patches.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Peter Newman" <peternewman@google.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Xiaochen Shen <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Implement new MBA_mbps throttling heuristic
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:26:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adaefdf7-4a9f-4055-be0b-ad30bf1683b8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240109220003.29225-1-tony.luck@intel.com>

Hi Tony,

Please note in the subject and changelog that the mount option
is mba_MBps. The subject and first sentence of changelog seems
to fuse the mount option with the software controller enabled by it,
but I do not think doing so dilutes the message.

On 1/9/2024 2:00 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> The MBA_mbps feedback loop increases throttling when a group is using
> more bandwidth than the target set by the user in the schemata file, and
> decreases throttling when below target.
> 
> To avoid possibly stepping throttling up and down on every poll a
> flag "delta_comp" is set whenever throttling is changed to indicate
> that the actual change in bandwidth should be recorded on the next
> poll in "delta_bw". Throttling is only reduced if the current bandwidth
> plus delta_bw is below the user target.
> 
> This algorithm works well if the workload has steady bandwidth needs.
> But it can go badly wrong if the workload moves to a different phase
> just as the throttling level changed. E.g. if the workload becomes
> essentially idle right as throttling level is increased, the value
> calculated for delta_bw will be more or less the old bandwidth level.
> If the workload then resumes, Linux may never reduce throttling because
> current bandwidth plu delta_bw is above the target set by the user.

"plu" -> "plus"

> 
> Implement a simpler heuristic by assuming that in the worst case the
> currently measured bandwidth is being controlled by the current level of
> throttling. Compute how much it may increase if throttling is relaxed to
> the next higher level. If that is still below the user target, then it
> is ok to reduce the amount of throttling.
> 
> Fixes: ba0f26d8529c ("x86/intel_rdt/mba_sc: Prepare for feedback loop")
> Reported-by: Xiaochen Shen <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---

Thank you very much for catching and fixing this.

With the issues ("MBA_mbps" -> "mba_MBps", "plu" -> "plus") addressed:

Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Reinette

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-18  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-24 18:16 [PATCH] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps: Fall back to total b/w if local b/w unavailable Tony Luck
2023-10-24 18:24 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-24 23:20 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-24 23:43   ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-25 16:01     ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 12:46 ` Peter Newman
2023-10-25 19:38   ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 20:39     ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 20:42       ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 20:52         ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 23:41           ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26  0:07             ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-25 21:06     ` Peter Newman
2023-10-26 13:55       ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 16:09         ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-26 17:19           ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 19:54             ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 23:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Tony Luck
2023-10-26 20:02   ` [PATCH v3] " Tony Luck
2023-10-26 22:40     ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 22:59       ` Luck, Tony
2023-11-03 21:43     ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-03 21:50       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-07 21:15       ` Tony Luck
2023-11-08 21:49         ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 21:27           ` Luck, Tony
2023-11-15 16:09             ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-15 21:54               ` Tony Luck
2023-11-16 19:48                 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-28 23:14     ` [PATCH v4] x86/resctrl: Add mount option to pick total MBM event Tony Luck
2023-11-29 23:48       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-01 20:45         ` Tony Luck
2023-12-01 21:47       ` [PATCH v5] x86/resctrl: Add event choices for mba_MBps Tony Luck
2023-12-04 16:24         ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-04 18:16           ` Tony Luck
2023-12-04 19:04             ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-04 19:45               ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-04 20:03                 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-04 21:08                   ` Tony Luck
2023-12-04 22:15                     ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-04 22:51                       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-07 19:56         ` [PATCH v6 0/3] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps enhancements Tony Luck
2023-12-07 19:56           ` [PATCH v6 1/3] x86/resctrl: Add mount option "mba_MBps_event" Tony Luck
2023-12-08 18:17             ` Peter Newman
2023-12-08 21:57               ` Tony Luck
2023-12-08 22:09                 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-08 22:37                   ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-12 17:54                   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-12 20:02                     ` Tony Luck
2023-12-12 21:42                       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13  1:07                         ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-08 18:29             ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-08 21:50               ` Tony Luck
2023-12-12 18:59             ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-07 19:56           ` [PATCH v6 2/3] x86/resctrl: Use total bandwidth for mba_MBps option when local isn't present Tony Luck
2023-12-08 18:26             ` Peter Newman
2023-12-07 19:56           ` [PATCH v6 3/3] x86/resctrl: Add new "mba_MBps_event" mount option to documentation Tony Luck
2023-12-08 19:22             ` Peter Newman
2023-12-12 18:59             ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-09 22:00         ` [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Implement new MBA_mbps throttling heuristic Tony Luck
2024-01-16 19:55           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-17  3:36             ` Xiaochen Shen
2024-01-17  3:40           ` Xiaochen Shen
2024-01-18  0:26           ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2024-01-18 21:42         ` [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: Implement new mba_MBps " Tony Luck
2024-01-22 17:34           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:07             ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-22 18:18               ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:21                 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-01-22 18:41                   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:47                     ` Borislav Petkov
2024-01-22 20:58                       ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-23 12:12                         ` James Morse
2024-01-23 17:07                           ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-24  0:29                             ` Tony Luck
2024-01-25 17:29                               ` Tony Luck
2024-01-22 18:08           ` [PATCH v3] " Tony Luck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adaefdf7-4a9f-4055-be0b-ad30bf1683b8@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaochen.shen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).