> "plus"
>
> Implement a simpler heuristic by assuming that in the worst case the
> currently measured bandwidth is being controlled by the current level of
> throttling. Compute how much it may increase if throttling is relaxed to
> the next higher level. If that is still below the user target, then it
> is ok to reduce the amount of throttling.
>
> Fixes: ba0f26d8529c ("x86/intel_rdt/mba_sc: Prepare for feedback loop")
> Reported-by: Xiaochen Shen <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
Thank you very much for catching and fixing this.
With the issues ("MBA_mbps" -> "mba_MBps", "plu" -> "plus") addressed:
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-18 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-24 18:16 [PATCH] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps: Fall back to total b/w if local b/w unavailable Tony Luck
2023-10-24 18:24 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-24 23:20 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-24 23:43 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-25 16:01 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 12:46 ` Peter Newman
2023-10-25 19:38 ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 20:39 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 20:42 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 20:52 ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 23:41 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 0:07 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-25 21:06 ` Peter Newman
2023-10-26 13:55 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 16:09 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-26 17:19 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 19:54 ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 23:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Tony Luck
2023-10-26 20:02 ` [PATCH v3] " Tony Luck
2023-10-26 22:40 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 22:59 ` Luck, Tony
2023-11-03 21:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-03 21:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-07 21:15 ` Tony Luck
2023-11-08 21:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 21:27 ` Luck, Tony
2023-11-15 16:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-15 21:54 ` Tony Luck
2023-11-16 19:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-28 23:14 ` [PATCH v4] x86/resctrl: Add mount option to pick total MBM event Tony Luck
2023-11-29 23:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-01 20:45 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-01 21:47 ` [PATCH v5] x86/resctrl: Add event choices for mba_MBps Tony Luck
2023-12-04 16:24 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-04 18:16 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-04 19:04 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-04 19:45 ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-04 20:03 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-04 21:08 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-04 22:15 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-04 22:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps enhancements Tony Luck
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] x86/resctrl: Add mount option "mba_MBps_event" Tony Luck
2023-12-08 18:17 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-08 21:57 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-08 22:09 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-08 22:37 ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-12 17:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-12 20:02 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-12 21:42 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 1:07 ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-08 18:29 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-08 21:50 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-12 18:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] x86/resctrl: Use total bandwidth for mba_MBps option when local isn't present Tony Luck
2023-12-08 18:26 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] x86/resctrl: Add new "mba_MBps_event" mount option to documentation Tony Luck
2023-12-08 19:22 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-12 18:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-09 22:00 ` [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Implement new MBA_mbps throttling heuristic Tony Luck
2024-01-16 19:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-17 3:36 ` Xiaochen Shen
2024-01-17 3:40 ` Xiaochen Shen
2024-01-18 0:26 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2024-01-18 21:42 ` [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: Implement new mba_MBps " Tony Luck
2024-01-22 17:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:07 ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-22 18:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-01-22 18:41 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-01-22 20:58 ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-23 12:12 ` James Morse
2024-01-23 17:07 ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-24 0:29 ` Tony Luck
2024-01-25 17:29 ` Tony Luck
2024-01-22 18:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Tony Luck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adaefdf7-4a9f-4055-be0b-ad30bf1683b8@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaochen.shen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).